Has anyone used this lens with the Metabones IV adapter that could tell me how the focusing is on the A7II?
id10t Senior Member 293 posts Likes: 105 Joined Mar 2012 Location: Boston area More info | Jan 08, 2016 15:35 | #1 Has anyone used this lens with the Metabones IV adapter that could tell me how the focusing is on the A7II? 6D/ 24-105 f4 IS/ 85 f1.8/ 70-300L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 08, 2016 17:31 | #2 Hi, I try it in store. I feel slowly. AF are correct. But I prefer MF is faster. A7II, 24-70f4, 70-200f4, 35f2.8, 55f1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 08, 2016 19:00 | #3 I have the AII, Metabones IV (with the latest firmware) and the 70-200 non IS. I have yet to try that combo. I will test it out tomorrow. https://500px.com/chriskennedydotphoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 09, 2016 19:03 | #4 Heres my non scientific review: AF is quick but not as fast as my 6D. There is a definite quarter to half a second lag when acquiring focus (you can hear the motor trying a little harder). I found the set up had issues when focusing with something that had very little contrast. I was attempting to focus on a black trash can that was roughly 30 feet away, it kept hunting and hunting until I gave up. I was shooting just around sunset on a cloudy day so the available light was limited. https://500px.com/chriskennedydotphoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 10, 2016 07:50 | #5 NeverFollow wrote in post #17851621 Heres my non scientific review: AF is quick but not as fast as my 6D. There is a definite quarter to half a second lag when acquiring focus (you can hear the motor trying a little harder). I found the set up had issues when focusing with something that had very little contrast. I was attempting to focus on a black trash can that was roughly 30 feet away, it kept hunting and hunting until I gave up. I was shooting just around sunset on a cloudy day so the available light was limited. In the end I was somewhat pleased with the performance, there were times where it grabbed focus right away. However, if I had a wedding tomorrow, I would be using the 6D. I felt like there were to many instances where the lens was hunting for focus. On a plus note, colors, sharpness, and contrast are top notch as one would expect with the 70-200 L. Thank you for the report. 6D/ 24-105 f4 IS/ 85 f1.8/ 70-300L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Trad59 Member 40 posts Likes: 7 Joined Apr 2014 Location: Australia More info | I had the IS version when I had my 6D and it was a very nice combo, but in the end I sold the zoom in favour of something a bit more discreet (size and colour) and bought the 200 L ii. I switched over to Sony A7ii and the 200 L ii is still with me, it's a very under rated lens, sharp straight up from f2.8, with lovely bokeh, it's black and similar in size and weight as my 100L. Every now and then I think it would be nice to get the zoom again, there's a non IS version about to go on eBay and I was tempted, so it was timely to read your mini review, thanks you just saved me a bit of cash...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1939 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||