Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos Presentation & Building Galleries 
Thread started 29 Dec 2015 (Tuesday) 12:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Screen resolution vs Browser resolution

 
seanm
Senior Member
Avatar
778 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 161
Joined Jun 2006
Location: London, GB.
Post edited over 7 years ago by seanm.
     
Dec 29, 2015 12:19 |  #1

I'm a bit of an amateur when it comes to all this, but having recently started posting photos online again I noticed a distinct lack of sharpness in my browser (this forum) vs what I was seeing after re-sizing in lightroom.

After further inspection, it seems whenever I post images online, they are blown up or enlarged, but with the same resolution obviously. This leads to a much less sharper version appearing....I can make them the same by changing my browser magnification to 50%, but that then makes the font almost unreadably small. I'm guessing this also means all other users are seeing the blown up image, rather than what I see in lightroom (or anything that's just on my mac, and not in the browser).

Is there any way around this? I'm guessing it's something to do with different native resolutions, but i'm not very tech savvy and really am not sure how to make sense of it.

Thanks for any help!


Sean
C&C welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AceCo55
Senior Member
Avatar
267 posts
Likes: 65
Joined Mar 2014
Location: South Australia
Post edited over 7 years ago by AceCo55.
     
Dec 30, 2015 02:44 |  #2

What are the pixel dimensions of the photos you are uploading?

I have heard that many sites will botch up the sharpness of photos if they have to resize them.
So maybe look for the recommended photo sizes (pixel dimensions) for a particular site, upload a photo of that size and see if that makes a difference.

Changing the browser magnification is NOT the solution.


From the "Land Down Under" ... South Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,120 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Dec 30, 2015 14:58 |  #3

You say you are using a Mac, does it have a Retina type screen by any chance? With the retina screens they do some clever tricks with most programs to make them readable. Effectively they double up the pixels to reduce the effective resolution. They would need to do this with images in web browsers too, otherwise they would break the page layout. If you then reduce the zoom to 50% in the browser, that will mean that the pixel binning is effectively removed, and you get a true 100% view of the image.

When you are using LR though, although the textual parts of the application also undergo pixel binning to make the text readable, the actual images are not, so a 1:1 LR view will show the image at a true 1:1 on screen.

I have a friend who went out and got a 27" iMac as he thought he needed that to be able to post some (unedited) videos to youtube and update his website. He finds that the 2500 odd pixel resolution of the screen to produce text etc that is hard for him to see. To "fix" that he runs the display at a lower non native resolution. The screen looks pretty bad set up like that.It kind of put me off the idea of a iMac until I had realised what he had done, and I now reset the screen when I have to do work on it for him. He and his wife bought the thing because they fell for the Apple hype, they ended up spending nearly £1500 on a system they won't even run at optimum settings, to do a job that could have been done on a system costing £300.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
seanm
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
778 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 161
Joined Jun 2006
Location: London, GB.
     
Dec 30, 2015 15:25 |  #4

Wow, thank you Alan, I think you have absolutely pinpointed my problem and explained it very well. I do indeed have the retina display.


Sean
C&C welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,945 views & 2 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Screen resolution vs Browser resolution
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos Presentation & Building Galleries 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1047 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.