Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 07 Mar 2006 (Tuesday) 06:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wedding Panoramas

 
BobL
Member
159 posts
Joined Apr 2005
     
Mar 07, 2006 06:40 |  #1

I'm more of a landscape photographer so I couldn't resist taking these panos at a couple of recent weddings. I have the full manfrotto pano tripod but I just shot these hand held I left the boring old portraits to the pro ;-)a

The church shot is a 180 degree: 6 x 8 Mp shots taken at 1600 ISO taken with my D20.
The over water shot is a 360 degree pano: 12 x 8 Mp shots at 800 ISO also with my D20. I still have to process out the exposure banding - no biggie if I go back to the RAW shots

When I print them out I use 210 mm wide roll paper so they come out pretty long.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PIXI_666
Goldmember
Avatar
2,005 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
     
Mar 07, 2006 06:42 |  #2

i like the last one that is beautiful, but i think id cut it off where the jetty stops on the right?

Del


"Capturing, Creating & Preserving your memories"
Adelle Cousins Photography

www.adellecousins.com.​au (external link)
nfo@adellecousins.com.​au (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clengster_77
Senior Member
Avatar
613 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Philippines
     
Mar 07, 2006 06:45 |  #3

nice :)


Canon 5D x 2
16 - 35L mk1 + 85 1.2L FD + 70 - 200 2.8L
50 1.4 + 85 1.8 + 580 EX + 420 EX + 055ProB + 488Rc2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BobL
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
159 posts
Joined Apr 2005
     
Mar 07, 2006 06:46 |  #4

Here are a couple more.

The river shore view was shot with a 5 Mp IXUS, 8 shots
The reception shot is a 90 degree 5 x 8 Mp Images with a D20 on 3200 ISO (ie no flash)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BobL
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
159 posts
Joined Apr 2005
     
Mar 07, 2006 06:48 as a reply to  @ PIXI_666's post |  #5

PIXI_666 wrote:
i like the last one that is beautiful, but i think id cut it off where the jetty stops on the right?

Del

At the end of the jetty is where their reception (South Perth Boathouse) was held so I will probably just cut out the sign on the right




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PIXI_666
Goldmember
Avatar
2,005 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
     
Mar 07, 2006 06:56 |  #6

That's not at Sandalford Estate is it???? My sister was married there and those barrels look like the reception room we were in, it was BEE EE YOOOO TIFUL! Unfortunately i was only 18 and not into wedding photography much so didn't get any gorgeous photo's in there!!! I liek the barrel pano that one is noice!


"Capturing, Creating & Preserving your memories"
Adelle Cousins Photography

www.adellecousins.com.​au (external link)
nfo@adellecousins.com.​au (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
staciecd
Goldmember
Avatar
1,383 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
     
Mar 07, 2006 07:02 |  #7

I really like the reception shot. What a great place for a reception!


---------------
Digital Rebel XT 350 | Kit Lens, 50mm f/1.8 II, 17-40mm L, 70-200mm f4 L, 70-200mm f2.8 IS, 15mm Fisheye
Speedlight 580EX II, 2 PocketWizard Plus II
Stacie's Portfolio (external link) Updated Feb 2008 | Stacie on Flickr (external link)

---------------

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dentharg
Member
Avatar
86 posts
Joined Sep 2005
     
Mar 07, 2006 07:22 |  #8

How do you do it??


EOS 350D
Canon 17-40/4 | Canon 50/1.8 | Canon 85/1.8
580ex II | Velbon Sherpa 600R | WhiBal

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BobL
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
159 posts
Joined Apr 2005
     
Mar 07, 2006 07:29 as a reply to  @ PIXI_666's post |  #9

PIXI_666 wrote:
That's not at Sandalford Estate is it???? My sister was married there and those barrels look like the reception room we were in, it was BEE EE YOOOO TIFUL! Unfortunately i was only 18 and not into wedding photography much so didn't get any gorgeous photo's in there!!! I liek the barrel pano that one is noice!

Yep that's the place - it's called the "Oak Room" - the aroma of oak and fortified wine was magic! The Sandalford Website has a Quicktime VR of that room if you want to see it in detail. All my panos are also made into high resolution QTVRs but don't usually make these public. The original Oak room pano shot is 29 Mp.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PIXI_666
Goldmember
Avatar
2,005 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
     
Mar 07, 2006 07:38 |  #10

yes thats where we were i loved it its so my scene and the wine barels made for perfect photos i hope one day i get a weddin ghtere, id love to do a swan valley wedding with all the vines and wines lol gorgoeus darling!!


"Capturing, Creating & Preserving your memories"
Adelle Cousins Photography

www.adellecousins.com.​au (external link)
nfo@adellecousins.com.​au (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BobL
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
159 posts
Joined Apr 2005
     
Mar 07, 2006 07:47 as a reply to  @ dentharg's post |  #11

dentharg wrote:
How do you do it??

There are many panorama stitching programs around that can do this and whole websites on how to make panoramas. It is relatively easy to do for distant landscapes but there are many tricks involved in getting it right inside and especially when people are involved. The individual shots are taken with a 20 to 25% overlap on each side.The biggest problem comes when people on the edges of the individual frames move. If you use portrait framing (which all these panos are) then you only have a relatively narrow middle half/third of the shot that is not part of an adjacent shot. Thus you need to divide your shots up into segments that avoids people at the edges. This was impossible to do in the church pano was and I had to go back and cut and paste a couple of peoples heads from one of the original images into the final pano because they moved so much in between the shots. There is also a parallax problem to avoid but that's probably too technical to discuss in these threads.

All my panos are stitched together using Apple QuickTime VR Authoring tool (I don't think this program is available any more - it ony runs on Mac OS9 and I keep a 3 year old Mac Laptop running on OS9 just to do this) because I also make them into QTVRs. When you use a large MP cameras you can zoom in a long way and check out a lot of detail in QTVRs.

All this is fun but takes planning, processing time and effort. The original image sizes are enormous, for example the over water shot is 50 Mp or 150 Mb of raw image and chews up hard drive space real quick. It takes me about one hour to process the individual images for exposure and then stitch the shots together. Printing takes another hour because I usually do a 50 or 100mm wide test print before I do a final print.

When it works you can get a great effect but it's not something that would probably pay and only do it for friends.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PIXI_666
Goldmember
Avatar
2,005 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
     
Mar 07, 2006 08:18 as a reply to  @ BobL's post |  #12

BobL wrote:
There are many panorama stitching programs around that can do this and whole websites on how to make panoramas. It is relatively easy to do for distant landscapes but there are many tricks involved in getting it right inside and especially when people are involved. The individual shots are taken with a 20 to 25% overlap on each side.The biggest problem comes when people on the edges of the individual frames move. If you use portrait framing (which all these panos are) then you only have a relatively narrow middle half/third of the shot that is not part of an adjacent shot. Thus you need to divide your shots up into segments that avoids people at the edges. This was impossible to do in the church pano was and I had to go back and cut and paste a couple of peoples heads from one of the original images into the final pano because they moved so much in between the shots. There is also a parallax problem to avoid but that's probably too technical to discuss in these threads.

All my panos are stitched together using Apple QuickTime VR Authoring tool (I don't think this program is available any more - it ony runs on Mac OS9 and I keep a 3 year old Mac Laptop running on OS9 just to do this) because I also make them into QTVRs. When you use a large MP cameras you can zoom in a long way and check out a lot of detail in QTVRs.

All this is fun but takes planning, processing time and effort. The original image sizes are enormous, for example the over water shot is 50 Mp or 150 Mb of raw image and chews up hard drive space real quick. It takes me about one hour to process the individual images for exposure and then stitch the shots together. Printing takes another hour because I usually do a 50 or 100mm wide test print before I do a final print.

When it works you can get a great effect but it's not something that would probably pay and only do it for friends.

i thought id mention doing pano's works better with a swivel tripod then you can click, move, click, move, click etc without it going off balance so you can stitch it a lot nicer...and then if its not 100% perfect put it in PS and heal the stitched parts you can still see...

Del


"Capturing, Creating & Preserving your memories"
Adelle Cousins Photography

www.adellecousins.com.​au (external link)
nfo@adellecousins.com.​au (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jamiewexler
Goldmember
Avatar
2,032 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Grafton, MA
     
Mar 07, 2006 08:31 |  #13

The reception Pano is very nice!


Massachusetts Wedding Photographer (external link)
My blog (external link)
my facebook (external link)
my gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberPet
Hiding Under a Rock
Avatar
4,052 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: Piteå, Sweden
     
Mar 07, 2006 09:23 |  #14

I have to remember that, to actually make a panorama... would look awesome in print!


/Petra Hall
Click here to view my geeky gear list
I shoot as much as possible in available light... sometimes, my flash is available – Joe Buissink

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Mar 07, 2006 15:21 |  #15

That's a great idea!

One suggestion though - meter the whole scene, work out what the brightest area is, then shoot all the frames in manual. That way you won't get banding. If you need to use your flash i'd be tempted to stick that in manual too, for consistence, but it'd be best avoided.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,642 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Wedding Panoramas
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1801 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.