I will add that the egret series was shot from a moving waterboat in the Florida marshes. It was moving to the left as the bird was moving right. Not much chance to think about background. ߘ
Feb 15, 2016 12:53 | #16 I will add that the egret series was shot from a moving waterboat in the Florida marshes. It was moving to the left as the bird was moving right. Not much chance to think about background. ߘ cheers, Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dodgyexposure Goldmember More info | Feb 15, 2016 18:12 | #17 pelooyen wrote in post #17899259  I will add that the egret series was shot from a moving waterboat in the Florida marshes. It was moving to the left as the bird was moving right. Not much chance to think about background. ߘ So it is a composite? You should check in the competition rules that composite images are allowed. Cheers, Damien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Feb 15, 2016 18:26 | #18 The first two arent prize winners. The composite, as well done as it is, is a form of trickery that may not appeal to the judges. So you are left with the bike shot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I checked - it is cheers, Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 16, 2016 02:38 | #20 Based on comments, here is the latest edit - removed a bird, blurred background a bit and removed a bot of flotsam  Image hosted by forum (775948) © pelooyen [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. cheers, Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info Post edited over 7 years ago by gonzogolf. | Feb 16, 2016 08:12 | #21 As a former judge in photo competitions I would urge you not to artificially blur the background.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 16, 2016 08:15 | #22 I would prefer a slightly wider crop than has been posted - slightly tighter than the original (19x9 or 2.33:1) but I would like to see a bit more of the environment and a slight amount of sky. Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MartinDixon Slit-scan project master  More info | Feb 16, 2016 09:24 | #23 Somehow the blue of the water has come out very strongly in yur last - a bit too strong IMHO. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Sandro Bisotti 1884 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
