Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 02 Mar 2016 (Wednesday) 20:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

trying out a new processing style

 
mike_311
Checking squirrels nuts
3,761 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 570
Joined Mar 2011
     
Mar 02, 2016 20:45 |  #1

i love how it looks for bridges, not sure how it works for portraits :\

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/03/1/LQ_779018.jpg
Image hosted by forum (779018) © mike_311 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/03/1/LQ_779019.jpg
Image hosted by forum (779019) © mike_311 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
www.michaelalestraphot​ography.com (external link)
Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | About me

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14870
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 02, 2016 20:46 |  #2

I'm not a fan of the muddy blacks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Martin ­ Dixon
Slit-scan project master
Avatar
1,867 posts
Gallery: 59 photos
Likes: 276
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Ealing
     
Mar 03, 2016 05:52 |  #3

Looks like a fog applied over a decent image, sorry.


flickr (external link) Editing OK (external link) www.slitcam.com (free slit-scan utility) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drmaxx
Goldmember
1,281 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Jul 2010
     
Mar 03, 2016 06:05 |  #4

Well made - but I have to agree with the others: Not appealing to me.


Donate if you love POTN

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 466
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Mar 03, 2016 06:22 |  #5

Take some time and watch television, especially the commercials...that is the style that you should emulate.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_311
THREAD ­ STARTER
Checking squirrels nuts
3,761 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 570
Joined Mar 2011
     
Mar 03, 2016 06:46 |  #6

thanks for the input. i was just trying out something different. i had doubts myself and the comments so far appear to confirm that.


Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
www.michaelalestraphot​ography.com (external link)
Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | About me

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mamaof2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Mar 03, 2016 07:26 |  #7

I am going to have to disagree with others. I like the matte look on some (not all) pictures. The 2nd one I like best.


Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited over 7 years ago by Left Handed Brisket. (2 edits in all)
     
Mar 03, 2016 07:39 |  #8

i think you squashed the blacks too much. I took the image into Photoshop and the darkest parts are at the 3/4 tones (75% black) which is too far. If you only took them down to 85-90 percent the same effect can be achieved but you still have an image that retains more contrast.

generally there are two things to consider when going for this look, 1) getting rid of some shadow detail, which can be done even with 100% black still in the image, 2) moving the black point down a little, but if you go to far it just looks grey.

also, i'm not a fan of the top and bottom "fade" on the second image, it would probably be stronger without it.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mamaof2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Mar 03, 2016 07:55 |  #9

Agree on the top and bottom fade!


Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_311
THREAD ­ STARTER
Checking squirrels nuts
3,761 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 570
Joined Mar 2011
Post edited over 7 years ago by mike_311. (2 edits in all)
     
Mar 03, 2016 08:49 |  #10

The top and bottom fade is actually lens flare. the sun was right over the bush behind her. the shade form the bush actually created an hazy area in the flare pattern which is more apparent in color.

the intended to squash the crush the blacks that much. i lifted the black end of gamma curve and then modified the curve to pull the blacks down. the style is intended to match an editing preset in google photos which yields interesting results in some of my bridge pictures but i wasn't sure how it would work for portraits. maybe if i used an image that had stronger shadow lines and not on an image intended to be "pretty".

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/03/1/LQ_779091.jpg
Image hosted by forum (779091) © mike_311 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
www.michaelalestraphot​ography.com (external link)
Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | About me

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hannya
Goldmember
Avatar
1,062 posts
Likes: 66
Joined Apr 2008
Location: UK
     
Mar 03, 2016 11:14 |  #11

I prefer the color version! Nice.


“Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson

Sports Pics (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mamaof2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Mar 03, 2016 11:29 |  #12

mike_311 wrote in post #17921811 (external link)
The top and bottom fade is actually lens flare. the sun was right over the bush behind her. the shade form the bush actually created an hazy area in the flare pattern which is more apparent in color.

the intended to squash the crush the blacks that much. i lifted the black end of gamma curve and then modified the curve to pull the blacks down. the style is intended to match an editing preset in google photos which yields interesting results in some of my bridge pictures but i wasn't sure how it would work for portraits. maybe if i used an image that had stronger shadow lines and not on an image intended to be "pretty".
Hosted photo: posted by mike_311 in
./showthread.php?p=179​21811&i=i191270796
forum: Critique Corner


I like the color better


Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kjonnnn
Goldmember
1,216 posts
Likes: 147
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Mar 03, 2016 13:21 as a reply to  @ mamaof2's post |  #13

Nice. Its a kool contemporary style. Watch your conversion to black and white over skin, it can make it blotchy in some cases.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DThriller
Goldmember
Avatar
2,057 posts
Gallery: 89 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 3033
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Rhode Island
     
Mar 03, 2016 15:24 |  #14

Was the haze in the corners in camera?

The color is way better. The b&w was loking too instagram filter for me.


http://www.facebook.co​m/DPhillipsStudios (external link)
http://DPhillipsStudio​s.com (external link)
@DPhillipsStudios
YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.co​m …/UCgAZ5-OKdg1YXONAjGu91zQ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
olafs ­ osh
I am a nice and fluffy dude
Avatar
1,933 posts
Gallery: 146 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 649
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Latvia and Lithuania
     
Mar 05, 2016 03:28 |  #15

Mike, do the testing with another image. This now ain't working for couple reasons:
1. it was not made with B/W in mind;
2. not good;
...
8. no profit :]

Cheers!


- Olafs Osh
fb (external link) | instagram (external link) | YT (external link)|OLAFSOSH.COM (external link)|
Give us "Street Photography" sub-forum in P.O.T.N. !

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,106 views & 1 like for this thread, 15 members have posted to it and it is followed by 10 members.
trying out a new processing style
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1317 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.