8thsinner wrote in post #17849231
...it doesn't matter what the image is, everyone is going to have their own take on it.....
.....What do judges ask?
I think you sort of answered and dismissed your own question. Even "technical" critiques end up encompassing some form of subjective judgement. I know a photographer that is caught up with local photo contests that he never wins. He gets so frustrated that it is actually comical. He's constantly chasing this perfectly creative image that he thinks the judges are looking for. The entire process seems totally ironic. Essentially, you are allowing somebody else to tell you how to be creative and whether or not your creativity is good, or bad. Perfect example is the very first sentence in your post. It's YOUR gallery, and you "think" it's look has improved.
Personally, I've actually started to participate less and less in presenting my work for critique (in these forums and elsewhere), unless I have a specific technical question. For awhile, I believe I was also chasing a "perfect" image and my photography definitely lost some degree of creativity and enjoyment. There's no worse feeling (I exaggerate) than capturing an image, absolutely loving it, and then having it dissected with microscopic forceps. I may still like the image but, undeniably, I will admit to being less proud of that image.
Anyways
.....I'll play along and suggest that a good place to start your own critique is by asking yourself if you could have used a different aperture, shutter, or ISO value to improve the final image.