gmm213 wrote in post #17869116
My question is because generally most photogs that weve worked with in a TFP situation go out of there way( not in the contract, just off hand) that they dont shop the images around. Ones contract actually states that either party can sell the images with no contact to the other except in an exclusive rights situation.
A lot of models shes talked to say they usually have clauses stating that in a TFP situation both parties can use them for promotion but for monetary gain the contract should be re evaluated.
I get in most cases the gain wont be enough to warrant it, but theres always that possibility.
Well, that's up to the photographer. Me, I wouldn't like to be asking for permission every time I licence the image or use it. My model release form states clearly that. I'm not interested in being Mr Nice Bloke to the effect that it cripples my business model. That's one reason I prefer to pay the models $50 for their time, have them sign the release, even transfer the copyright of any images they might have accidentally or incidentally or purposefully made with any equipment that belongs to me, and off we go. I play nice in the sense that even when I pay them I let them have a copy of the final images for their own use, but they cannot re-sell them, nor can they ask for any more images than I give them, nor can they demand to see all the images from the shoot so that they can decide which ones they want (heck, I'm not retouching photos I ain't gonna use). I've never been one to like TFP agreements, as I'm afraid the model might find them specious, or I actually find them specious.
In a nutshell: it's up to the photographer to bend double in an attempt to be nice and/or motivate the model to pose, but it is in no way the norm, and thus, you shouldn't expect it of any photographer much less demand it or be upset if he says 'no, the photo is mine, I compensated you, you have no rights'.