Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 09 Jan 2016 (Saturday) 19:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

wide angle lenses.

 
savie
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Jan 2016
     
Jan 09, 2016 19:26 |  #1

What type of wide angle lenses are compatible with a dslr canon rebel t3i. I am not looking for anything too fancy just something in the couple hundred dollar range




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,401 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 517
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan / South Carolina
     
Jan 09, 2016 21:19 |  #2

The Canon EFS 10-18 STM is probably the best budget wide angle lens out there for a crop body.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ceriltheblade
Goldmember
2,484 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2007
Location: middle east
     
Jan 10, 2016 08:10 |  #3

I can't think of a wide angle lens which isn't compatible as long as it is EF or EF-s
I agree with the above about the budget lens.

When my primary body was a crop I used the 10-22 EFS and I really liked it (I still have it but use it less frequently).
So you can't go wrong with that one either.
I am just unsure about the pricing.

Welcome to the forum


7D/5dIII
50 1.8 II, MP-E65, 85 II, 100 IS
8-15 FE, 10-22, 16-35 IS, 24-105, 70-200 f4IS, 100-400 ii, tamron 28-75 2.8
600 ex-rt, 055xproB/488rc2/Sirui k40x, kenko extens tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Vertigo1
Senior Member
310 posts
Likes: 49
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jan 10, 2016 08:13 |  #4

I also used to have an EF-S 10-22 before I went full frame - amazing lens. I hear the 10-18 is very good for the money and runs the 10-22 close in terms of image quality.


Canon 5D3/6D | EF 16-35 f/4L IS | EF 24-70 f/2.8L II | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II | EF 35 f/1.4L II | EF 50 f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jan 10, 2016 08:35 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

Vertigo1 wrote in post #17852302 (external link)
I also used to have an EF-S 10-22 before I went full frame - amazing lens. I hear the 10-18 is very good for the money and runs the 10-22 close in terms of image quality.

I agree. Sold the 10-22 when I moved to full frame. I added the 10-18 STM for video on my 70D. It is the optical equal of the 10-22, at least. But it is 2/3 stop slower. I also just acquired a Tokina 11-20 f/2.8. Fast and really good, optically.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LV ­ Moose
Moose gets blamed for everything.
Avatar
23,434 posts
Gallery: 223 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4798
Joined Dec 2008
     
Jan 10, 2016 09:20 |  #6

Vertigo1 wrote in post #17852302 (external link)
I also used to have an EF-S 10-22 before I went full frame - amazing lens. I hear the 10-18 is very good for the money and runs the 10-22 close in terms of image quality.

+1


Moose

Gear... Flickr (external link)...Flickr 2 (external link)...
Macro (external link)...Hummingbirds (external link)
Aircraft (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Jan 10, 2016 09:56 |  #7

Any lens with the EF or EF-S designation will work with your rebel; just need to figure out what it is you actually need from "wide angle".


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Jan 10, 2016 10:19 |  #8

how wide are you wanting?


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,119 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Jan 10, 2016 10:50 |  #9

If you are using the standard 18-55mm kit zoom that would have come with your camera, there are several different versions, or one of the other 18-××× kit zooms for that matter the 18mm wide end used, at one time, to be considered a quite wide angle lens in terms of angle of view. Back then it would have been comparable to using a 28mm lens when all we had was 35mm film.

These days thanks to improved computer aided design and manufacturing techniques, it is possible to produce lenses with much wider angles of view. When using a camera like the Canon T3i, with it's smaller APS-C sized sensor the 18mm to 15mm would be considered wide angle and anything less would be considered to be a super or ultra wide angle lens. Remember that with such short focal lengths even 1 or 2mm changes in focal length can have a very significant impact on the angle of view. The Ef-s 10-18mm STM lens is considered an ultra wide angle lens at the wide 10mm setting, and it zooms in to become a simple wide angle lens at 18mm. This is actually a very reasonably priced lens, there isn't anything else that will produce good results for less money.

You do have to be careful when looking at lenses though. A lot of the literature and ven manufacturers websites categorise Ultra/super wide angle lenses based on using lenses on the 35mm format. So lenses that would be considered "normal"* on an APS-C body are listed as wideangle, lenses in the 24 to 35mm range in this case. Lenses listed as super or ultra wide would only be considered wide angle on APS-C, such as 14 to 20mm lenses. Because they have to cover a larger sensor size they are generally more expensive and physically larger and heavier. The Canon 11-24mm L lens is the widest ultra wideangle lens made for the 35mm format, and costs around £3000, while the 10-18mm STM for APS_C is only around £200. To get the same field of view as the 11mm on 35mm format you would need to use a 7mm lens on APS-C.

So in conclusion I would also recommend the Canon 10-18mm STM lens for your camera. It's on my to buy list, as although I mainly use very long telephoto lenses, up to 600mm, it is so cheap that it is worth keeping in the bag for the times when it might be useful.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,401 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 517
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan / South Carolina
     
Jan 10, 2016 11:39 |  #10

Vertigo1 wrote in post #17852302 (external link)
I also used to have an EF-S 10-22 before I went full frame - amazing lens. I hear the 10-18 is very good for the money and runs the 10-22 close in terms of image quality.

Another former owner of the EFS 10-22mm here, The 10-18mm did not exist when I needed a wide angle lens for a crop. I was quite pleased with the 10-22, and only sold it because I added a full frame body that was then used for all my wide angle shots.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RodneyCyr
Senior Member
683 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 146
Joined Feb 2005
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jan 10, 2016 12:42 |  #11

Here is a way-out-in-left-field suggestion - the 8mm Rokinon fisheye. Since getting mine, I find I use my 10-22EFs infrequently. I get fairly good results by "de-fishing" the images in post-processing. I usually process them both normal (fisheye) and "de-fished". Then I choose which one I like best. Sometimes I keep both. I estimate that the angle of coverage for a de-fished image is about 6 to 7 mm on a crop camera.

The lens covers the entire frame of a crop camera such as the Rebel or xxD cameras. On a full-frame camera it is supposed to project a circular image in the middle of the frame.

This is a link to some samples I posted a few years ago. https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=16934845


Canon 80D, 60D, Canon 10-22EFs, 15-85EFS IS, Sigma 100-400, Sigma 135/1.8ART, Sigma 30mm f/1.4DC, Canon 60mm EFs Macro, Rokinon 8mm fisheye, 550EX flash, Olympus TG6 underwater P&S
Postprocessing: DxOLabs 5, DxO Viewpoint 3, Paint Shop Pro 2021
Speak softly and carry a big zoom.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hikermk
Member
72 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2012
Location: Black Hills SD
     
Jan 10, 2016 16:55 |  #12

A few weeks ago I was in the same boat as you. Looking for my very first wide angle and didn't know what to get. I had it rounded down to my top 3 choices of a 10-18, 10-22 or the Tokina 11-16. My friend uses the Tokina 11-16 on his Nikon and takes amazing photos. I was leaning towards this choice because of the F 2.8, but I went with the 10-22. Reason being is because of the positive reviews. I got it off eBay and it was practically new with a filter and hood. Got it for a great price and came in the mail yesterday. Can't wait to use it.


Canon 80D, Canon T4i, Sigma 70-200 F2.8, Canon 85 F1.8, Canon EFS 18-135 STM, Canon EFS 18-135, EFS 10-22, Speedlight 420 EX, Speedlight 430 EX II, Stroboframe, Manfrotto tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
savie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Jan 2016
     
Jan 12, 2016 19:39 as a reply to  @ DreDaze's post |  #13

Enough to fit in a wedding party and use for landscapes




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50982
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Jan 12, 2016 19:47 |  #14

savie wrote in post #17855963 (external link)
Enough to fit in a wedding party and use for landscapes

I suppose you have the 18-55mm lens... is 18mm not wide enough? Then go for the 10-18mm as already mentioned.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jan 14, 2016 12:02 |  #15

savie wrote in post #17855963 (external link)
Enough to fit in a wedding party and use for landscapes

ultra wide angle for people is generally a bad idea, even large groups.

18mm on apsc would be wide enough for groups, too wide even, however, landscapes are subjective. a normal range lens may be wide enough for some. What lens are you working with now?


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,002 views & 1 like for this thread, 15 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
wide angle lenses.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1009 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.