Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 09 Jan 2016 (Saturday) 19:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

CTR

 
K-Mount
Member
75 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2009
Post edited over 7 years ago by K-Mount.
     
Jan 09, 2016 19:47 |  #1

Which do you prefer? 1st or 2nd? and why?

1st

IMAGE: https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1683/24199625321_be22ea9c1e_b.jpg

2nd

IMAGE: https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1531/23626688474_73a5662e01_b.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,916 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2261
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Jan 09, 2016 20:02 |  #2

I like the first. The second looks static.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,913 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14872
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 09, 2016 20:45 |  #3

The second one is a bit boring, but the fake blur is just awful on the first.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DThriller
Goldmember
Avatar
2,057 posts
Gallery: 89 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 3033
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Rhode Island
     
Jan 09, 2016 23:46 |  #4

Sorry but I agree ^^^^

Just do it for real! Build a cheap rig for a rolling shot or do a pan as the car drives by or shoot from another car while both are moving.


http://www.facebook.co​m/DPhillipsStudios (external link)
http://DPhillipsStudio​s.com (external link)
@DPhillipsStudios
YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.co​m …/UCgAZ5-OKdg1YXONAjGu91zQ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dodgyexposure
Goldmember
2,874 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 234
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jan 10, 2016 19:18 |  #5

^^ me too. As a concept, the first is much better. Getting the motion blur in camera will make it more even, and therefore look more realistic.


Cheers, Damien

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bonecollector
Member
Avatar
228 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Feb 2015
Location: Massatchusetts
     
Jan 12, 2016 08:18 |  #6

Good shot...

I think a real blur would definitely look allot better.

Also the brake lights look like you edited them separately... they look a little too processed. They don't look natural.
If they are natural than I guess it's just me, they just grabbed my attention as looking fake.

Other than that I like the shot.
Seth


https://www.instagram.​com/sethtrudeauphotogr​aphy/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chakrade
Member
33 posts
Joined Jan 2013
     
Jan 27, 2016 13:09 |  #7

I agree with the other members, the first picture looks better - although it would look better if the blur was not fake...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nortonski
Senior Member
603 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Oct 2013
Location: Good ole Blighty
     
Jan 27, 2016 13:12 |  #8

As others have said, that blur in #1 looks fake, it not only detracts from the image but also makes it worse in my opinion & the standard #2 is rather bland...


_______________
Canon EOS 5D4
EF 17-40L | EF 24L II | EF 50L | EF 85L II | EF 24-70L 2.8 II | EF 70-200L 2.8 IS | EF 50M | EF 28-135 | 600EX-RT | ST-E3-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tifosi
Member
49 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 82
Joined Dec 2015
     
Jan 28, 2016 13:44 |  #9

I agree that #1 is more visually interesting, but do not like the fake blur.

Love the subject, however!


Canon 5Diii l Canon 35/1.4Lii l Canon 70-200/2.8Lii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,775 views & 1 like for this thread, 9 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
CTR
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
474 guests, 156 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.