Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 15 Feb 2016 (Monday) 13:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Thoughts?

 
bsiegler
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 963
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
     
Feb 15, 2016 13:12 |  #1

I've been playing with speedlights. I shot this photo of my son using one Yongnuo YN600ES-RT in a Godox Octagon Softbox against a black backdrop.
Made a few adjustments in Lightroom and a bit of PP in Photoshop.


Please let me know what you like or don't like.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/02/3/LQ_775845.jpg
Image hosted by forum (775845) © bsiegler [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Feb 15, 2016 13:17 |  #2

Cropping the hood out on the side kills it for me. The framing is kind of an overdone thing but it can work, but in this case the hood forms a secondary frame but cropping the top and side just lead your eye away from his face instead of framing it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsiegler
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 963
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
     
Feb 15, 2016 13:21 |  #3

gonzogolf wrote in post #17899302 (external link)
Cropping the hood out on the side kills it for me. The framing is kind of an overdone thing but it can work, but in this case the hood forms a secondary frame but cropping the top and side just lead your eye away from his face instead of framing it.

Thanks Gonzogolf, I'll have to get him to let me try again but include the left side. I actually shot it like this and cropped the blank right side.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Feb 15, 2016 13:38 |  #4

I'm not a fan of the negative space crop in a studio shot, especially with the subject facing forward. Unless there is a reason like adding text or something later its just trying a bit too hard to be artistic.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsiegler
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 963
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
     
Feb 15, 2016 13:42 |  #5

gonzogolf wrote in post #17899319 (external link)
I'm not a fan of the negative space crop in a studio shot, especially with the subject facing forward. Unless there is a reason like adding text or something later its just trying a bit too hard to be artistic.

I was definitely trying to be artistic with this. One of my biggest fears is that I'm not very creative! My hope is if I look at enough examples and know how to shoot them, then maybe my creative juices will start flowing. All the while learning how to control light!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Feb 15, 2016 13:44 |  #6

bsiegler wrote in post #17899334 (external link)
I was definitely trying to be artistic with this. One of my biggest fears is that I'm not very creative! My hope is if I look at enough examples and know how to shoot them, then maybe my creative juices will start flowing. All the while learning how to control light!

The lighting is good,the only issue is the framing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsiegler
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 963
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
     
Feb 15, 2016 13:48 |  #7

gonzogolf wrote in post #17899335 (external link)
The lighting is good,the only issue is the framing.

Thank you, I greatly appreciate your critique!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
welshwizard1971
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Likes: 1100
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Southampton Hampshire UK
     
Feb 15, 2016 13:53 |  #8

I think the framing is subjective, I've no issues with it, but I would say the eyes look a tad soft, but the eyebrows are OK, a tad front focussed??


EOS R 5D III, 40D, 16-35L 35 ART 50 ART 100L macro, 24-70 L Mk2, 135L 200L 70-200L f4 IS
Hype chimping - The act of looking at your screen after every shot, then wildly behaving like it's the best picture in the world, to try and impress other photographers around you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsiegler
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 963
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
     
Feb 15, 2016 13:59 |  #9

welshwizard1971 wrote in post #17899346 (external link)
I think the framing is subjective, I've no issues with it, but I would say the eyes look a tad soft, but the eyebrows are OK, a tad front focussed??

Thank you, I see what you mean. I continually have a hard time with focus. I did some test shots with a Spyder Lenscal and it seemed to be acurate. I've read about focus issues with the 70D, but I shot this in manual focus.
So it's probably user error!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
welshwizard1971
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Likes: 1100
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Southampton Hampshire UK
Post edited over 7 years ago by welshwizard1971.
     
Feb 15, 2016 14:01 |  #10

It's something I suffer with as I'm a little bit obsessed with shallow DOF But, more fool me as I've missed so many good shots because of it, so I'm actively trying to stop doing it. Last shoot I double checked the DOF, then triple checked with an app, seemed to work.....

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1597/24908646002_e1c11af646_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/DX6j​DQ  (external link)

EOS R 5D III, 40D, 16-35L 35 ART 50 ART 100L macro, 24-70 L Mk2, 135L 200L 70-200L f4 IS
Hype chimping - The act of looking at your screen after every shot, then wildly behaving like it's the best picture in the world, to try and impress other photographers around you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsiegler
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 963
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
     
Feb 15, 2016 14:04 |  #11

welshwizard1971 wrote in post #17899352 (external link)
It's something I suffer with as I'm a little bit obsessed with shallow DOF But, more fool me as I've missed so many good shots because of it, so I'm actively trying to stop doing it.

I too always tend to shoot with too shallow DOF! It's funny how things look great on that little LCD and then things change on that big monitor!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Feb 15, 2016 14:08 |  #12

There is no reason to shoot shallow dof with a black background in a studio shoot.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsiegler
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 963
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
     
Feb 15, 2016 14:13 |  #13

welshwizard1971 wrote in post #17899352 (external link)
It's something I suffer with as I'm a little bit obsessed with shallow DOF But, more fool me as I've missed so many good shots because of it, so I'm actively trying to stop doing it. Last shoot I double checked the DOF, then triple checked with an app, seemed to work.....

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/DX6j​DQ  (external link)

That's adorable! Great shot.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsiegler
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
533 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 963
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
     
Feb 15, 2016 14:16 |  #14

gonzogolf wrote in post #17899364 (external link)
There is no reason to shoot shallow dof with a black background in a studio shoot.

Wouldn't anything else in the photo change if stepped down from a 6.3 to an 11?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Feb 15, 2016 14:22 |  #15

bsiegler wrote in post #17899376 (external link)
Wouldn't anything else in the photo change if stepped down from a 6.3 to an 11?

As long as the flash power changed to accommodate the reduced exposure what else in this shot would change? The backround is black so more depth of field isnt going to change, if anything it might get blacker.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,392 views & 5 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Thoughts?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1595 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.