Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 24 Jan 2016 (Sunday) 00:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Couple of 1D & 1DII questions.

 
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jan 24, 2016 00:16 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

I just acquired a 1D and a 1DII from another member. I've never used either before. I have some questions about these cameras right off the bat.

1.) Do I need to bother with the Firewire connection and Personal Functions?
2.) About how big can I print 8MP and 4MP images?
3.) Will DPP (I have 3 & 4), or LR 5.7 open the raw files from these bodies?

Thanks in advance.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,864 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Likes: 6030
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Jan 24, 2016 01:22 |  #2

the only thing I think you'll need Firewire for is to change the owner information (if it exists and you want to change it)


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jan 24, 2016 01:28 as a reply to  @ joeseph's post |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Thanks. Some of the personal functions may be of use, depending on how I use the cameras. Mostly, they are just a couple of toys. Have you ever used a USB to FIREWIRE adapter?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,520 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6399
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Jan 24, 2016 01:57 |  #4

My DPP V 4.1.50.0 does not read 1DS2 RAW files. I also have 3.7.3.0 which does.


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Jan 24, 2016 10:13 |  #5

Bassat wrote in post #17870342 (external link)
I just acquired a 1D and a 1DII from another member...Will DPP (I have 3 & 4), or LR 5.7 open the raw files from these bodies?

You may have finally found a use for DNGs.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jan 29, 2016 06:59 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Not sure if anyone is interested or not, but LR 5.7 opens raw files from both the 1D and 1DII.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited over 7 years ago by MalVeauX. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 29, 2016 07:11 |  #7

Heya,

I have printed from the 8MP body, as large as 16x20. Looks great.
And the 4MP has some 8x10's from it that are great.

Their files open in everything basically, except Canon's latest DPP4 which excludes most cameras anyways. The 1D straight up drops TIFs anyways, which is cool, as it's RAW format.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jan 29, 2016 10:39 as a reply to  @ MalVeauX's post |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

Malveaux,

Thanks, that is about what I figured from the pixel dimensions of each. Getting the controls down on the 1DII. Wow, they are different than my 6D/70D. I want to shoot my grandson's spring athletic stuff with the 1DII, and compare to what I get from the 70D. Oh, the 1D (not II) manual says raws are .CRW, and I am getting the .TIF files. Thanks for putting that out, too. Having some difficulties with 580EX II, but my 430EX two works fine, so it is probably some on-flash function I have set.

One thing I am having real troubles with is: Does my wife really not notice the difference between a 6D and 1DII? Or is she silently noticing gear I buy, and planning a FREAKING HUGE SHOE BUYING BINGE! She never seems to notice when I buy new anything.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Jan 29, 2016 11:19 |  #9

Bassat wrote in post #17877656 (external link)
Malveaux,

Thanks, that is about what I figured from the pixel dimensions of each. Getting the controls down on the 1DII. Wow, they are different than my 6D/70D. I want to shoot my grandson's spring athletic stuff with the 1DII, and compare to what I get from the 70D. Oh, the 1D (not II) manual says raws are .CRW, and I am getting the .TIF files. Thanks for putting that out, too. Having some difficulties with 580EX II, but my 430EX two works fine, so it is probably some on-flash function I have set.

One thing I am having real troubles with is: Does my wife really not notice the difference between a 6D and 1DII? Or is she silently noticing gear I buy, and planning a FREAKING HUGE SHOE BUYING BINGE! She never seems to notice when I buy new anything.

The 1D control system is way, way different from today's stuff. Having to do two-button pressues/holds to change things and navigate is backwards compared to today's stuff, but after a while it becomes natural I found. I liked that I never accidentally changed modes, settings, or anything really.

I used the 1D2 in a dark warehouse at ISO 3200 with a moderately fast prime (90mm F2.8 VC; could have used an 85mm F1.8 for an extra stop I guess) for the FPS while the kids were playing at a birthday party.

Here's ISO 3200 in a dark gym from that 1D2:

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/01/5/LQ_772676.jpg
Image hosted by forum (772676) © MalVeauX [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Very best,

My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited over 7 years ago by MalVeauX.
     
Jan 29, 2016 11:38 |  #10

Heya,

And here's the scaling of that 8MP sensor, even at moderate ISO.

ISO 640, with a 100% crop to show how sharp those big pixels keep things, and the color and transitions of the APS-H sensor:

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/01/5/LQ_772678.jpg
Image hosted by forum (772678) © MalVeauX [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

100% crop:

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/01/5/LQ_772679.jpg
Image hosted by forum (772679) © MalVeauX [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

By the way, this printed awesome at 16x20". Blows up big just fine (doubled the scaling, 100% upsample; eyelashes still sharp on the print which is lovely).

Very best, :)

My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jan 29, 2016 11:54 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

I've probably made about 200 exposures around the house. I spent some time playing with the JPG settings and don't like what I see. I am just so used to how the Picture Styles work that I am struggling a bit. I may just stick to all raw on the 1DII. It is easier to run a standard routine on import than to dink with these archaic JPG setting. I agree with you about the no accidental settings changes. So far, well worth the money.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Jan 29, 2016 12:01 |  #12

From the 4MP ancient 1Dc, I grabbed this image one night with a bounced flash that was off camera.

From resolution it's a 4" x 5" image. But I was able to scale it to 10" and still get a great print where the eyes were still detailed (printed just slightly smaller than 10" to frame it like an 8x10.

The color and tones still are relevant compared to today's cameras. This sucker is like 15 years old!

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/01/5/LQ_772682.jpg
Image hosted by forum (772682) © MalVeauX [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Very best,

My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jan 29, 2016 12:39 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

I figured out that I must be doing something wrong with the JPG settings. I had it setup like this:

SET1: Sat +4, Cont +1
SET2: Sat +5, Cont +2
SET3: Sat -2, Cont -2 (lowest setting)

I changed the active SETn to each successive option, and took a shot. I shot JPG only and could not tell the difference between the 3 JPG shots on a 22" monitor. I set it to RAW only. The raw file looked better SOOC than any of the JPGs. Still working on this. I want to shoot that kids' athletics JPG for the buffer depth.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Jan 29, 2016 12:43 |  #14

Heya,

I never shot it JPG, the buffer handles RAW just fine I found. I commonly burst 10~12 images at at time on the 1D2 birding and it always kept up. I wouldn't worry about JPG unless you just need it. You'll slam a thousand photos real fast in a single session.

I think I remember people talking about using Lightroom to take a RAW, edit it how they want, then adjust in camera JPG options to a style and set it that way, to get the closest output so that they know what it will look like without editing, for someone that wants to shoot JPG and basically not edit it.

Just remember, these are 10~15 year old JPG engines. They're not nearly as nice to the images as today's JPG engines are. The RAW lets you process with today's JPG engines.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jan 29, 2016 12:55 as a reply to  @ MalVeauX's post |  #15
bannedPermanent ban

I agree with you. I've never hit the 16 frame buffer limit on my 70D. The likelihood of hitting 20+ frame on the 1DII with only 1FPS difference is slim. Raw it is! I don't mind. I use LR 5.7 and can easily setup some import processes. I do use my 6D/70D in JPG frequently. When shooting flash or outdoors in daylight, I use JPG. Everything else is raw.

I just got done messing with the Color Matrix stuff, too. I didn't see a bunch of difference there, either. If I had spent this much time setting up my LR Import parameters, I'd be done by now! :)

For now, I am really enjoying the HANDFUL of camera that is the 1DII.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,086 views & 1 like for this thread, 7 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Couple of 1D & 1DII questions.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1900 guests, 106 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.