Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
Thread started 17 Dec 2015 (Thursday) 19:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sigma WR Ceramic Protector Lens Filter Resists Scratches, Repels Water

 
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 17, 2015 19:09 |  #1

http://www.popphoto.co​m …d=enews121715&s​pPodID=020 (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Martin ­ Dixon
Slit-scan project master
Avatar
1,867 posts
Gallery: 59 photos
Likes: 276
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Ealing
     
Dec 18, 2015 11:07 |  #2

Interesting, sounds amazing. I wonder what cost. I finally did away with protection filters, it will be interesting to see what people think of them. Thanks Rick.


flickr (external link) Editing OK (external link) www.slitcam.com (free slit-scan utility) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smythie
I wasn't even trying
3,785 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 713
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Sydney - Australia
Post edited over 7 years ago by smythie.
     
Dec 18, 2015 15:12 |  #3

Considering the main detraction for protective filters IMO is IQ degradation rather than reduced transmission and that the article mentions only light transmission I don't believe it's going to sway too many who are already hard against them. If the filter was advertised to reduce reflections, flare, distortion, loss of contrast, loss of sharpness, etc in comparison with other protective filters it would be a different matter.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Martin ­ Dixon
Slit-scan project master
Avatar
1,867 posts
Gallery: 59 photos
Likes: 276
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Ealing
     
Dec 19, 2015 04:28 |  #4

I thought it did say reduced glare etc. Increased transmission would mean less light in the wrong places.


flickr (external link) Editing OK (external link) www.slitcam.com (free slit-scan utility) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,452 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Sigma WR Ceramic Protector Lens Filter Resists Scratches, Repels Water
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1536 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.