Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 08 Apr 2016 (Friday) 11:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Macro tube advice

 
urbanfreestyle
I am a squirrel who loves rubbing bottles and I have Nuts in my drawers, too!
Avatar
2,060 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 228
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Exeter, Devon
Post edited over 7 years ago by urbanfreestyle.
     
Apr 08, 2016 11:38 |  #1

Hi all,
Firstly I'm sorry if this is in the wrong place but I couldn't work out where to post it.

I have started taking photos of my 120 film in order to digitise them, I have lit them from behind using opake acrylic and I'm getting great results however I am having issues getting close enough to the film without needing to crop, thus reducing quality.

I've heard I can use an extension tube* on a std lens to decrease the minimum form using distance?

I am using a Sony a6000 and have the choice of the 18-105 f4 G-series or Chinon 55 f1.7

Can anyone advise what tube* I would need to be able to focus close enough to fill the sensor?


(*thanks for the correction on terminology.)


Facebook (external link)
Canon 1D Mk IV | Canon 50mm 1.8 Mk1 | Sigma 'Bigma' 50-500 | Fuji XE1 | Helios 44/m | 50mm 1.4 | Manfrotto 055CX PRO3 | 3LT Mohawk ballhead | Lubitel 2 med format camera |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all)
     
Apr 08, 2016 13:15 |  #2

I presume you might be taking a 55-56mm wide med format area and trying to capture it onto a the A6000 23.5mm wide sensor. That is 0.43x of original size, or 1:2.33 mag ratio. OTOH, if you are trying to cram a 55-56mm vertical into 15.6mm, you have to achieve 0.279x, or 1:3.58 mag ratio.

A macro photo extension tube requires that it be placed BETWEEN the usual lens and the camera body, moving the optics away from the focal plane of the camera in order to focus on the close up subject. Depending upon the FL setting of your lens, the length of extension tube to achieve 0.43x or to achieve 0.279x will be 'it depends'. I will use the Sony lens to elaborate:

  • At 16mm FL setting of the lens, 0.43x needs 7mm extension tube and 0.279x needs a 4.5mm extension tube.
  • At 32mm FL setting of the lens, 0.43x needs 14mm extension tube and 0.279x needs a 9mm extension tube.
  • At 50mm FL setting of the lens, 0.43x needs 22mm extension tube and 0.279x needs a 14mm extension tube.



The above assumes that your primary lens is focused to Infinity. But you can focus the lens to closer distances, increasing the mag factor by modest amounts and making image larger on the sensor.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
urbanfreestyle
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am a squirrel who loves rubbing bottles and I have Nuts in my drawers, too!
Avatar
2,060 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 228
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Exeter, Devon
     
Apr 08, 2016 13:59 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #3

ok, i think this makes sense haha!

So.....

I take my a6k, put my 18-105 f4 G lens on and set my focus at 50mm, set it to something like f11 to get the sharpest shot.

If i want to fill the frame with the negative from top to bottom, leaving black (or white) boarders to the left & right i would use a 14mm extention tube?

Thanks.


Facebook (external link)
Canon 1D Mk IV | Canon 50mm 1.8 Mk1 | Sigma 'Bigma' 50-500 | Fuji XE1 | Helios 44/m | 50mm 1.4 | Manfrotto 055CX PRO3 | 3LT Mohawk ballhead | Lubitel 2 med format camera |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51009
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Apr 08, 2016 14:24 |  #4

urbanfreestyle wrote in post #17964953 (external link)
ok, i think this makes sense haha!

So.....

I take my a6k, put my 18-105 f4 G lens on and set my focus at 50mm, set it to something like f11 to get the sharpest shot.

If i want to fill the frame with the negative from top to bottom, leaving black (or white) boarders to the left & right i would use a 14mm extention tube?

Thanks.

You will need an extension tube... as Wilt points out, the size will depend on the magnification you need, and also on the focal length. The problem with most modern lenses is that their actual focal length varies with the focus setting. The markings on the lens are only true at infinity focus. Most likely when you are doing your photocopying, you won't be at infinity. Actual focal lengths are usually unknown, so it is not possible to calculate the required extension reliably. So the best thing is to get an extension tube or set of tubes and do some trials.

There are a couple of other things to be mindful of when doing macro with a zoom lens. The greater the magnification, the closer the subject will be to the front element of the lens. This may or may not be an issue in your case, but sometimes the working distance can shrink so that it is a problem. At high magnifications, the subject might actually touch the glass of the lens. The other issue is the aperture. You should be OK at f/11, but at that aperture, you will probably be diffraction-limited. You will probably get better resolution at wider apertures. Again, some tests would be in order before you do tons of work.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
urbanfreestyle
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am a squirrel who loves rubbing bottles and I have Nuts in my drawers, too!
Avatar
2,060 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 228
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Exeter, Devon
     
Apr 08, 2016 14:28 as a reply to  @ Archibald's post |  #5

so probably best to get a set like these (external link) from an online store and play?


Facebook (external link)
Canon 1D Mk IV | Canon 50mm 1.8 Mk1 | Sigma 'Bigma' 50-500 | Fuji XE1 | Helios 44/m | 50mm 1.4 | Manfrotto 055CX PRO3 | 3LT Mohawk ballhead | Lubitel 2 med format camera |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51009
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Apr 08, 2016 14:30 |  #6

urbanfreestyle wrote in post #17964974 (external link)
so probably best to get a set like these (external link) from an online store and play?

Yes, but I don't know how good the Optekas are.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
urbanfreestyle
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am a squirrel who loves rubbing bottles and I have Nuts in my drawers, too!
Avatar
2,060 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 228
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Exeter, Devon
     
Apr 08, 2016 14:34 as a reply to  @ Archibald's post |  #7

sorry, i just meant like a three adapter set lol.


Facebook (external link)
Canon 1D Mk IV | Canon 50mm 1.8 Mk1 | Sigma 'Bigma' 50-500 | Fuji XE1 | Helios 44/m | 50mm 1.4 | Manfrotto 055CX PRO3 | 3LT Mohawk ballhead | Lubitel 2 med format camera |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 08, 2016 14:40 |  #8

Unlike a situation where OPTICS are involved in the add-on (e.g. teleconvertor) an extension tube does nothing optically. The difference between a 'good' vs. a 'poor' extension tube is simply how securely it mounts on the body and how securely it mounts on the lens, and whether or not it has electrical connections that retain connectivity between the lens and the body, for focus control and diaphram control. I have a $50 set of tubes that maintain the connection between body and lens even when all THREE tubes are stacked together...something that some $150-200 products will not do!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51009
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Apr 08, 2016 14:46 |  #9

A couple more (unsolicited) comments:

Scrupulously remove dust before copying.

Will your negs lie flat? If so, that's great. Usually they would lie emulsion side (dull side) down.

If they don't lie flat, use a glassless neg holder if you have one, or maybe rig one up. Glassless is great because it avoids newton rings, and there will be 4 fewer surfaces to keep clean.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
urbanfreestyle
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am a squirrel who loves rubbing bottles and I have Nuts in my drawers, too!
Avatar
2,060 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 228
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Exeter, Devon
     
Apr 08, 2016 14:48 as a reply to  @ Archibald's post |  #10

sounds like a good plan, i'll get on it in the morning :-)


Facebook (external link)
Canon 1D Mk IV | Canon 50mm 1.8 Mk1 | Sigma 'Bigma' 50-500 | Fuji XE1 | Helios 44/m | 50mm 1.4 | Manfrotto 055CX PRO3 | 3LT Mohawk ballhead | Lubitel 2 med format camera |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,357 views & 1 like for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Macro tube advice
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1509 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.