Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 02 Dec 2015 (Wednesday) 13:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Flash Exposure ND filter and max sync Speed

 
petedawgg1989
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Dec 2015
     
Dec 02, 2015 13:34 |  #1

Hi guys been into Photography for a while now and getting into Flash, getting a lend of a profoto 1200 7b pack and head. What I'm wondering is if I'm looking to under expose the ambient light by two stops can i do the following working with a 5d mark ii and a vari nd filter.

Get my ambient exposure by setting my camera to 125th of a sec and finding my aperture from there for a even exposure on the background lets just say its F16 and then getting my Flash to flash at F16 on the model. Then use a Vari Nd filter to bring down my aperture to say F2.8 and I'm thinking my flash will stay the same power as I'm opening the aperture anyway to let in more light that the nd filter takes away.

after this is done then knowing that i want to under expose by 2 stops just take my shutter up to 200th of a sec which is two stops under exposed.


i might be all wrong here or over complicating things but just thought id ask.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OceanRipple*
Senior Member
842 posts
Likes: 175
Joined Dec 2014
     
Dec 02, 2015 17:14 |  #2

petedawgg1989 wrote in post #17804803 (external link)
Hi guys been into Photography for a while now and getting into Flash, getting a lend of a profoto 1200 7b pack and head. What I'm wondering is if I'm looking to under expose the ambient light by two stops can i do the following working with a 5d mark ii and a vari nd filter.

Get my ambient exposure by setting my camera to 125th of a sec and finding my aperture from there for a even exposure on the background lets just say its F16 and then getting my Flash to flash at F16 on the model. Then use a Vari Nd filter to bring down my aperture to say F2.8 and I'm thinking my flash will stay the same power as I'm opening the aperture anyway to let in more light that the nd filter takes away.

after this is done then knowing that i want to under expose by 2 stops just take my shutter up to 200th of a sec which is two stops under exposed.


i might be all wrong here or over complicating things but just thought id ask.

Hi, If I understood correctly, I think it was fine until, " .. under expose by 2 stops just take my shutter up to 200th of a sec which is two stops under exposed .. ". 2 stops faster would be 1/500th - which you are trying to avoid. 2 stops slower than 1/200th is 1/50th - so start there.

Perhaps you have seen:
http://strobist.blogsp​ot.co.uk …-kill-depth-of-field.html (external link)
go down to the 'Walkthrough'.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,916 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2261
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
Post edited over 7 years ago by windpig.
     
Dec 02, 2015 18:38 |  #3

petedawgg1989 wrote in post #17804803 (external link)
Then use a Vari Nd filter to bring down my aperture to say F2.8 and I'm thinking my flash will stay the same power as I'm opening the aperture anyway to let in more light that the nd filter takes away.
.

This

onceth have the ambient/flash exposure set, adding a 3 stop ND filter allows you to open the aperture 3 stops for shallower DOF.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LostArk
Senior Member
418 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Apr 2012
     
Dec 02, 2015 18:51 |  #4

You want to set your aperture to whatever you want and then dial in the exposure with the ND filter till the ambient is metered how you want for your max sync speed. Think of your ND filter as a 2nd aperture in front of your lens' aperture. It's then easy to see why the only way to change the ratio of ambient light to flash beyond x-sync is to "stop down" the ND filter and increase flash power to compensate.


www.unknoahble.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
absplastic
Goldmember
Avatar
1,643 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by absplastic. (4 edits in all)
     
Dec 02, 2015 19:16 |  #5

You've really got two issues going on here, that should be handled separately.

Firstly, the only reason you'd want to use an ND filter is if you simply can't get light levels low enough to use the aperture you want to use, presumably for deliberately shallow DoF. If you want to shoot really wide open (f/2.8 or wider), it's conceivable that you won't be able to attenuate these particular strobes enough and an ND filter may be required. The ND filter impacts flash and ambient equally, of course, and does not factor into the second issue of flash/ambient balance.

Regarding the balance of ambient to flash, if you're metering the ambient light at f/16 @ 1/125, that's some bright ambient light. Is this an outdoor shoot? If your camera's x-sync speed is 1/200, going to that shutter speed only cuts your ambient by 2/3 of a stop, not 2 stops. You still have 1-1/3 stops to make up for with strobe power to get a 2-stop differential, so you would have to have your strobes metering f/25 (and sunglasses for your model :-P)


5DSR, 6D, 16-35/4L IS, 85L II, 100L macro, Sigma 150-600C
SL1, 10-18 STM, 18-55 STM, 40 STM, 50 STM
My (mostly) Fashion and Portraiture Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link) (NSFW)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited over 7 years ago by MalVeauX. (3 edits in all)
     
Dec 03, 2015 02:36 |  #6

petedawgg1989 wrote in post #17804803 (external link)
Hi guys been into Photography for a while now and getting into Flash, getting a lend of a profoto 1200 7b pack and head. What I'm wondering is if I'm looking to under expose the ambient light by two stops can i do the following working with a 5d mark ii and a vari nd filter.

Get my ambient exposure by setting my camera to 125th of a sec and finding my aperture from there for a even exposure on the background lets just say its F16 and then getting my Flash to flash at F16 on the model. Then use a Vari Nd filter to bring down my aperture to say F2.8 and I'm thinking my flash will stay the same power as I'm opening the aperture anyway to let in more light that the nd filter takes away.

after this is done then knowing that i want to under expose by 2 stops just take my shutter up to 200th of a sec which is two stops under exposed.


i might be all wrong here or over complicating things but just thought id ask.

Heya,

There's different ways to do it. You can meter with flash. You can chimp. You can be creative.

You establish ambient light with the camera settings. This is a separate exposure from your flash exposure. Meter your hand if you have to. And you can meter it down about -2 stops from normal exposure pretty easily, just with your hand in the ambient light (if there is enough). Once you get that exposure, you know what you need to do. Say you're at F2.8, ISO 100 and your meter says 1/800s in the ambient light to drop ambient exposure by -2 stops according to your meter. Just random numbers to help it make sense. But you want to shoot at sync speed of 1/200s. That's +2 stops of light, and you wanted -2 stops of light for what you metered. So you'll need to make up those 4 stops of ambient light with an ND filter to get back to your intended exposure of -2 stops of ambient for that new shutter you needed based off what you metered. Now you add flash, as a separate exposure. Meter if you have one. Chimp if you have to.

I generally don't use variable ND filters. I prefer a good quality non-variable. I find I generally get by with 3 stops or 6 stops just fine for dropping ambient. 6 stops in bright light. 3 stops in morning/evening light. If I have to raise exposure up and don't want to open shutter more, I just use ISO to raise exposure. I don't mind if my filters underexpose by a bit, since I can make up for it with ISO. This allows me to not have to worry with a variable ND filter.

Here's an example of that described process from above:

Camera settings to exposure. When I metered (with the camera, I don't use a light meter, I chimp), at F2 and ISO 100, I got 1/1600s. Fairly overcast, still a wee bright, but that's due to wide aperture of F2. To be able to stay at F2, and get back down to sync speed with my my speedlites, 1/200s, I needed to block 3 stops of light. But I also wanted to drop ambient exposure a little more than normal to let the flash isolate the subject. I had a CPL with me, and those are about 1 stop of ND actually, so I put that on there. That dropped the light by 4 stops total after stacking the 3 stop ND and the CPL. Flash was still at 1/1 power (full power) and was used to expose subject at very close distance behind an umbrella suspended over subject's head. Ultimately I opened up to 1/100s to get another stop of light back, after reviewing, because I didn't feel like taking the CPL off. But you get the idea.

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/297/18315595959_1090fb251f_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/tUud​ze  (external link) IMG_4179 (external link) by Martin Wise (external link), on Flickr

Very best,

My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,425 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4521
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt. (3 edits in all)
     
Dec 06, 2015 10:49 |  #7

I will state what some consider to be the obvious, only because oftentimes folks new to juggling ambient vs. flash will fail to grasp the principle unless it is explicitly brought to their attention (I think this is root cause to the "Is it better to use HSS, or better to use ND filter?" threads that we address from time to time:

When you put ND filter over the lens, there is NO ALTERATION to the relative contribution of ambient:flash
...you are altering the overall exposure without regard to where the light originates from.


So the ND filter allows a larger lens aperture than might be possible with the desired shutter speed, in order to reduce DOF -- but not to reduce the ambient without alterhing flash contribution.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,916 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2261
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Dec 06, 2015 11:10 |  #8

Well put Wilt.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
absplastic
Goldmember
Avatar
1,643 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Dec 06, 2015 13:02 |  #9

Wilt wrote in post #17809227 (external link)
When you put ND filter over the lens, there is NO ALTERATION to the relative contribution of ambient:flash
...you are altering the overall exposure without regard to where the light originates from.

I'd like to give photographers that benefit of the doubt and assume they understand that a piece of dark glass over the front of the lens reduces all the light going into it. Anyone who doesn't understand something this basic shouldn't be starting with flash, they should be taking some time to better understand light, filters and the exposure triangle basics.

When photographers talk about "using ND filters to increase flash-to-ambient ratio", this is really just a sloppy way of communicating that they mean to turn up the output power of the strobes and use an ND filter to stay below x-sync shutter speed or at the desired aperture. I should hope that no one thinks an ND filter passes light from the sun and strobes differently O_o, that would not be neutral.


5DSR, 6D, 16-35/4L IS, 85L II, 100L macro, Sigma 150-600C
SL1, 10-18 STM, 18-55 STM, 40 STM, 50 STM
My (mostly) Fashion and Portraiture Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link) (NSFW)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Samifoto
Member
31 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2014
     
Dec 06, 2015 21:51 |  #10

absplastic wrote in post #17809355 (external link)
I'd like to give photographers that benefit of the doubt and assume they understand that a piece of dark glass over the front of the lens reduces all the light going into it. Anyone who doesn't understand something this basic shouldn't be starting with flash, they should be taking some time to better understand light, filters and the exposure triangle basics.

When photographers talk about "using ND filters to increase flash-to-ambient ratio", this is really just a sloppy way of communicating that they mean to turn up the output power of the strobes and use an ND filter to stay below x-sync shutter speed or at the desired aperture. I should hope that no one thinks an ND filter passes light from the sun and strobes differently O_o, that would not be neutral.


+1.

The only use for an ND in this situation is to shoot with a shallower DOF and make the strobes work more efficiently as opposed to setting them in HSS mode.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Samifoto
Member
31 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2014
Post edited over 7 years ago by Samifoto.
     
Dec 06, 2015 21:52 |  #11

Wilt wrote in post #17809227 (external link)
I will state what some consider to be the obvious, only because oftentimes folks new to juggling ambient vs. flash will fail to grasp the principle unless it is explicitly brought to their attention (I think this is root cause to the "Is it better to use HSS, or better to use ND filter?" threads that we address from time to time:

When you put ND filter over the lens, there is NO ALTERATION to the relative contribution of ambient:flash
...you are altering the overall exposure without regard to where the light originates from.


So the ND filter allows a larger lens aperture than might be possible with the desired shutter speed, in order to reduce DOF -- but not to reduce the ambient without alterhing flash contribution.

What he said! It's still baffling to see so many touting that HSS can overpower the sun!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,322 views & 1 like for this thread, 8 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Flash Exposure ND filter and max sync Speed
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1380 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.