Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 29 Jan 2016 (Friday) 08:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Does my 5D3 look extra noisy to you?

 
Jarvis ­ Creative ­ Studios
Goldmember
Avatar
2,508 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 1107
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Johnson City, Tennessee
     
Jan 29, 2016 08:21 |  #1

This is something I've been noticing more lately, that my 5D3 seems particularly noisy. I've not sent it in to Canon yet. I always read reviews that as far as noise goes, it's barely noticeable up to about 3200 and still usable up to about 6000-10000 (depending on the review). I don't feel that's the case with mine. At 1200-1600 I feel like it's very grainy when zooming in on the picture. Here's an example from this morning. SOOC, about a 100% crop. 5D3 with 50mm 1.8 mark 1, 1/125, f5.6, ISO 250.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/01/5/LQ_772644.jpg
Image hosted by forum (772644) © Jarvis Creative Studios [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

WEBSITE (external link)
flickr (external link)
Sony ZV-1 || Sony a7RIV || Sony a9 || Sony a1 || Sony FE 20mm f1.8 G || Sony FE 24-70 f2.8 GM || Sony FE 50mm f1.2 GM || Sony FE 90mm f2.8 Macro G OSS || Sony FE 135mm f1.8 GM || Sony FE 200-600 f5.6-6.3 G OSS || Godox speedlights and strobes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Jan 29, 2016 08:25 |  #2

Heya,

You're looking at a 1:1 crop of an under-exposed area at a non-native ISO value. Looks like I would expect it to.

Looking at your Flickr, your other 5D3 images even at ISO above 1600 look clean.

Did something happen? Or are you just pixel peeping?

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jarvis ­ Creative ­ Studios
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,508 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 1107
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Johnson City, Tennessee
     
Jan 29, 2016 08:33 |  #3

MalVeauX wrote in post #17877509 (external link)
Heya,

You're looking at a 1:1 crop of an under-exposed area at a non-native ISO value. Looks like I would expect it to.

Looking at your Flickr, your other 5D3 images even at ISO above 1600 look clean.

Did something happen? Or are you just pixel peeping?

Very best,

Thanks, most likely the second, but I'm not sure. The last two gigs I had were a wedding outside on the rainiest day possible, and a proposal indoors in a dark church where I couldn't set up enough lights because of discretion. I've been looking at those pictures non stop so maybe my mind has forgotten what correct lighting and exposure look like haha.


WEBSITE (external link)
flickr (external link)
Sony ZV-1 || Sony a7RIV || Sony a9 || Sony a1 || Sony FE 20mm f1.8 G || Sony FE 24-70 f2.8 GM || Sony FE 50mm f1.2 GM || Sony FE 90mm f2.8 Macro G OSS || Sony FE 135mm f1.8 GM || Sony FE 200-600 f5.6-6.3 G OSS || Godox speedlights and strobes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ammo
Member
Avatar
208 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Cornwall, UK.
     
Jan 29, 2016 10:36 |  #4

Looks fine to me, mine is fairly bad in general - I have my Noise reduction on at 50% always.


Check me out :)
Wedding Photographer Cornwall (external link)My Facebook (external link)
My Flickr (external link)
Cornwall Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skid00skid00
Senior Member
511 posts
Likes: 43
Joined Mar 2004
     
Jan 29, 2016 20:23 |  #5

You wildly lifted the shadow areas. This is the expected result.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jan 29, 2016 20:36 |  #6

Remember one thing....

Taking a result from a camera and raising the shadows isn't the same thing as raising your ISO before the shot. Using ISO in camera will provide you an analog amplification which is better than the mathematical amplification you are doing after the fact.

So in the underexposed areas of a file, when you run sliders up to bring out the shadows, you are simply multiplying each pixel in that shadow area by the slider values, bringing up the floor noise that Canon cameras are known to have. If you had raised your exposure so that the brightest area just hit the right side of the histogram, then the shadowed buildings might pull up a little better. Even better, just do a bracketed shot and merge after the fact, or use the HDR function on the 5D3, it would work very well for this type of shot.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,747 views & 1 like for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Does my 5D3 look extra noisy to you?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1900 guests, 106 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.