Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 10 Feb 2016 (Wednesday) 11:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Advanced white balance issue.

 
Dan ­ Kearley
Senior Member
426 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2012
     
Feb 10, 2016 11:51 |  #1

I shot some interior photos before the renovation. Using natural light for everything except for the bathroom.. as there was NO light.

As a result, the white balance is off. But using the eyedropper to fix doesn't give me good results.
Is there a way to have the bathroom photo look the same as the kitchen? The wood 'should' be the same colour. :)

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/02/2/LQ_774846.jpg
Image hosted by forum (774846) © Dan Kearley [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/02/2/LQ_774847.jpg
Image hosted by forum (774847) © Dan Kearley [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,120 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Feb 10, 2016 12:18 |  #2

What sort of lighting did you have in the bathroom? Also what did you use for the WB dropper? It looks to me as if you have the tint slider too far to the magenta side. I would try pulling that back over to the left to reduce the magenta and add some green. many artificial light sources these days seem to have quite significant chunks of the spectrum missing, which can make getting a good WB virtually impossible, because those wavelengths of light are simply missing. I've not seen anything like this from that cause, but it could be aggravating a badly set tint slider. Sometimes the auto selection does just miss for some unkown reason, so also maybe try a different spot for you WB selection.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1556
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
Post edited over 7 years ago by kirkt. (2 edits in all)
     
Feb 10, 2016 12:19 |  #3

You probably have to edit the per-channel black level. For example, your shadow tones in the bathroom shot have a magenta-ish cast. To eliminate that cast in the shadows, you need to .... [fill in the blank!] This can happen at low exposure levels where not a lot of info lives in the original exposure and you are boosting exposure. Also, noise can cause this color shifting as well. The edit may need to be applied as a local adjustment so it does not creep into the properly rendered areas of the image.

Can you post the raw file of rate bathroom shot (via Dropbox, etc.) for use to take a shot at addressing the issue?

kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Kearley
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
426 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2012
     
Feb 10, 2016 15:34 |  #4

Interesting info. I thought I did play with the tint slider, but I'll experiment again. I was using the eyedropper in LR.

kirkt; Are you saying that the WB might not be linear from light to dark? That's pretty interesting.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Feb 10, 2016 17:49 |  #5

My guess is that it's fluorescent light and a high shutter speed, so you only got a partial cycle of the fluorescent flicker?

I might try the "skin tones by the numbers" technique, using a bit of the wood in the kitchen photo to create a reference to what your ratios SHOULD be, and a similar piece of wood in the bathroom as your target.

https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=4_wXx1Ng5ZY (external link)


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D ­ Thompson
Goldmember
Avatar
4,062 posts
Likes: 422
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Ky
     
Feb 11, 2016 09:15 |  #6

I used a Curves Adjustment Layer masked to the wood. Pretty much what Nathan posted. I took a sample RGB reading from the kitchen pic and dropped a sample point on similar wood in the bathroom. Adjusted the RGB values to match. Masked to just the woodwork.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/02/2/LQ_775046.jpg
Image hosted by forum (775046) © D Thompson [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Dennis
Canon 5D Mk III 5D 20D
I have not yet begun to procrastinate!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1556
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Feb 11, 2016 12:36 |  #7

Dan Kearley wrote in post #17893465 (external link)
...

kirkt; Are you saying that the WB might not be linear from light to dark? That's pretty interesting.


Take a look at this article:

http://www.clarkvision​.com …es/canon.raw.pr​ocessing1/ (external link)

When the WB is applied during raw conversion, the black level offsets can get scaled such that the low end of the histogram has a WB shift. If you boost this area of the histogram to reveal it in the image, then you can see this artifact. You can address this as discussed in the article - see if it is the root of the problem for you, and see if the methodology in the article helps resolve the cast.

If you are not shooting with a Canon camera, then maybe something else is going on ....

kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Feb 11, 2016 12:45 |  #8

wow.

i'd say you have some kind of camera or file problem.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 11, 2016 15:29 |  #9

This thread illustrates the immense value of simply including a neutral grey card in the scene as a reference for white balance and for density! Pull it out of the scene for the 'real shot'.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8386
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Feb 11, 2016 16:33 |  #10

.

This doesn't look like a white balance (color temperature) problem to me.
Rather, it looks like a tint problem.

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Feb 11, 2016 16:45 |  #11

Was this shot raw, or is this a JPG only result from camera? If so, what do you have set for a picture style?


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1556
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Feb 11, 2016 17:30 |  #12

I also have to say that I completely misinterpreted the original post - I though that the bathroom shot was shot with natural light but there was very little of it. Never mind! My bad, i totally screwed the pooch on this one. (I could not figure out how you got such a noise-free image!).

Duh.

Anyway, if you have the raw file to upload somewhere so we can take a look it may be worth it.

kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Kearley
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
426 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2012
     
Feb 12, 2016 00:48 |  #13

Thanks for this interesting conversation. I realize I left out a vital(?) detail though. I'm using LR/enfuse to merge 3 different exposures of each image. (I obviously didn't need it in the bathroom, but anyway)

Now, the 3 source images that feed LREnfuse are all with the same WB settings... So I don't know exactly what's going on yet. But Correcting the WB of one of these source images is way easier than with this merged one. So I assume it's part of the problem.

This plugin works great without much fiddling for the most part though.

DThompson, thanks for that description. I might experiment doing it that way for fun.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,541 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Advanced white balance issue.
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1361 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.