Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 23 Dec 2015 (Wednesday) 16:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Question about minimum Shutter Speed

 
tim1970
Senior Member
Avatar
700 posts
Gallery: 163 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 689
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 23, 2015 16:21 |  #1

When it comes to controlling camera shake I am familiar with the 1/focal length rule for shutter speed. My question has to do with preventing motion blur. When I am photographing middle school age athletics, I always try for a minimum of 1/500 (Although not always possible). But what about general snap shots around the house? In particular, when people are not necessarily moving, but you don't want to have to tell them to act like a statue. Given that I have a good IS lens to avoid camera shake, what SS can I get away with to avoid motion blur? Does 1/60 seem about right? Could I go lower?

Thanks

Tim



Gear

Flickr (external link) | Web Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dodgyexposure
Goldmember
2,874 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 234
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Dec 23, 2015 16:41 |  #2

tim1970 wrote in post #17830180 (external link)
When it comes to controlling camera shake I am familiar with the 1/focal length rule for shutter speed. My question has to do with preventing motion blur. When I am photographing middle school age athletics, I always try for a minimum of 1/500 (Although not always possible). But what about general snap shots around the house? In particular, when people are not necessarily moving, but you don't want to have to tell them to act like a statue. Given that I have a good IS lens to avoid camera shake, what SS can I get away with to avoid motion blur? Does 1/60 seem about right? Could I go lower?

Thanks

Tim

There is no hard and fast rule, but I find 1/60 too slow to ensure that there is no motion blur in people photography. I try to be at least 1/125, if the light allows.

That being said, if you need to be at 1/60 or slower because of low light, I say take the shot and embrace the motion blur . . .


Cheers, Damien

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
Avatar
7,352 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5915
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Portland, OR
     
Dec 23, 2015 16:44 |  #3

If shooting something moving you are using AI Servo right?

A lot of factors also depending on the light. What lens are you using? ISO? Aperture?


Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim1970
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
700 posts
Gallery: 163 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 689
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 23, 2015 16:58 as a reply to  @ FarmerTed1971's post |  #4

My question is completely independent of what focus mode,lens, ISO and Aperture I am using. I am not talking about getting a proper exposure, or avoiding camera shake. I am just talking in general about casual shots. My aperture will be whatever is appropriate to get my subject in focus, and obviously I want my ISO to be as low as possible, hence why I am asking what minimum shutter speed I can get away with to avoid motion blur when my subjects are not moving.



Gear

Flickr (external link) | Web Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Dec 23, 2015 17:14 |  #5

I would apply the same rules that serve me for BIF...SS north of 1/1000.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Dec 23, 2015 17:23 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

tim1970 wrote in post #17830229 (external link)
My question is completely independent of what focus mode,lens, ISO and Aperture I am using. I am not talking about getting a proper exposure, or avoiding camera shake. I am just talking in general about casual shots. My aperture will be whatever is appropriate to get my subject in focus, and obviously I want my ISO to be as low as possible, hence why I am asking what minimum shutter speed I can get away with to avoid motion blur when my subjects are not moving.

You gotta give folks more to go on. If you subjects aren't moving, you'll NEVER get motion blur. If it don't move, it can't blur due to motion.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Dec 23, 2015 17:27 |  #7

If people, animals and other objects all moved at the same speeds, we could tell you what shutter speed. However, this simply isn't the case, so every single situation will have a different answer. If you use a flash, you can go to 1/200 or 1/250th to use the flash to get a single stop action frame. If no flash, then your shutter speeds have to be varied depending on what you are shooting.

Sometimes my kids are running around, and I have to go to fast shutter speeds. If they are just sitting in a chair then I would go for 1/250th or a bit faster, because just a slight move by the kids to look at me will blur at 1/60. There simply isn't a single answer here. If I had an elderly person vs a 5 year, the minimum shutter speeds would be very different.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim1970
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
700 posts
Gallery: 163 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 689
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 23, 2015 17:38 as a reply to  @ TeamSpeed's post |  #8

I guess looking for a general guideline for people sitting on a couch, or standing and posing for a shot. Not technically motionless, since they are living and breathing, but not moving around either.

For instance, inside my house at night, I could get away with 1/60 SS without having to raise my ISO to extreme levels, which would enable to grab some quick shots without using my flash. 1/250 would not be possible.



Gear

Flickr (external link) | Web Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ONE30
I don't have a point!!!
Avatar
4,284 posts
Likes: 1560
Joined Mar 2011
Location: newYORK
     
Dec 23, 2015 17:45 |  #9

...only one way to find out, conduct your own experiment at home and see how low of a shutter speed you can get away with. really no definitive answer for your question!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,258 posts
Likes: 1527
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Dec 23, 2015 17:49 |  #10

tim1970 wrote in post #17830280 (external link)
For instance, inside my house at night, I could get away with 1/60 SS without having to raise my ISO to extreme levels, which would enable to grab some quick shots without using my flash.

What is the light source?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim1970
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
700 posts
Gallery: 163 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 689
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 23, 2015 17:50 as a reply to  @ ONE30's post |  #11

You're right. Unfortunately there is no definitive line between blur/no blur. It will be each person's opinion on how much blur is acceptable vs how important the shot is.



Gear

Flickr (external link) | Web Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Dec 23, 2015 17:50 |  #12

I guess why worry about ISO? Both the 5D3 and 7D2 do very well at higher ISOs, so set a fast shutter speed and shoot away!

ISO 6400 this evening as I tried to catch her off guard playing minecraft in a dark room with just a CFL lamp...

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/12/4/LQ_765942.jpg
Image hosted by forum (765942) © TeamSpeed [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Dec 23, 2015 17:52 |  #13

you want to get the fastest shutter speed you can get away with...1/60 isn't going to always give you a motion blur free shot...but there are certainly times where it can work...i'd shoot for 1/125 if you can...if you can't then just shoot a few shots in burst when you do, and hope you can get one clean shot


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim1970
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
700 posts
Gallery: 163 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 689
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 23, 2015 17:52 |  #14

John from PA wrote in post #17830292 (external link)
What is the light source?

Overhead ceiling lights. (formerly tungsten, now LED) I have been trying to slowly replace all of our lights with 5500K LEDs instead of the standard warm lights you normally get (Much to my wife's dismay)



Gear

Flickr (external link) | Web Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Dec 23, 2015 17:53 as a reply to  @ tim1970's post |  #15

We tried that but nobody liked the surgical room look everywhere. We went with warm LEDs in all 25-30 can lights, and I just shoot a custom WB.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,612 views & 4 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it and it is followed by 8 members.
Question about minimum Shutter Speed
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1601 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.