process added sky blended then flattened ran nik define and sharpen. cropped and used healing brush for the branch. luminosity masks landscape sharpen and convert
dashotgun Goldmember More info | Feb 17, 2016 14:09 | #1 IMAGE LINK: http://davidsdigitalvision.zenfolio.com/img/s4/v65/p1782685125-5.jpg process added sky blended then flattened ran nik define and sharpen. cropped and used healing brush for the branch. luminosity masks landscape sharpen and convert You don't take a photograph, you make it. ~Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JonKline Member More info | Feb 17, 2016 14:19 | #2 That's a ton of work! Seems like an HDR would have been easier? Cinematographer Chicago
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JAM Hatchling 2 posts Joined Dec 2004 More info | Feb 17, 2016 14:23 | #3 Looks fantastic
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 17, 2016 14:33 | #4 JonKline wrote in post #17902185 That's a ton of work! Seems like an HDR would have been easier? It does look great. HDR would not have put clouds in the sky, nor gotten rid of the distracting branch. Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thanks it did not take that long maybe 10-15 minutes You don't take a photograph, you make it. ~Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Feb 17, 2016 19:28 | #7 Nice comparison that shows the importance of learning to process images (and nicely done work, too). - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2016 03:17 | #8 PP is very well done...as hindsight, I might have worked the scene a bit more to get rid of the foliage. The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PictureNorthCarolina Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops! 9,318 posts Likes: 248 Joined Apr 2006 Location: North Carolina More info | Feb 18, 2016 06:55 | #9 Nice job of processing. As to the comment about a lot of work. Not hard, really. Topaz filters are pretty easy to use and quick. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
David, that is a fantastic post-processing result you have there. It has inspired me to revisit all my similar Sedona area pics from 2011 and do an update. Thanks for posting this.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 14, 2016 13:33 | #11 Sorry, but for me lighting on the sky is from different direction or time of the day and possibly lens angle then lighting on the rocks, making it look fake. Try to build collection of skies from different light angles, times of the day and lens lengths, then you will be able to match any scenario.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 22, 2016 10:23 | #12 I likt the processing I might have done a little more in the lower left where the three trees come up into the photo Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 22, 2016 12:22 | #13 Another step to take would be to take the background, duplicate it and place that on the top of the foreground layer. Then Guassian blur it to get rid of hard details of the clouds but retain colors. Then change the blend mode to it to overlay the colors to help match the sky colors, this helps sell the image as authentic. Sony a7R3a/a6300/ 16-70/4 / 70-200/4 G / 12-24/4 G/ 24-105/4 G /Sony HVL-60M
LOG IN TO REPLY |
interesting edit I will have to try it You don't take a photograph, you make it. ~Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1022 guests, 108 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||