Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 19 Dec 2015 (Saturday) 01:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Help -- Black Spot on Lens (not dust)

 
DanangMonkey
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 573
Joined Jul 2010
     
Dec 19, 2015 01:57 |  #1

Need some help from the lens gearheads on whether there is concern with a used lens I just purchased. Lens was graded excellent, the highest rating just below the new and was from one of the top two dealers (will withhold the name until a problem is confirmed). The lens is a Canon 85mm 1.2L, and is very expensive (even as used) as I'm sure everyone is aware. I'm still within the return period if there is a problem, but considering the price of lens I'm more that a bit paranoid about the condition.

My concerns:

1. Focus ring is a bit wobbly, but after some research this appears par for the course for this model. Will disregard and accept this as normal, AF and Manual focus appear acceptable.

2. Black spot on the inside of the front element while looking through lens while off camera. I can see "normal" dust inside the lens, just as with my other lenses and this spot is different, slightly larger than a piece of dust and not translucent around the edges like dust, its pure black and more round. Tried panning over different colored surfaces and discovered that the black spot would turn white when panned over a pure black background. Other normal imperfections in the glass such as bubbles also appear white over the black surface, but those disappear when the lens is panned away from black background. Just my suspicion but think it may be a tiny chip in the glass that is diffracting the light - it acts just like a chips in a car windshield that turns black when viewed from an angle.

Its 1:30AM, will perform some serious test shots in the morning to see if its visible in any photos. Just wanted to throw this out to those with much more expertise than me to see if there should be cause for concern.

Appreciate any and all helpful replies.


The creative artist seems to be almost the only kind of man that you could never meet on neutral ground. He sees nothing objectively because his own ego is always in the foreground of every picture. - Raymond Chandler

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DanangMonkey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 573
Joined Jul 2010
     
Dec 19, 2015 12:34 |  #2

Took several dozen blue sky shots at f/16.... Examined in LR, everything is clear except for three dark spots in the middle of the frame. They look like sensor dust, so removed the 85MM and replaced with the 70-200mm, took a dozen more at f/16 .....

Sur enough spots are in the exact same locations...

Guess I will forget about the black spot on the lens, doesn't seem to effect anything.....

I just had CMS done for the Camera body and 70-200mm lens. I just took them out of the box for the test.. Is it normal to pick up sensor dust that quickly, or should I complain to Canon?

I'm going to try the internal camera shake mechanism and take some more shots.


The creative artist seems to be almost the only kind of man that you could never meet on neutral ground. He sees nothing objectively because his own ego is always in the foreground of every picture. - Raymond Chandler

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Dec 19, 2015 13:19 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Get a rocket blower.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DanangMonkey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 573
Joined Jul 2010
     
Dec 19, 2015 14:46 |  #4

Ya, I got one.. Just wondering why I have to clean spots after it just returned from CMS.


The creative artist seems to be almost the only kind of man that you could never meet on neutral ground. He sees nothing objectively because his own ego is always in the foreground of every picture. - Raymond Chandler

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Dec 19, 2015 16:07 as a reply to  @ DanangMonkey's post |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

Canon services is getting quite the reputation. I sent my 70D in for the same thing twice. Both times I was told it was repaired. It was the same as when I sent it in, both times. Check out the 7DII focus issues thread if you want to see 'service' done wrong.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DanangMonkey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 573
Joined Jul 2010
Post edited over 7 years ago by DanangMonkey.
     
Dec 19, 2015 16:20 |  #6

Bassat wrote in post #17824988 (external link)
Canon services is getting quite the reputation. I sent my 70D in for the same thing twice. Both times I was told it was repaired. It was the same as when I sent it in, both times. Check out the 7DII focus issues thread if you want to see 'service' done wrong.


Thanks Tom .. ill check out that thread... It doesn't look like they even touched the Camera, in addition to the sensor spots I found a piece of hair in the viewfinder and none of my custom settings were erased as expected. I shelled out $100 for Gold CPS status, but this year will be the last.


The creative artist seems to be almost the only kind of man that you could never meet on neutral ground. He sees nothing objectively because his own ego is always in the foreground of every picture. - Raymond Chandler

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Dec 19, 2015 16:35 as a reply to  @ DanangMonkey's post |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

I have enough points (Canon equipment) to qualify for some level of CPS. I am not sure I understand the logic of paying Canon to provide 'free' services. After reading about Canon services lately, I just plan on taking my stuff to a local camera shop for repairs. My brother has never had these issues. He shoots Nikon. Nah, probably just a coincidence.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snegron
Senior Member
497 posts
Likes: 136
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Florida
     
Jan 02, 2016 18:36 |  #8

Bassat wrote in post #17825014 (external link)
I have enough points (Canon equipment) to qualify for some level of CPS. I am not sure I understand the logic of paying Canon to provide 'free' services. After reading about Canon services lately, I just plan on taking my stuff to a local camera shop for repairs. My brother has never had these issues. He shoots Nikon. Nah, probably just a coincidence.


Not to stray too far off topic, but the grass isn't any greener on the Nikon service repair side. I sent them a lens twice for the same problem. First time back it was not only not repaired; it came back dusty on the inside and with parts loose. The second time around they got it right. I was upset with all the time wasted.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
Post edited over 7 years ago by Bassat.
     
Jan 02, 2016 19:12 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

I just went through the gear list for CPS. I have 67 points, and qualify for Gold level CPS services, which costs $300/year. I have been shooting Canon since 2009, so let me assume 8 years (including 2016) of membership. That would have cost me $2,400. For this (to me) large pile of cash, Canon offers:

Some useless trinkets: lens caps, strap, 'gift'
Discounts on more stuff I don't need.
Maintenance service. (Sorry, my philosophy is: If it ain't broke, don't fix it.)
30% discount on repairs. (Have never needed a repair.)
Free shipping. Both ways.

To summarize: For my $300/year, I get nothing of value.
Example: My most expensive single item is the 100-400L. Assume I drop it and Canon can repair it for $1,000. The 30% discount saves me $300. Oh, boy. It would be cheaper for me to NOT be a CPS member, and buy a refurbished 100-400L II direct from Canon.

CPS membership and my part of repair: $2,400 + $700 = $3,100.
or
Refurbished 100-400L II: $1,500.

Holy crap! I could buy two of them, and still not spend the money I'd have wasted on CPS. I just do not understand the thought process behind PAYING Canon to provide FREE services. As Mr. Spock would say, "Illogical."




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DanangMonkey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 573
Joined Jul 2010
Post edited over 7 years ago by DanangMonkey.
     
Jan 02, 2016 19:17 |  #10

Bassat wrote in post #17841884 (external link)
Holy crap! I could buy two of them, and still not spend the money I'd have wasted on CPS. I just do not understand the thought process behind PAYING Canon to provide FREE services. As Mr. Spock would say, "Illogical."


Agreed ... The only reason I purchased the Gold Membership was for the CMS cleaning services. After the sensor came back dirty I called and cancelled the membership, for $100 I can clean the sensor myself (and apparently do a better job).


The creative artist seems to be almost the only kind of man that you could never meet on neutral ground. He sees nothing objectively because his own ego is always in the foreground of every picture. - Raymond Chandler

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jan 02, 2016 19:20 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

DanangMonkey wrote in post #17841887 (external link)
Agreed ... The only reason I purchased the Gold Membership was for the CMS cleaning services. After the sensor came back dirty I called and cancelled the membership, for $100 I can clean the sensor myself (and apparently do a better job).

I would be afraid to clean a sensor myself. Over 50,000 shots on 7 different bodies in 8 years, and I've never needed to clean a sensor. A local shop charges $35 for sensor cleaning.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
Avatar
3,867 posts
Gallery: 98 photos
Likes: 1136
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Post edited over 7 years ago by ejenner.
     
Jan 04, 2016 00:00 |  #12

If you never clean the sensor yourself, what do you do if you are out in the field on a 2 week vacation and your sensor gets dusty?

With the tools available now, it just doesn't make sense to me why anyone shooting landscapes (not quite sure why else you would shoot at f11+) would not clean their own sensors.

I can see sending it in for wet cleaning or something if you often work in dirt environments, but not being willing to dab it with a gel stick, I personally don't get.


Edward Jenner
5DIV, M6, GX1 II, Sig15mm FE, 16-35 F4,TS-E 17, TS-E 24, 35 f2 IS, M11-22, M18-150 ,24-105, T45 1.8VC, 70-200 f4 IS, 70-200 2.8 vII, Sig 85 1.4, 100L, 135L, 400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,504 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50960
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Jan 04, 2016 00:48 |  #13

ejenner wrote in post #17843605 (external link)
If you never clean the sensor yourself, what do you do if you are out in the field on a 2 week vacation and your sensor gets dusty?

A puff from the rocket should fix it. Has happened only once or twice to me in more than 9 years. In an unsolvable sensor crisis while away, I guess you could resort to buying a used Rebel body for $500.

(not quite sure why else you would shoot at f11+)

Macro.

I can see sending it in for wet cleaning or something if you often work in dirt environments, but not being willing to dab it with a gel stick, I personally don't get.

I have heard some bad stories about cleaning a sensor with liquids. Still, it is probably a good idea to buy one of these kits and take it along just in case.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DanangMonkey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 573
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jan 04, 2016 10:55 |  #14

Lets PLEASE end this thread..

This thread was NOT originally about Sensor cleaning, and it has drifted well beyond the intended topic.


The creative artist seems to be almost the only kind of man that you could never meet on neutral ground. He sees nothing objectively because his own ego is always in the foreground of every picture. - Raymond Chandler

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,393 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jan 04, 2016 13:03 |  #15

i'm going to start using an independent repair service once a lens is no longer under warranty. should be a little cheaper and maybe they will actually tell me what they do to the lens and possibly not charge me if they do nothing.


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,575 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Help -- Black Spot on Lens (not dust)
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1412 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.