So I was part of this local photography group's Facebook page and these issues constantly kept being brought up: "only an amateur thinks equipment is important" referring to someone with a expensive camera who was doing it wrong. Then another chimed in complaining about a person with "expensive ($4-5k)" gear who apparently was doing it wrong. And it went on with snide remarks toward these people they don't even know. Only one of them was a 'professional'.
And I get it, a camera is just a tool and you don't need anything specific or expensive to take great photos.
But it still makes me angry.
Certainly there are people on Earth who can afford anything they want to buy. Why start with a Polaroid when you can easily afford a 5D3? And none of the people making those remarks know if the person is a beginner or not.
In terms of the WHOLE of photography, certainly equipment can make it easier. Sometimes specific equipment is necessary i.e. a 1DX for its rugged all weather capability. You wouldn't buy a Rebel if you wanted the robust AF system of a 7D mark 2. If you have the money it makes sense to buy the tool that works for your needs.
I feel that those in that group have older equipment and a bit too much envy of people who can afford current gear.
I didn't engage them in their degrading of fellow photographers - I mean discussion. I left the group.
What do you all think? When I see someone whether at a event, in the field or on TV, the last thing on my mind is what are they using, how much does it cost and are they doing it right.
. I especially love seeing sink faucets with super thin depth of field and high ISO grain and brick walls... 



