I took candids at my friend's wedding in August 2005. Thoughts? It was very candid and hard light to shoot - bright in one side from the sun coming into the room, dimly on the other side. I am guessing that a better flash in the future will help?
staciecd Goldmember 1,383 posts Joined Feb 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD More info | Mar 07, 2006 21:09 | #1 I took candids at my friend's wedding in August 2005. Thoughts? It was very candid and hard light to shoot - bright in one side from the sun coming into the room, dimly on the other side. I am guessing that a better flash in the future will help? ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rlhphotos Senior Member 545 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: Coralville, IA More info | Mar 07, 2006 21:12 | #2 The lighting in the photos isnt to bad at all. :: Call Me Rob ::
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 07, 2006 21:16 | #3 These were the best two out of 50. I have a whole new respect for wedding photographers after that wedding. ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Mar 07, 2006 21:24 | #4 The lighting looks fine to me! Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
VanceW Member 209 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: San Leon Texas (just south of Houston) More info | Mar 07, 2006 21:54 | #5 Looks fine to me as well. Vance White
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MALI Senior Member 430 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Bloomington, IN More info | Mar 07, 2006 22:58 | #6 staciecd wrote: I took candids at my friend's wedding in August 2005. Thoughts? Go easy with the flash. Try Av and a softbox. You will like it. Canon 20D, 10-22, 24-70L,70-200L f/2.8 IS, 580 EX, RS-80N3, EP-EX15, BG-E2, E1.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 08, 2006 10:35 | #7 No, I haven't tried shooting RAW yet. ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kamra Member 102 posts Joined Jan 2006 More info | May 06, 2006 01:53 | #8 The 20d shoots raw and large at the same time. Try that setting next time but have plenty of memory as you make double images. It saved me from a near didaster do to faulty lighting. TONY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | May 06, 2006 09:48 | #9 If you don't understand what's going on shoot RAW + JPG. If you understand what's going on then you don't need my opinion. If you have no idea shoot RAW and ask us later. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BLINN Senior Member 587 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: Coniston, Ontario More info | May 08, 2006 09:29 | #10 WOW she has short fingers MBCL Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 08, 2006 09:33 | #11 I took pictures this weekend at another friend's wedding and wanted to shoot RAW, but didn't due to space on the memory cards. But I do want to start shooting RAW more. ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1747 guests, 110 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||