Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Bags, Backpacks & Cases 
Thread started 02 Jan 2016 (Saturday) 12:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best camera bag for carrying a tripod with gear

 
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Jan 02, 2016 12:26 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

What is the best camera bag that can not only carry a tripod, and I would say it's a medium tripod, not a compact, but the rest of my gear. I am finding carrying a tripod to be a bit cumbersome for events such as the fireworks event

i.e. two dSLRs, all the lenses in my gear list, 15" laptop and other accessories such as flash guns, card reader

Budget if required £100/$160USD (if I can find an equivalent over where I live), or less

Would prefer also if it had all weather protection




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Jan 02, 2016 12:32 |  #2

I do that with the Tamrac Expedition 8x. I also have a 7x that I use when I carry a little less gear. The bag is very well weather sealed but there is an extra rain cover available. I like the 8x because it has a padded waist strap that is nice on longer treks.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ThreeHounds
Goldmember
Avatar
1,369 posts
Gallery: 129 photos
Likes: 3724
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Tallahassee, Florida, USA
Post edited over 7 years ago by ThreeHounds.
     
Jan 02, 2016 19:42 |  #3

I have the Expedition 7x, it has a padded waist belt also. I think you would be better off with the 8x if you carry that gear and a flash or two plus the usual other stuff.


5D MkIII | 7D | Bronica ETRS
EF 24-105 f/4 L | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 17-40 f/4 L | EF 70-300 f/4 L | Sigma 35 f/1.4 Art | Zenzanon 105 f/3.5 | Tamron SP90 f/2.8 Di Macro VC USM
flickr (external link)
Blanton James Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Jan 02, 2016 19:51 |  #4

ThreeHounds wrote in post #17841906 (external link)
I have the Expedition 7x, it has a padded waist belt also. I think you would be better off with the 8x if you carry that gear and a flash or two plus the usual other stuff.

Your 7x has a padded belt? When did you buy it? I've had mine for 10+ years. Maybe they added it at some point.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ThreeHounds
Goldmember
Avatar
1,369 posts
Gallery: 129 photos
Likes: 3724
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Tallahassee, Florida, USA
     
Jan 02, 2016 20:20 as a reply to  @ Trvlr323's post |  #5

2 years ago. Couldn't trek around without it.

Now discontinued...

Tamrac Expedition 7x (external link)


5D MkIII | 7D | Bronica ETRS
EF 24-105 f/4 L | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 17-40 f/4 L | EF 70-300 f/4 L | Sigma 35 f/1.4 Art | Zenzanon 105 f/3.5 | Tamron SP90 f/2.8 Di Macro VC USM
flickr (external link)
Blanton James Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Jan 02, 2016 23:00 |  #6

ThreeHounds wrote in post #17841949 (external link)
2 years ago. Couldn't trek around without it.

Now discontinued...

Tamrac Expedition 7x (external link)

Interesting. Same belt as on my 8x but my 7x doesn't have the padding. Not sure why they discontinued the Expedition series though. Absolutely fantastic bags.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nethawked
Senior Member
802 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 244
Joined Oct 2014
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Jan 04, 2016 11:41 |  #7

Agreed, the Expedition is a great hiking camera bag. Maybe a wee bit of overkill if just lugging gear to location, but great comfort for off-trail scampering around. I just sold my last Tamrac Expedition, and not without a bit of sadness. You can still find them used from time to time.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Jan 04, 2016 16:34 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

The Expedition range is a bit of an overkill to be honest, also, it seems that retailers are out of stock of this item




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trvlr323
Goldmember
Avatar
3,318 posts
Likes: 1091
Joined Apr 2007
     
Jan 04, 2016 16:46 as a reply to  @ RichSoansPhotos's post |  #9

The expedition was recently discontinued and replaced with another model. I'm really not sure why they discontinued it though. It is really a fantastic bag. Maybe the model had just been around for too long.


Sometimes not taking a photograph can be as problematic as taking one. - Alex Webb

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nethawked
Senior Member
802 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 244
Joined Oct 2014
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Jan 06, 2016 12:02 |  #10

Tamrac went from China to Vietnam for manufacturing (better quality), and now that Tamrac and Gura Gear are now the same company I suspect that both have influenced redesigns.

The new Tamrac Anvil replaces the Expedition line.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt.
     
Jan 06, 2016 12:08 |  #11

Tripod on its own shoulder strap, where it can be on the opposite shoulder and serve as a counterbalance to the heavy bag.

Adding 5-7 lbs. of weight onto an already heavy bag is bad idea, having the 5-7 lbs. on the outside edge of the bag -- fartheest from your body -- is even worse.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nethawked
Senior Member
802 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 244
Joined Oct 2014
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Jan 06, 2016 13:36 |  #12

Wilt wrote in post #17846882 (external link)
Tripod on its own shoulder strap, where it can be on the opposite shoulder and serve as a counterbalance to the heavy bag.

Adding 5-7 lbs. of weight onto an already heavy bag is bad idea, having the 5-7 lbs. on the outside edge of the bag -- fartheest from your body -- is even worse.

Have you ever gone trekking with a tripod hanging from a strap? THAT is the worst idea ever. How is this going to counterbalance anything? Find a bag that will allow you to attach it from the center back and cinch it tight, you won't know it's there. You will have less success and even weight distribution by attaching it to the side of a pack, but it's still way better than hiking with a dangling hunk of metal by your side.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt. (5 edits in all)
     
Jan 06, 2016 13:44 |  #13

Nethawked wrote in post #17847100 (external link)
Have you ever gone trekking with a tripod hanging from a strap? THAT is the worst idea ever. How is this going to counterbalance anything? Find a bag that will allow you to attach it from the center back and cinch it tight, you won't know it's there. You will have less success and even weight distribution by attaching it to the side of a pack, but it's still way better than hiking with a dangling hunk of metal by your side.

OP said "I am finding carrying a tripod to be a bit cumbersome for events such as the fireworks event"...hardly trekking!
He even said, "it's a medium tripod, not a compact"...would he go trekking with anything but a lightweight tripod?!
I stick by the shoulder strap idea for the 1-2 mile walk from car to fireworks display, bag from left shoulder, tripod from right shoulder (or vice versa)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogloff
Cream of the Crop
7,606 posts
Likes: 416
Joined Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
     
Jan 08, 2016 18:58 |  #14
bannedPermanent ban

Nethawked wrote in post #17847100 (external link)
Have you ever gone trekking with a tripod hanging from a strap? THAT is the worst idea ever. How is this going to counterbalance anything? Find a bag that will allow you to attach it from the center back and cinch it tight, you won't know it's there. You will have less success and even weight distribution by attaching it to the side of a pack, but it's still way better than hiking with a dangling hunk of metal by your side.

Totally agree with attaching the tripod to your pack and not sling the tripod over a shoulder. Anything hanging off a shoulder will cause stress on that shoulder or even hip. The tripod will swing around bumping into things as you trek.

I use an f-stop backpack and synch the tripod to one side. Very comfortable and does not get in the way while trekking.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Jan 08, 2016 19:05 |  #15

Wilt wrote in post #17847122 (external link)
OP said "I am finding carrying a tripod to be a bit cumbersome for events such as the fireworks event"...hardly trekking!

yup.

and I agree. shoulder bag with tripod on the other side or a backpack with everything on it.

would not want tripod on a shoulder bag.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,924 views & 1 like for this thread, 9 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Best camera bag for carrying a tripod with gear
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Bags, Backpacks & Cases 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1472 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.