Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 01 Apr 2016 (Friday) 16:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What is the edit called and how do they do it?

 
mamaof2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Apr 01, 2016 16:18 |  #1

What would you call this kind of edit? How would you do it? Would be fine to do once. Thanks!

https://www.flickr.com …/in/photostream​/lightbox/ (external link)


Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Apr 01, 2016 16:51 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

Have you asked the photographer. Really interesting photo, BTW.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mamaof2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Apr 01, 2016 16:55 |  #3

Bassat wrote in post #17957347 (external link)
Have you asked the photographer. Really interesting photo, BTW.

I wrote her and hope she is willing to share. I think it is a neat edit. It is very over the top, but something different and fun.


Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_311
Checking squirrels nuts
3,761 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 570
Joined Mar 2011
     
Apr 02, 2016 14:24 |  #4

there is nothing special about the edit, just a very unique subject with great facial features and eyes. you can see the lighting used from the eyes. the dof of field is wide enough to get the face in focus but ears are out of focus.


Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
www.michaelalestraphot​ography.com (external link)
Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | About me

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_311
Checking squirrels nuts
3,761 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 570
Joined Mar 2011
Post edited over 7 years ago by mike_311.
     
Apr 02, 2016 14:26 |  #5

i shot a similar pics of my kids. 50mm, f1.8. the pic you linked was stopped down more, probably f4 or so.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/04/1/LQ_784883.jpg
Image hosted by forum (784883) © mike_311 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/04/1/LQ_784884.jpg
Image hosted by forum (784884) © mike_311 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
www.michaelalestraphot​ography.com (external link)
Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | About me

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Apr 02, 2016 16:07 |  #6

i'd say there's a good amount of photoshop there as well though...the freckles are fake...it looks like she's pretty good at providing tutorials/actions for photoshop here though:
https://bellevue-avenue.com/ (external link)

may be worth a purchase if this is something you can use over and over again...definitely is what makes the image pop


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neacail
Goldmember
Avatar
1,188 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Likes: 441
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
     
Apr 02, 2016 16:25 |  #7

mike_311 wrote in post #17958366 (external link)
there is nothing special about the edit, just a very unique subject with great facial features and eyes. you can see the lighting used from the eyes. the dof of field is wide enough to get the face in focus but ears are out of focus.

I'm having a hard time decoding the lighting. It looks like the key light is in front of the subject, and just a touch to the left, and elevated a foot or so above her (?) head. There appears to be a light used on the left side of the subject's face, as I can see highlights on the side of the face and the ear. I don't think that is the key light that is doing that. The shadows under the nose don't look right to me, based on the position of the key light. Based on the lack of shadows under the nose, I almost think a kicker was used in front of the subject. But, the shadows on the neck and along the jawline are too pronounced for a kicker/reflector to have been used. Aren't they?

How do you decipher the lighting?

mamaof2 wrote in post #17957323 (external link)
What would you call this kind of edit? How would you do it? Would be fine to do once. Thanks!

https://www.flickr.com …/in/photostream​/lightbox/ (external link)

I think it is a gorgeous photograph, and a great edit. To me, it looks like there has been a lot of work on the eyes and skin. The eyes appear to have been sharpened and most likely dodged and burned to make them pop. The really smooth skin can be done using a noise removal program. "Dfine" from the "Nik Collection" (now free . . . https://www.google.com​/nikcollection/product​s/dfine/ (external link)) has a skin smoothing/NR feature that works quite well. I sometimes use it on kids who have mild rosacea.

I could be wrong, but the rosy cheeks do not look natural to me. I suspect this is either makeup or done in post. I'm also on the fence about the freckles. I think that if makeup was used the freckles wouldn't be as pronounced as they are. I'm wondering if a freckle brush was used in post.


Shelley
Image Editing Okay

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kjonnnn
Goldmember
1,216 posts
Likes: 148
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Apr 02, 2016 17:41 |  #8

Seems simple to me. What I see is:

- downward diffused lighting
- possibly gradient map set to black and white, with the layer set on either overlay or software blend. Adjust opacity
- coloring down in the eyes. Any basic youtube video can show you that
- a young model with some skin of color.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 7 years ago by Alveric. (2 edits in all)
     
Apr 02, 2016 21:36 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

It's reminiscent of that Jill Goldberg look (ugh) that was quite the rage for a while. The lighting is just a beauty dish at the 0-45 (or a bit lower, say 0-30) position, no fill –or very minimal. There's another light(s) for the background, maybe with a gel in case the paper's not coloured already.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,580 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it and it is followed by 7 members.
What is the edit called and how do they do it?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1090 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.