Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Architecture, Real-Estate & Buildings 
Thread started 25 Jan 2016 (Monday) 20:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1st go at this

 
pawelgawel
Senior Member
308 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 29
Joined Mar 2011
     
Jan 25, 2016 20:27 |  #1

any input would be greatly appreciated!

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/01/4/LQ_772104.jpg
Image hosted by forum (772104) © pawelgawel [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/01/4/LQ_772105.jpg
Image hosted by forum (772105) © pawelgawel [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

5D3 x2 | 16-35 2.8L II | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L II | 85 1.2L II | S 50 1.4 ART | S 1.4x | YN600EXRT x3 | Bowens 400RX | Lowepro LOVE :)
flickr (external link)
urban-pixel (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jnecr
Member
Avatar
170 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 107
Joined Sep 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Post edited over 7 years ago by jnecr.
     
Jan 26, 2016 08:20 |  #2

This first pic looks like it needs to be straightened. I feel like its falling off the right side of the screen, or is it just me?

Both pics also have a good bit of distortion that makes the walls look convex. Lightroom and Photoshop have some easy options to fix these issues with most lenses. Otherwise, I like the lighting in both, perhaps the back room of the first could be brighter as it looks to have some interesting features in it..

Edit: I can now see the layout of the room. That dark portion is actually the tinted glass behind the reception desk. Ignore that remark. :)


-John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2610
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jan 26, 2016 08:38 |  #3

These are much better than most 1st shots we see. In #1, the left wall is leaning, & you should try to be aware of multiple shadows.
I might crop some off the top of #2.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mltn
Senior Member
353 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 50
Joined Sep 2010
     
Jan 26, 2016 13:55 |  #4

Pretty solid for the first attempt!

The straightening issue for the first image has been mentioned.

Both of these images are shot too wide for my taste. I don't know what your background is, but if you're coming from real estate shooting, you should think about architectural interiors differently. There's a lot of empty space in both images, so you could be tighter for those. This kind of photography should focus on the features of the space, not necessarily the size.

As a rule, I like to use the longest focal length I can to shoot a given interior to reduce distortion. Sometimes they have to be shot at 17mm for various reasons, but when I can get away with 24mm or longer, I'll do that every time.

The lighting in the second one could use some tweaking. Generally the viewer's eye will be drawn to the brightest part of an image, which in the second one is the paintings on the wall, which are overexposed. The seating area with red chairs is kind of the focal point, so maybe darken the wall with the paintings, and dodge the chairs just a bit. Play around with some tighter crops too possibly.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pawelgawel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
308 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 29
Joined Mar 2011
     
Jan 28, 2016 09:50 |  #5

^^^ thank you for all those pointers...

YES! that 1st one is too much to the right... for some reason I didn't see this. I had 30min to PP and send it to the client for a quick pitch they had to another firm.
and the advice on the light wall with painting is great, I never looked at it this way.

Seriously, thank you so much for these little detail pointers!!


5D3 x2 | 16-35 2.8L II | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L II | 85 1.2L II | S 50 1.4 ART | S 1.4x | YN600EXRT x3 | Bowens 400RX | Lowepro LOVE :)
flickr (external link)
urban-pixel (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cccc
Goldmember
Avatar
2,017 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 174
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Jan 29, 2016 10:30 |  #6

It looks like you didn't utilize any of the lens profile corrections while editing these. As mentioned, tighter crops and vertical perspective corrections would help you tremendously.

I agree with the wall art being too bright, otherwise these are really good for your first attempt!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Timza
Member
Avatar
131 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2016
     
Jan 31, 2016 13:57 |  #7

I agree that in the second the lighter part of the photograph where the paintings are and the darker part of the photograph where the smoke glass is are too interesting to my eyes. I keep looking back and forth at that and do not enter the room.

In the first one, if you were taking for the manufacturer of the sign, you would want to reduce the shadows around that.

In the first one, the wall paper on the right is slightly too over exposed. I keep wanting to see the texture in that.

What do you all think about the door and the chair legs on the left of the second one?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Timza
Member
Avatar
131 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2016
     
Jan 31, 2016 14:01 |  #8

It has been a long time since I did corrections for perspective. I used to use Lens Doc. I don't use Photoshop or Lightroom. I am thinking of getting a standalone copy of DxO ViewPoint for my perspective and distortion correction. What do you all think of that? Is there a better product you would use, or do use, to make the walls stand up vertical and make the walls straight instead of curved?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mltn
Senior Member
353 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 50
Joined Sep 2010
     
Jan 31, 2016 14:40 |  #9

Timza wrote in post #17880521 (external link)
In the first one, if you were taking for the manufacturer of the sign, you would want to reduce the shadows around that.



I think the shadows are fine and certainly some are necessary to show the depth of the lettering. It might look unnatural to remove shadows/flatten it out.

I don't use Photoshop or Lightroom.

Why don't you use Photoshop for perspective correction? Are you talking about fixing barrel distortion, or just straightening things? I generally use lens profiles for distortion correction in LR, and then I fine tune the keystone correction in PS. What advantage do you see by not using either of these programs?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Timza
Member
Avatar
131 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2016
     
Jan 31, 2016 16:01 |  #10

I agree with the shadows in the lettering, but not the shadows to the left and right of the sign, if one was photographing for the manufacturer of the sign.

I have been away from photography as a hobby for a long time. For the last several years I have been doing industrial photography with point and shoot cameras for technical reports, and worked hard to take and retake photographs onsite that did not require "post processing." I have been looking at getting a better compact camera and software to give me lens and perspective corrections, but in my mind I see myself using fairly simple equipment and stand alone specialized software.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,840 views & 2 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
1st go at this
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Architecture, Real-Estate & Buildings 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1389 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.