Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 06 Mar 2006 (Monday) 13:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

f. stop changes automatically??

 
DaleRob
Member
51 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
     
Mar 06, 2006 13:29 |  #1

Using an EOS 20D in manual mode, if I set the f stop at 4, it frequently changes to 5 or 5.6 when I snap the picture. It's frustrating to not be able to use the the lowest f stop. What am I doing wrong? Or what can I do to get the opening to stay at what I've set?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Mar 06, 2006 13:35 |  #2

What lens are you using? If it is a variable aperture lens then maybe you are setting it and the wide end and it is changing when you zoom out.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ G
I feel thoroughly satisfied
Avatar
12,255 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Australia.
     
Mar 06, 2006 13:38 |  #3

This will occur if your lens is a 4-5.6 lens, such as the 17-85 IS USM. The lens is f/4 at its widest and f/5.6 when it is fully zoomed in. Partially zooming in will change the aperture gradually until it reaches f/5.6.

If you set it to 4 it'll try and keep it that low as you zoom in but it's obviously limited by how physically wide it can keep it... it'll return to 4 as you zoom back out.

Edit: Having said that, that's why people pay good money for a lens which is a constant aperture such as the 24-70 2.8... That lens won't change aperture on you no matter what zoom position it is in. Quite handy.


Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios​.com.au (external link) Reviews & Hotlinks: Domke F-3x - Pelican 1510/1514 (external link) & 1610/1614 (external link) - DIY Variable Length OC-E3 - Crumpler 6 Million Dollar Home (external link) - FA-100 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kwsanders
Goldmember
Avatar
1,259 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Hayden, AL
     
Mar 06, 2006 15:24 |  #4

Just moving the composition of a shot around, for instance, panning across a scene from something that is a little more backlit than somewhere else in the scene will change the f stop as well, especially when in Tv mode. I was seeing this over the weekend.

The situation that I was running into was a limb blowing in the breeze would sway one way and the sunlight would hit my subject a little more than when it was blowing back the opposite direction.


Kerry Sanders | flickr (external link)
60D w/BG-E9 grip, 20D w/BG-E2 grip, 400mm f/5.6L, 70-200mm f/4L, 17-40 f/4L, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 50mm f/1.4, Canon 1.4x II Extender, 580EX Flash
Manfrotto MK190XPRO3-BH with 496RC2 Ball Head
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Mar 06, 2006 15:26 as a reply to  @ kwsanders's post |  #5

kwsanders wrote:
Just moving the composition of a shot around, for instance, panning across a scene from something that is a little more backlit than somewhere else in the scene will change the f stop as well, especially when in Tv mode. I was seeing this over the weekend.

The situation that I was running into was a limb blowing in the breeze would sway one way and the sunlight would hit my subject a little more than when it was blowing back the opposite direction.

Valid point but the OP said it was in Manual.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kwsanders
Goldmember
Avatar
1,259 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Hayden, AL
     
Mar 06, 2006 15:47 |  #6

Yep... I missed that during the first read of the OP's message. There are times when I could use a delete option for my own posts.

At least, I do know from your validation of my point is that I was not in fact going crazy this weekend. I was actually seeing that. ;-)a


Kerry Sanders | flickr (external link)
60D w/BG-E9 grip, 20D w/BG-E2 grip, 400mm f/5.6L, 70-200mm f/4L, 17-40 f/4L, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 50mm f/1.4, Canon 1.4x II Extender, 580EX Flash
Manfrotto MK190XPRO3-BH with 496RC2 Ball Head
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JMAS
Goldmember
Avatar
2,492 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
     
Mar 06, 2006 15:59 |  #7

=]Specifically, I'm considering a 70-200 "L" 2.8 IS lens

That lens will hold the maximum aperture of f/2.8 or below through the entire zoom range.

My Tamron 28-75mm will also hold the f/2.8or below.

That's why it is f/2.8.

your 17-85mm will hold f/4 and below @ 17mm and f/5.6 and below @ 85mm


Cheers,
Jaime
______
Gear
Some photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gramps
Goldmember
Avatar
1,058 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Mt. WhereinthehellamI? Southen Utah
     
Mar 06, 2006 16:15 as a reply to  @ post 1258711 |  #8

DaleRob wrote:
Wow, what great & generous responses. Thanks.

I think JimG pegged it. The lens is a 17-85 IS USM as he suggested and I think I am zooming past it's capabilities. I'll try to play around with it when I get home tonight.

If this is the case, are there lenses that will "hold" the f. stop at what you set? Specifically, I'm considering a 70-200 "L" 2.8 IS lens. Would I run into similar problems?

Thanks again. What a great forum!

Take a hard look at the Canon 24-70 f2.8L if you are replacing your 17 - 85. It's a few $$$ less than the 70 - 200 and might make a better "walk around" lens.


Some pics here - http://pbase.com/sjh (external link)
20 D; 85 1.8; 24-70 L; 70-200 f4L (sold); 100-400 L; 420 Light bulb
1550 Pelican "soft case" & too much junk!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChopstickHero
Senior Member
Avatar
678 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Redlands, CA
     
Mar 06, 2006 16:29 as a reply to  @ post 1258802 |  #9

DaleRob wrote:
Thanks, I will take a look. I wasn't thinking of the 70 - 200 as a "walk around" lens as it is a bit heavy/bulky. I was thinking of buying it because I like its long focal length and low f/stop.

Having said all that, I'm not crazy about the $1,600+ price tag but I don't see many other good options.

define your "walkaround". i consider a walk around lens where the camera and the lens won't be too obvious or too large to handle and won't get in the way of what you have to do. the 70-200 f2.8 IS is really large, so I definitely don't consider that a walk around lens..... unless you like walking around with a huge lens. lol...

the 17-85 is a walkaround and the 24-70 seems a bit large for a walkaround. a 17-40 or 16-35 or even the 24-105 IS is small enough to be walkaround.


Canon 40D and 350D :: Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS :: Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS :: Canon 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 :: Canon BG-E2 & BG-E3 :: Canon 430EX Speedlite :: Crumpler 6MDH & The Whickey and Cox

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JMAS
Goldmember
Avatar
2,492 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
     
Mar 06, 2006 16:50 as a reply to  @ post 1258863 |  #10

DaleRob wrote:
I like the size/weight of my current 17 - 85. I was thinking of the 70 - 200 not as a walk around but as a secondary lens. What I've learned today, from the posts on this thread, is that I need to do a little more learning before I plunk down a lot of money for a new lens. I think, I'll even rent a lens or two to try and make sure I'm buying something I really will be happy with long term.

Thanks

That's a great decision! See what you need first then if you can, try it. Specialy with the more expensive lenses.

Even though I do not repent buying the 70-200mm (I have the f/4 version, not the f/2.$ ;) ) I thought it would serve me for some birding (city birding at least). Talk about being wrong... only later I understood that birding would only be conviniente from 400mm upwards (maybe 300mm, but...).


Cheers,
Jaime
______
Gear
Some photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Mar 06, 2006 16:59 |  #11

Isn't there a "safety shift" feature or something like that where in manual if you over or under expose a shot, the camera automatically adjusts the settings?


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MiG82
Senior Member
319 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Mar 06, 2006 18:45 as a reply to  @ Jim G's post |  #12

Jim G wrote:
Edit: Having said that, that's why people pay good money for a lens which is a constant aperture such as the 24-70 2.8... That lens won't change aperture on you no matter what zoom position it is in. Quite handy.

In these days of auto exposure, what is so useful about constant aperture? It seems to me that constant aperture just means that the wide end isn't as fast as it could be. On my 24-70, the aperture blades shut a bit when zooming to wide to stay at 2.8.


Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling in the mud with a pig. After a few hours you realise that he likes it.
20D Σ: 10-20 EX, 24-70 EX, 70-300 APO, 100-300 F4 EX, 1.4x EX Canon: 50 F1.8, G3, BG-E2 Manfrotto: 685B, 486RC2 Pentax: Spotmatic II, Super Takumar 50 F1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Mar 06, 2006 19:28 as a reply to  @ MiG82's post |  #13

MiG82 wrote:
In these days of auto exposure, what is so useful about constant aperture?

Auto exposure has been around for 30 years, but cameras still have an "M" option. Sometimes M is best.

So it's nice to have a lens that stays where you set it. That said, if you have a 4-5.6 lens, it will stay where you set it if you set it at 5.6 or higher.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MiG82
Senior Member
319 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Mar 06, 2006 20:10 as a reply to  @ post 1259592 |  #14

DaleRob wrote:
II thought that was f/4.0 but I now understand my lens really has a minimum f/5.6 but will allow me to go as low as f/4.0 only when I'm not zooming

I don't think you understand.
It's F5.6 at the long end and F4.0 at the short end. It has nothing to do with zooming, just the focal length you've picked. At intermediate focal lengths it has an intermediate aperture.


Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling in the mud with a pig. After a few hours you realise that he likes it.
20D Σ: 10-20 EX, 24-70 EX, 70-300 APO, 100-300 F4 EX, 1.4x EX Canon: 50 F1.8, G3, BG-E2 Manfrotto: 685B, 486RC2 Pentax: Spotmatic II, Super Takumar 50 F1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Mar 06, 2006 22:35 as a reply to  @ kwsanders's post |  #15

kwsanders wrote:
Yep... I missed that during the first read of the OP's message. There are times when I could use a delete option for my own posts.

At least, I do know from your validation of my point is that I was not in fact going crazy this weekend. I was actually seeing that. ;-)a

Delete option should be there for your own posts. Just edit and delete...:lol:

It's saved me many times.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,917 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
f. stop changes automatically??
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1764 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.