Moncho wrote in post #17978198
They do seem very, very sharp! The first one has a not rounded bokeh ball. I'm guessing the aperture was a little more closed up. But you can count the lashes! I'm glad it wasn't a picture of a cat.
Will be waiting for some more.
How do you feel? Are you having buyers remorse?
A little, haven't used it enough to conclude I regret it. I still have barely gotten to use it at f/1.4, which is what I wanted it for chiefly. I hope to post a comparison of that, when I can.
I think that as long as I get many opportunities to use it @ f/1.4, I will be happy with it.
My sigma required MF this way too, because it too often missed. So, that makes me feel a lot better.
Still wish Zeiss did (good) AF, lol. At least the focus ring is obviously lighter/easier on this one than on my sonnar. I even think it's easier than the sigma's ring, but the travel is significantly longer.
I might get a new focus screen.
Canon 5Ds || Zeiss Sonnar 135/2 || Zeiss Otus 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 50/1.4 || Tamron SP 35/1.4