Why do you still own a 5D ?

mrgooch wrote in post #17892952
No need to look at a bargain price point.

Then add 5DIII and 5Dr to the mix. The 1DX is full frame but could hardly. E called similar. Like those above I don't really understand the question.

Tom Reichner wrote in post #17893241
.
Photos from all of these bodies basically look alike to me. In fact, if I want to know what body I used for any particular picture, I need to look at the EXIF, because there is no way I can tell by looking at an image whether it was taken with my 5D or with another body.

.

it's also a question of ISO in my opinion
Personally i easily spot the ones taken with my 7D and those taken with my 5D's above 320-640 ISO, but a very hard time to spot between 5D2 and 5D3 under 1600-2000 ISO (and often it's the luck when i spot one).

And i will say something that maybe many of you will tell me that i am crazy or make non senses, but below 320-640 ISO i found that 5D2 has a better image quality than 5D3
(OK it can be psychological because it's near 7-8 years that i have 5D2 so please do not hit me on the head )

I used 5DmkII only few times, so i can´t say, but i did similar test with my 5DmkIII and 1DsmkII and i actually like the output from 1dsmkII up to ISO 800 more.

5Dclassic has still the best SOOC raw image quality compared to other 5D series (better color reproduction, lower pixel level noise etc.. )
Simple, reliable camera and 13Mpix is just enough for everything I need.