Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Forum FAQ and Information Forum Talk 
Thread started 05 Mar 2016 (Saturday) 05:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Naughty words filter could do with being a bit smarter

 
sploo
premature adulation
2,668 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 645
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Mar 05, 2016 05:32 |  #1

I'd just started a post (quoting another post) so I was surprised to get a warning "PREVIEW NOTICE: idiot: You used the word idiot..."

In context, the original post was somewhat self deprecating, and talking about buying "idiotically expensive lenses", but I accept it's not trivial to code logic to detect the nature of use. However, as the text was within a

[QUOTE][/QUOTE]
block it's obviously not the words of the current poster (i.e. me).

Would it not make sense to disable the parsing for quoted text?

Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 7 years ago by CyberDyneSystems.
     
Mar 05, 2016 12:03 |  #2

Would it not make sense to disable the parsing for quoted text?


I don't think so. (unless I am missing your meaning)
If the filter takes out a word we don't want to see on the forum for whatever reason, then we would not want it to show right back up in a quote. (just my P.O.V.)

The wording of the "PREVIEW NOTICE" is the part that makes a quoted situation notice seem out of place. Not the filter itself IMHO.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,909 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16339
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Mar 05, 2016 13:38 |  #3

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #17924492 (external link)
If the filter takes out a word we don't want to see on the forum for whatever reason, then we would not want it to show right back up in a quote.

So is the preview notice inseparable from the filter? That is, is it impossible to disable the notice for filtered words in a quote but still filter them?


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | Comments welcome
Progress toward a new forum being developed by POTN members:
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1531051

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sploo
THREAD ­ STARTER
premature adulation
2,668 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 645
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Mar 05, 2016 16:20 |  #4

OhLook wrote in post #17924616 (external link)
So is the preview notice inseparable from the filter? That is, is it impossible to disable the notice for filtered words in a quote but still filter them?

It's "just" code, so any combination of behaviour would be possible. I guess it would make sense if the preview warning indicated that the problem word was in quoted text.

It's also interesting it grepped "idiot" from "idiotically". I hope it doesn't flag up Scunthorpe ;)


Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,909 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16339
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Mar 05, 2016 17:30 |  #5

sploo wrote in post #17924735 (external link)
It's also interesting it grepped "idiot" from "idiotically". I hope it doesn't flag up Scunthorpe ;)

Quoting your last sentence doesn't bring forth the preview warning. The warning has come up for similar letter combinations when I typed "brush it off" or something, I forget what. Not recently, though. Maybe the filter was adjusted sometime.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | Comments welcome
Progress toward a new forum being developed by POTN members:
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1531051

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMember
Goldmember
3,019 posts
Likes: 1130
Joined Nov 2009
     
Mar 06, 2016 04:39 |  #6
bannedPermanently

sploo wrote in post #17924735 (external link)
I hope it doesn't flag up Scunthorpe ;)

Or Penistone. :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sploo
THREAD ­ STARTER
premature adulation
2,668 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 645
Joined Nov 2011
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
     
Mar 06, 2016 04:59 |  #7

OhLook wrote in post #17924812 (external link)
Quoting your last sentence doesn't bring forth the preview warning. The warning has come up for similar letter combinations when I typed "brush it off" or something, I forget what. Not recently, though. Maybe the filter was adjusted sometime.

I've just had an amusing minute; typing rude words into a reply, and can confirm the filter is working, but "idiot" doesn't seem to be flagged any more in a quote. Great. Now I can insult loads of people ;-)a

(Strangely, it doesn't pick it up above in a reply when in quotes, but if I use it without quotes it does).
(Oh wait... and now it doesn't! Maybe it's just gotten bored of my immaturity...)

john crossley wrote in post #17925226 (external link)
Or Penistone. :lol:

Indeed.

Sadly I can't find a reference, but there was a story some years ago about a TV p*rn blocker that would blank the picture if it detected large amounts of skin tones. Apparently it would consistently block clips of Murray Walker (https://en.wikipedia.o​rg/wiki/Murray_Walker (external link)) talking to camera :mrgreen:


Camera, some lenses, too little time, too little talent

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,250 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Naughty words filter could do with being a bit smarter
FORUMS Forum FAQ and Information Forum Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1323 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.