... and I counter those claims, even the 24-105 would beat out the 24-70ii in many scenarios.
Certainly you gest jest!

ebiggs Senior Member More info Post edited over 7 years ago by ebiggs. (2 edits in all) | Apr 09, 2016 11:23 | #91 Charlie wrote in post #17965755 ... and I counter those claims, even the 24-105 would beat out the 24-70ii in many scenarios. Certainly you gest jest! G1x, EOS 1Dx, EOS 1D Mk IV, ef 8-15mm f4L,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
idkdc Goldmember 3,230 posts Likes: 409 Joined Oct 2014 More info Post edited over 7 years ago by idkdc. (2 edits in all) | Apr 09, 2016 11:45 | #92 sploo wrote in post #17965612 How can something so simple generate so much discussion ![]() Here's the world's roughest flow chart to help (excuse the formatting; a CODE block seems to have a mind of its own):
Nailed it. Stick to the flow chart, folks. I like big cinema cameras and I can not lie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
panicatnabisco Senior Member More info Post edited over 7 years ago by panicatnabisco. (4 edits in all) | Apr 09, 2016 12:25 | #93 These were common when I used to work at borrowlenses Edit: LensRentals had the same issue https://www.lensrentals.com …mron-24-70-f2-8-vc-issue/ Canon 1DX III | 1DX | 6D II | 6D | 16-35/2.8 II | 24-70/2.8 II | 35/1.4 II | 50/1.8 | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 85/1.4 IS | 100/2.8 IS macro | 200mm f/2 | 400/2.8 IS II | 2xIII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ptcanon3ti Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 09, 2016 12:29 | #94 panicatnabisco wrote in post #17965966 These were common when I used to work at borrowlenses ![]() Edit: LensRentals had the same issue https://www.lensrentals.com …mron-24-70-f2-8-vc-issue/ Ya...I'm sure that hasnt been remedied yet. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
idkdc Goldmember 3,230 posts Likes: 409 Joined Oct 2014 More info Post edited over 7 years ago by idkdc. (2 edits in all) | Apr 09, 2016 17:32 | #95 panicatnabisco wrote in post #17965966 These were common when I used to work at borrowlenses ![]() Edit: LensRentals had the same issue https://www.lensrentals.com …mron-24-70-f2-8-vc-issue/ ptcanon3ti wrote in post #17965970 Ya...I'm sure that hasnt been remedied yet. Yup, best advice for saving money in the long run: buy once and be done instead of buying twice and spending double the money. I like big cinema cameras and I can not lie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 09, 2016 19:52 | #96 panicatnabisco wrote in post #17965966 These were common when I used to work at borrowlenses ![]() Edit: LensRentals had the same issue https://www.lensrentals.com …mron-24-70-f2-8-vc-issue/ so what do you call it when you pay a lot more and then get coating loss with one outing at the beach via sea breeze? Image hosted by forum (786372) © Charlie [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
idkdc Goldmember 3,230 posts Likes: 409 Joined Oct 2014 More info Post edited over 7 years ago by idkdc. (2 edits in all) | Apr 10, 2016 00:40 | #97 Charlie wrote in post #17966435 so what do you call it when you pay a lot more and then get coating loss with one outing at the beach via sea breeze? canon responds with user error, many users disagree: http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=19396.0 Canon literature states that every L lens (besides supertele's with a protective front element) needs a front filter to complete the weather sealing...this is the case for many lens makers out there. I like big cinema cameras and I can not lie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 10, 2016 01:17 | #98 idkdc wrote in post #17966665 Canon literature states that every L lens (besides supertele's with a protective front element) needs a front filter to complete the weather sealing...this is the case for many lens makers out there. Tamron's front / inner element dropping out because it's held in place by glue is not quite the same thing. Funny that if a tamron falls apart, it's they're fault positive, when canon has faulty coatings, it's my fault...... this has nothing to do with weather sealing. The coating deteriorated due to salt mist, the lens is completely usable, the problem exists with the coatings, not water seeping into the lens. It's in the CR thread if you wish to read it, happened to many other users. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MedicineMan4040 The Magic Johnson of Cameras More info Post edited over 7 years ago by MedicineMan4040. | Apr 10, 2016 01:34 | #99 Probably not the place but I have Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC USD that sits and sits. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 10, 2016 02:35 | #100 Charlie wrote in post #17966689 Funny that if a tamron falls apart, it's they're fault positive, when canon has faulty coatings, it's my fault...... I see, too, now. I understand where you are coming from more. You basically dislike Canon lenses in general. Explains a lot. G1x, EOS 1Dx, EOS 1D Mk IV, ef 8-15mm f4L,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 1328 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||