Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 21 Mar 2016 (Monday) 00:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6D vs 5DS r - Sharpness, resized?

 
icor1031
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 307
Joined Jan 2015
Post edited over 7 years ago by icor1031.
     
Mar 21, 2016 00:40 |  #1

Looking here, the 5DS R is sharper even with the image is resized to match the 6D (effectively dropping pixels down to equal 6D.)
http://www.dpreview.co​m/reviews/canon-eos-5ds-sr/8 (external link)

But, looking here they are almost identical (and due to better lighting when the shot was taken, better on the 6D.) Make sure you resize in your browser so they're the same size.
http://216.18.212.226 …ES/E5DSRhSLI001​00NR2D.JPG (external link)
vs
http://216.18.212.226 …RES/E6DhSLI0001​00NR2D.JPG (external link)


-------

So, what is it? Is the 5Ds R better when the images are resized to be equal? Is there a fair comparison anywhere?
(I have capable lenses.)


Canon 5Ds || Zeiss Sonnar 135/2 || Zeiss Otus 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 50/1.4 || Tamron SP 35/1.4
Ideal Portraits (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Mar 21, 2016 05:50 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

Sensors only record light the glass allows through. My 450D (XSi) and 5Dc were perfectly capable of better-than-the-eye-can-see sharpness. Both were 12MP and that was 10 years ago. I can't believe the sensor matters all that much in a modern DSLR. Sensor sharpness? Really?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
Avatar
6,772 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 10455
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Florida
     
Mar 21, 2016 07:28 |  #3

Seriously?

Here, lets get them both under a microscope so we can really dig into the differences. :rolleyes:

...heaven help me..


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/147975282@N06 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Mar 21, 2016 07:43 |  #4

Do you need the high resolution, and have the budget? Get the 5DSR....
Otherwise consider any of the other FF bodies out there, 6D, 5D3, etc.

They are all going to give you the sharpness you are looking for with good glass, there is no reason to pixel peep.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
icor1031
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 307
Joined Jan 2015
     
Mar 21, 2016 10:36 |  #5

I don't understand the sarcasm.. I doubted the extra res mattered, but I asked people that know better; more importantly, I thought the lack of an AA filter might have an impact on image sharpness even resized to 1920x1080 or 2560x1440....


Canon 5Ds || Zeiss Sonnar 135/2 || Zeiss Otus 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 50/1.4 || Tamron SP 35/1.4
Ideal Portraits (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Mar 21, 2016 11:08 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

My guess is the 3 responders in this thread have about 100years of combined experience behind the viewfinder, which means of course, that we know nothing.

Get past the sharpness hangup. It will improve your work.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
icor1031
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 307
Joined Jan 2015
     
Mar 21, 2016 11:11 |  #7

Bassat wrote in post #17943103 (external link)
My guess is the 3 responders in this thread have about 100years of combined experience behind the viewfinder, which means of course, that we know nothing.

Get past the sharpness hangup. It will improve your work.

Also saves me 2.5k because I can get an extra 6D instead of a 5Ds R :-D


Canon 5Ds || Zeiss Sonnar 135/2 || Zeiss Otus 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 50/1.4 || Tamron SP 35/1.4
Ideal Portraits (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Xyclopx
Goldmember
1,714 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 202
Joined Jul 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Xyclopx.
     
Mar 22, 2016 13:09 |  #8

icor1031v2 wrote in post #17942700 (external link)
Looking here, the 5DS R is sharper even with the image is resized to match the 6D (effectively dropping pixels down to equal 6D.)
http://www.dpreview.co​m/reviews/canon-eos-5ds-sr/8 (external link)

But, looking here they are almost identical (and due to better lighting when the shot was taken, better on the 6D.) Make sure you resize in your browser so they're the same size.
http://216.18.212.226 …ES/E5DSRhSLI001​00NR2D.JPG (external link)
vs
http://216.18.212.226 …RES/E6DhSLI0001​00NR2D.JPG (external link)


-------

So, what is it? Is the 5Ds R better when the images are resized to be equal? Is there a fair comparison anywhere?
(I have capable lenses.)

i'm not sure what the point is of such a comparison. why would you downsize the 5dsr images? if anything you would upsize the 6d images, and i'm sure after that there's no comparison.

Bassat wrote in post #17943103 (external link)
My guess is the 3 responders in this thread have about 100years of combined experience behind the viewfinder, which means of course, that we know nothing.

Get past the sharpness hangup. It will improve your work.

yeah, sharpness in itself isn't usually that important. but the sharpness combined with the high 50mp resolution could vastly improve your work as it offers a humongoid advantage: crazy cropability. the 5dsr made the most significant impact to my work out of all the purchases i made in the last several years.

use one. it'll blow your mind how much more creative you can get with it.


Dean Chiang (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear (external link)
My Photos (external link)
Instagram @xyclopx (external link) @feetandeyes (external link) @gastramour (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,120 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Mar 22, 2016 19:07 |  #9

Xyclopx wrote in post #17944515 (external link)
i'm not sure what the point is of such a comparison. why would you downsize the 5dsr images? if anything you would upsize the 6d images, and i'm sure after that there's no comparison.

yeah, sharpness in itself isn't usually that important. but the sharpness combined with the high 50mp resolution could vastly improve your work as it offers a humongoid advantage: crazy cropability. the 5dsr made the most significant impact to my work out of all the purchases i made in the last several years.

use one. it'll blow your mind how much more creative you can get with it.

Yes I really would love a 5DS for my airshow work, where I am usually FL limited at 600mm, even on an APS-C sensor. This is the first digital camera with a 35mm format sensor that I would actually consider. I would still be happy to crop down to leave just 15×10mm of sensor, as I have to do with my current camera, and I would still have more pixels than I get with my 50D. I would also get to leave the zoom at 600mm until the image filled the full 36×24mm sensor before having to zoom out. I currently find that my 50D has both ample buffer depth, and a high enough frame rate (I usually shoot bursts on Low speed) that I don't think the 5DS would be a disadvantage. Well except the price I suppose, and I need a new computer anyway, the old one really is now suffering it's death throws.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Xyclopx
Goldmember
1,714 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 202
Joined Jul 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Mar 22, 2016 19:23 |  #10

BigAl007 wrote in post #17944961 (external link)
Yes I really would love a 5DS for my airshow work, where I am usually FL limited at 600mm, even on an APS-C sensor. This is the first digital camera with a 35mm format sensor that I would actually consider. I would still be happy to crop down to leave just 15×10mm of sensor, as I have to do with my current camera, and I would still have more pixels than I get with my 50D. I would also get to leave the zoom at 600mm until the image filled the full 36×24mm sensor before having to zoom out. I currently find that my 50D has both ample buffer depth, and a high enough frame rate (I usually shoot bursts on Low speed) that I don't think the 5DS would be a disadvantage. Well except the price I suppose, and I need a new computer anyway, the old one really is now suffering it's death throws.

Alan

yeah, unfortunately even 50mp is only similar in pixel density as the better canon crop sensors, so it wouldn't really offer more "reach", but it should allow for better composition given that you'll have more area to play with. also, as you said, you would have a little more freedom in how close the the plane can get before it no longer fits the frame.

you should get one--the amount of detail you get will blow your mind! also, personally, i found that the noise created, though similar in amount per pixel compared to the 7d2, is significantly less visible or distracting when viewed at the same sizes.


Dean Chiang (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear (external link)
My Photos (external link)
Instagram @xyclopx (external link) @feetandeyes (external link) @gastramour (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,120 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Mar 22, 2016 19:35 |  #11

Xyclopx wrote in post #17944980 (external link)
yeah, unfortunately even 50mp is only similar in pixel density as the better canon crop sensors, so it wouldn't really offer more "reach", but it should allow for better composition given that you'll have more area to play with. also, as you said, you would have a little more freedom in how close the the plane can get before it no longer fits the frame.

you should get one--the amount of detail you get will blow your mind! also, personally, i found that the noise created, though similar in amount per pixel compared to the 7d2, is significantly less visible or distracting when viewed at the same sizes.

Since I am disabled and have to live on seemingly shrinking disability benefits, since I am unable to work even part time regular hours, it will be a significant number of years until the 5DS reaches my secondhand price bracket. Unless I win big on the lotto, and I don't have money to play that anyway. I will just have to keep lusting away.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,210 views & 2 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
6D vs 5DS r - Sharpness, resized?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1689 guests, 115 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.