Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 03 Feb 2016 (Wednesday) 02:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Long Exposure Processing - Critique

 
WildernessTracker
Member
Avatar
98 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Mar 2015
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland
     
Feb 03, 2016 02:49 |  #1

Hi Folks,

I have been getting into long exposure photography quite a bit recently and I was wondering if I could get some critique on the images below. For some reason I am not entirely satisfied with the processing I have done but I can't see the best way to correct them.

They were all taken with a 10 stop B&W an a Lee 0.6 ND Grad Soft for the Bow Fiddle Rock (image 1).

The 2nd and 3rd images are the same, just one is in B&W and the other in colour. I noticed on the colour image has some coloured vignetting in the top right, which I am guessing is a result of stacking filters?

Any advice would be appreciated (both processing and technique) and editing of these is allowed.

Cheers,
Andy

IMAGE: http://www.andymcdonaldphotography.com/Images-Sharing/_MG_0131_20160131_FB.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.andymcdonaldphotography.com/Images-Sharing/_MG_0147_20160131_FB.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.andymcdonaldphotography.com/Images-Sharing/_MG_0147_20160131_FB-2.jpg

flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)
My Gear: Canon 70D, 400D | Canon EF-S 18-135 IS STM, 18-55, 55-250 IS, 50/1.8 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 | Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Macro |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 466
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Feb 03, 2016 06:11 |  #2

IMHO the shooting technique and PP on the color ones is spot on...B&W doesn't work.
Including the shore line doesn't help the first one.
You've got the technique down pat...work the scene to come up with the perfect vantage point.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Feb 03, 2016 08:02 |  #3

chauncey wrote in post #17884097 (external link)
IMHO the shooting technique and PP on the color ones is spot on...B&W doesn't work.
Including the shore line doesn't help the first one.
You've got the technique down pat...work the scene to come up with the perfect vantage point.


Agreed. Technique and color processing look fine to me.

In the first one, I'm slightly distracted by the difference in lighting between the foreground rock and the center rock - the rock with the colorful moss in drab and shadowed. Not really something you can fix in post, but something that you could shoot at a different time of day.


You could also experiment with a slightly-overdone look, with saturation boosted up and shadows lifted to make the greens really, um, "pop" for lack of a better word.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WildernessTracker
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
98 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Mar 2015
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland
     
Feb 04, 2016 02:48 |  #4

Thanks for the comments.
I see what you both mean about the shoreline, I have tried to crop the first one into a square format and it does look a bit better but the rock still seems quite bright to me. I have tried adjusting the exposure for it but nothing is working for me.

Nathan, I did reprocess to give a "pop" effect and made the colours jump out. Also it took me a bit of time to work out how to remove the magenta cast in the top right. I eventually managed something in photoshop with masks. Much easier than in Lightroom. I can see that the original one above looks "flat" when compared to this one.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/02/1/LQ_773718.jpg
Image hosted by forum (773718) © WildernessTracker [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)
My Gear: Canon 70D, 400D | Canon EF-S 18-135 IS STM, 18-55, 55-250 IS, 50/1.8 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 | Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Macro |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Feb 04, 2016 07:36 |  #5

I like that one a lot. For this style of photography, I think unnaturally-saturated works nicely. The overall cooler/greener (less magenta) was a good idea too.

Did you try gradient filters in Lightroom?


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WildernessTracker
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
98 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Mar 2015
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland
     
Feb 04, 2016 07:41 |  #6

nathancarter wrote in post #17885450 (external link)
I like that one a lot. For this style of photography, I think unnaturally-saturated works nicely. The overall cooler/greener (less magenta) was a good idea too.

Did you try gradient filters in Lightroom?

Thanks Nathan. I did try the grads in Lightroom but I couldn't get rid of the magenta cast easily. If I can't fix it in Lightroom, Photoshop is the answer. :) Most of the adjustment work was done in Lightroom with a few bits in Photoshop.

I will try and upload my other image later on to see if the crop works.


flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)
My Gear: Canon 70D, 400D | Canon EF-S 18-135 IS STM, 18-55, 55-250 IS, 50/1.8 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 | Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Macro |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,735 views & 1 like for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Long Exposure Processing - Critique
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1217 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.