Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 14 Mar 2016 (Monday) 15:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sharpening/noise reduction ...which first?

 
don1163
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Likes: 1808
Joined May 2015
Location: Washford, Somerset/ UK
     
Mar 14, 2016 15:50 |  #1

I am not very educated when it comes to processing.. I do most my processing in Lightroom and get acceptable results but was wondering, should noise reduction be done before or after sharpening is applied? And also what is the best order to use the adjustments? White balance,contrast,black​s,whites etc.
I would like to improve my processing to get the best from my images...
Many thanks..


1DX, 500L f4, 70-200L f2.8II, 100L f2.8 macro ,16-35 f4, 1.4xIII, Metz 64-AF1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Mar 14, 2016 15:58 |  #2

don1163 wrote in post #17935243 (external link)
I am not very educated when it comes to processing.. I do most my processing in Lightroom and get acceptable results but was wondering, should noise reduction be done before or after sharpening is applied? And also what is the best order to use the adjustments? White balance,contrast,black​s,whites etc.
I would like to improve my processing to get the best from my images...
Many thanks..

Heya,

Before any editing at all, I would do whatever noise reduction you feel you need first. All other edits come after that.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agedbriar
Goldmember
Avatar
2,657 posts
Likes: 398
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Slovenia
     
Mar 14, 2016 16:14 |  #3

The rule is: first NR, then sharpening, because sharpening tends to enhance the noise that you already have. That's fine if you want to reduce noise to zero.

But if you want to do only as little NR as strictly necessary (as I do - to preserve detail and image structure), you can only do it as the last step, checking the result in real time. Any sharpening after that would again change the noise look and blow your NR fine tuning.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Mar 14, 2016 16:32 |  #4

I always do NR, first, so as to not sharpen the noise. That said, LR does not specifically apply changes in order. So, either way you should get the same end product; you can always try it out and see, since LR is non-destructive. Just make a virtual copy of your image and process it both ways.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bpalermini
Goldmember
Avatar
1,795 posts
Gallery: 197 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1292
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Ashland, Oregon
     
Mar 14, 2016 16:57 |  #5

My understanding and according to Lightroom guru Tim Grey (external link) it does not matter in Lightroom what order you make adjustments. Though adjustments you make later may have an impact on earlier settings but since LR is non-destructive you can just go back and change the setting you don't like anymore.


Bob
R6II, R6, EF 16-35L II 2.8, EF 24-70L II 2.8, RF 50 1.8, EF 100L Macro 2.8, RF 70-200L 2.8, EF 100-400L II, EF 200-400L 4, EF 1.4xIII, EF 2xIII, 580EXII, YN560IV, RRS TVC23 + BH55, Fuji X-E2, Fuji X30, LRCC, PSCC
My Web Site (external link) | My Sports Portfolio (external link) | Instagram @bobpal

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50979
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Mar 14, 2016 17:12 |  #6

I tend to work from top to bottom in the develop pane, which might not be optimal, but after the first pass, I go back to fix things that to me stand out, and that can proceed in any order.

Thus fixing the blacks usually requires a subsequent exposure adjustment - and sharpening often needs noise control. I will do back and forth as necessary between noise and sharpening... and then a day later it doesn't look right, so I trim it some more.

As usual, no rules in photography.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,118 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1681
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Mar 14, 2016 18:46 |  #7

Archibald wrote in post #17935320 (external link)
I tend to work from top to bottom in the develop pane, which might not be optimal, but after the first pass, I go back to fix things that to me stand out, and that can proceed in any order.

Thus fixing the blacks usually requires a subsequent exposure adjustment - and sharpening often needs noise control. I will do back and forth as necessary between noise and sharpening... and then a day later it doesn't look right, so I trim it some more.

As usual, no rules in photography.

This is also my approach, with a couple of passes through the system, coupled with a bit of back and forth as I am going along. As others have said in LR/ACR, and I think most other parametric RAW processing programs, it doesn't really matter what order you make changes too the settings in the program always applies the editing to the image in the same way when the images are exported in a raster/bitmap format.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
don1163
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Likes: 1808
Joined May 2015
Location: Washford, Somerset/ UK
     
Mar 14, 2016 18:57 |  #8

Thanks for your responses guys...I have been applying noise reduction as the last step. I will now try to use it earlier on and see what difference it makes..
Thanks again..


1DX, 500L f4, 70-200L f2.8II, 100L f2.8 macro ,16-35 f4, 1.4xIII, Metz 64-AF1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,634 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2056
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Mar 15, 2016 00:37 |  #9

The whole issue of Sharpening vs Noise Reduction is from pixel editors like Photoshop, where an adjustment is applied to the image immediately (so it is best to remove noise before sharpening). Lightroom is different. It doesn't make any difference which you apply first because, as mentioned above, LRs adjustments are only actually applied when you export an image, at which point you have no control over the order they are applied in.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Mar 15, 2016 01:47 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

Order doesn't matter in LR. You can prove this very simply. Start with raw shot. Make a virtual copy. Process the first one from the top down, while recording the adjustments. Manually apply those same adjustments from the bottom up on the virtual copy. End result: two identically processed identical photos. Order is irrelevant in LR. I've been using LR since v3. It has always behaved like this. I don't understand the confusion.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
don1163
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Likes: 1808
Joined May 2015
Location: Washford, Somerset/ UK
     
Mar 15, 2016 09:58 |  #11

Bassat wrote in post #17935839 (external link)
Order is irrelevant in LR. I've been using LR since v3. It has always behaved like this. I don't understand the confusion.

There is no confusion , everyone that has posted about Lightroom here has said the order is irrelevant....


1DX, 500L f4, 70-200L f2.8II, 100L f2.8 macro ,16-35 f4, 1.4xIII, Metz 64-AF1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Mar 15, 2016 10:04 |  #12

don1163 wrote in post #17936077 (external link)
There is no confusion , everyone that has posted about Lightroom here has said the order is irrelevant....

Then that means sharpening and noise reduction are occurring on the base photo and isn't cumulative, correct? That is not always ideal.

I actually employ a 3 part process. I remove "objectionable" noise first, which means I still have a bit of noise left in the image (visibly so). The first round of noise reduction occurs on each color channel, as each channel has a different noise characteristic. After this I run sharpening, and I might then run a final noise reduction afterwards, but usually a very low level not very aggressive run.

I use Photoshop though.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
don1163
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Likes: 1808
Joined May 2015
Location: Washford, Somerset/ UK
     
Mar 15, 2016 10:17 as a reply to  @ TeamSpeed's post |  #13

I tend to use Lightroom more often as it suits me better.. But I will try your approach when I use Photoshop again.. I used to use Photoshop all the time but since getting Lightroom I rarely use it...
I appreciate your input as I know you are good at getting low noise at higher ISO settings..


1DX, 500L f4, 70-200L f2.8II, 100L f2.8 macro ,16-35 f4, 1.4xIII, Metz 64-AF1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,437 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4528
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt. (5 edits in all)
     
Mar 15, 2016 10:56 |  #14

bpalermini wrote in post #17935306 (external link)
My understanding and according to Lightroom guru Tim Grey (external link) it does not matter in Lightroom what order you make adjustments. Though adjustments you make later may have an impact on earlier settings but since LR is non-destructive you can just go back and change the setting you don't like anymore.

On virtual copies of the same horridly underexposed images (post process +2.5 EV Exposure setting) from a Canon 5D, these crops of about 1/4 of the frame area, in LR I did Luminance=90, Sharpen=90:
Sharpen first, then Luminance noise next...

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/Principles/sharp%20lumin_zpswo5rjqvl.jpg

Luminance noise first, then Sharpen next...

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/Principles/lumin%20sharp_zpsxloiwo3u.jpg

Then in a virtual copy JPG export with no Luminance or Sharpen settings in LR, in Paintshop Pro I altered same two settings (without any attempt to optimize either one):

Sharpen first, then Digital noise removal next...

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/Principles/PS%20sharp%20lumin_zpsiychoery.jpg

Digital noise removal first, then Sharpen next...

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/Principles/PS%20lumin%20shart_zpshwodlznv.jpg

My conclusion from this test is that if using LR, it does not matter which comes first; but if using PaintShop Pro, it DOES matter and first Sharpen is better result than Digital Noise Reduction first!

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Mar 15, 2016 11:52 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #15

I gleaned from your post to never use Paintshop Pro, neither method yields good results. :)


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

12,540 views & 12 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it and it is followed by 6 members.
Sharpening/noise reduction ...which first?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
748 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.