Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 17 Feb 2016 (Wednesday) 14:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

before and after

 
dashotgun
Goldmember
Avatar
1,359 posts
Gallery: 405 photos
Likes: 2591
Joined Aug 2008
Location: The Tar Heel state
     
Feb 17, 2016 14:09 |  #1

IMAGE: http://davidsdigitalvision.zenfolio.com/img/s4/v65/p1782685125-5.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://davidsdigitalvi​sion.zenfolio.com/img/​s4/v65/p1782685125-5.jpg  (external link) on zenfolio

IMAGE: http://davidsdigitalvision.zenfolio.com/img/s9/v96/p1833844243-5.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://davidsdigitalvi​sion.zenfolio.com/img/​s9/v96/p1833844243-5.jpg  (external link) on zenfolio

process added sky blended then flattened ran nik define and sharpen. cropped and used healing brush for the branch. luminosity masks landscape sharpen and convert

You don't take a photograph, you make it. ~Ansel Adams
http://Davidsdigitalvi​sion.zenfolio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JonKline
Member
Avatar
201 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Chicago and Milwaukee, USA
     
Feb 17, 2016 14:19 |  #2

That's a ton of work! Seems like an HDR would have been easier?


Cinematographer Chicago (external link) | Milwaukee camera, lighting & grip rental (external link)
Instagram (external link) | Cameras (external link) | My Dealer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JAM
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Dec 2004
     
Feb 17, 2016 14:23 |  #3

Looks fantastic




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pknight
Goldmember
Avatar
2,693 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Feb 17, 2016 14:33 |  #4

JonKline wrote in post #17902185 (external link)
That's a ton of work! Seems like an HDR would have been easier?

It does look great. HDR would not have put clouds in the sky, nor gotten rid of the distracting branch.


Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dashotgun
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,359 posts
Gallery: 405 photos
Likes: 2591
Joined Aug 2008
Location: The Tar Heel state
     
Feb 17, 2016 17:35 as a reply to  @ pknight's post |  #5

thanks it did not take that long maybe 10-15 minutes


You don't take a photograph, you make it. ~Ansel Adams
http://Davidsdigitalvi​sion.zenfolio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M_Six
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,845 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Dec 2010
Location: East Central IL
     
Feb 17, 2016 19:18 |  #6

Very nicely done.


Mark J.
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Feb 17, 2016 19:28 |  #7

Nice comparison that shows the importance of learning to process images (and nicely done work, too).

I did a similar comparison for the mother in law last tome she was visiting. She was complaining that her images never looked as nice as most of mine, so I pulled a well framed and focused image from her archive and ran about 60s worth of LR tweaks on it to touch it up and she was blown away.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Feb 18, 2016 03:17 |  #8

PP is very well done...as hindsight, I might have worked the scene a bit more to get rid of the foliage.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Feb 18, 2016 06:55 |  #9

Nice job of processing. As to the comment about a lot of work. Not hard, really. Topaz filters are pretty easy to use and quick.

I think HDR would have introduced noise into the sky,

Looks like you also got rid of some CA on the profile edge of the mountain.


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidWatts
Goldmember
Avatar
2,524 posts
Gallery: 128 photos
Likes: 2617
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Chicago Area
     
Feb 19, 2016 01:17 as a reply to  @ Picture North Carolina's post |  #10

David, that is a fantastic post-processing result you have there. It has inspired me to revisit all my similar Sedona area pics from 2011 and do an update. Thanks for posting this.


My Smugmug site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nigi
Member
Avatar
131 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 137
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Burton on Trent UK
     
Apr 14, 2016 13:33 |  #11

Sorry, but for me lighting on the sky is from different direction or time of the day and possibly lens angle then lighting on the rocks, making it look fake. Try to build collection of skies from different light angles, times of the day and lens lengths, then you will be able to match any scenario.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flyfisher
Goldmember
Avatar
1,157 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Ma, USA
     
Apr 22, 2016 10:23 |  #12

I likt the processing I might have done a little more in the lower left where the three trees come up into the photo


Steve

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DagoImaging
Goldmember
Avatar
1,997 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 1327
Joined Nov 2012
     
Apr 22, 2016 12:22 |  #13

Another step to take would be to take the background, duplicate it and place that on the top of the foreground layer. Then Guassian blur it to get rid of hard details of the clouds but retain colors. Then change the blend mode to it to overlay the colors to help match the sky colors, this helps sell the image as authentic.


Sony a7R3a/a6300/ 16-70/4 / 70-200/4 G / 12-24/4 G/ 24-105/4 G /Sony HVL-60M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dashotgun
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,359 posts
Gallery: 405 photos
Likes: 2591
Joined Aug 2008
Location: The Tar Heel state
     
Apr 22, 2016 15:21 as a reply to  @ DagoImaging's post |  #14

interesting edit I will have to try it


You don't take a photograph, you make it. ~Ansel Adams
http://Davidsdigitalvi​sion.zenfolio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,448 views & 1 like for this thread, 12 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
before and after
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1022 guests, 108 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.