Well to be fair a NSX is an Acura, which competes with the Corvette dirrectly.
Honestly all the car anologies on this board are always way out of line. Doesn't even make sense to compare computets and cameras to cars.

maverick75 Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 7 years ago by maverick75. | Apr 18, 2016 15:12 | #16 Well to be fair a NSX is an Acura, which competes with the Corvette dirrectly. - Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NullMember Goldmember 3,019 posts Likes: 1130 Joined Nov 2009 More info | Apr 18, 2016 15:21 | #17 PermanentlyWell, having used both Mac's and PC's, the only conclusion I can arrive at is that a Mac cost three times as much as the equivalent PC.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Apr 18, 2016 15:22 | #18 Mac uses high quality PC parts and a custom operating system. They're no more efficient than a PC. It's personal preference. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Canonuser123 Goldmember More info | Apr 18, 2016 16:04 | #19 Jon_Doh wrote in post #17976303 Macs last forever. In 12 to 18 months that pc you built will either be burned up or something major will have broken in it or it will be slow and outdated. Meanwhile, the Mac you bought will be running like a new one. I'm sure what I said will fire up the pc fanboys, but just buy a Mac and try one because once you've used a Mac, you'll never go back.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2016 22:09 | #20 I only asked so the Mac guys can give a better understanding what is what. I can build a awesome pc in under 2 hours or less. I don't visit porn sites and use Internet on another pc that if it crashes I can repair quickly.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2016 22:18 | #21 maverick75 wrote in post #17976340 Well to be fair a NSX is an Acura, which competes with the Corvette dirrectly. Honestly all the car anologies on this board are always way out of line. Doesn't even make sense to compare computets and cameras to cars.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samsen Cream of the Crop 7,468 posts Likes: 239 Joined Apr 2006 Location: LA More info | Apr 18, 2016 22:22 | #22 Answer to initial question: "What's so god about macs besides retina display?" Weak retaliates,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
itsray Senior Member More info Post edited over 7 years ago by itsray. | Apr 18, 2016 22:24 | #23 tim wrote in post #17976358 Mac uses high quality PC parts and a custom operating system. They're no more efficient than a PC. It's personal preference.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 7 years ago by EverydayGetaway. (2 edits in all) | Apr 18, 2016 22:31 | #24 OP just opened such a can of worms... 98kellrs wrote in post #17975793 The biggest advantage is how they process images and how little resources they take to do it. You're wasting you time comparing specs between PC and Macs as they perform totally different. For example I have a early 2008 Mac, which is entry level specs of like 4gb RAM etc, yet it runs and processes the massive 50mb images my D800 makes with no troubles or annoying slowness even at 8 years old. Contrast that with Windows based machines, which clog themselves up and start to run unbearably slow after usually 3-5 years. I work with Windows machines 12 hours a day, coming home to the simplicity of the Mac is just so stress-free and a nice experience too. False, though a common claim. I had a late 2012 Mac Mini with the top level i7 and 16gb of DDR3, I bought it in 2014 (because it was the newest one available) and within a year it was running like utter garbage. It would take minutes to open up an application, particularly those from Adobe, let alone how slow it actually was while editing those files. Because I was such an avid Apple supporter I kept nay-saying my friends who were begging me to get a PC to game with them anyway, but I finally caved and bought a relative cheap rig to game with them ($400). Found out within a week that it mopped the floor with my Mac, to the point where I was completely embarrassed to have supported my Mac defense up to that point. Lumens wrote in post #17975939 I own two off the shelf Windows LapTops that were reduced to bricks with the upgrade to Win10. Not the fault of Win10, the fault of a manufacturer that build for marketing not computing. Caused me to go to Apple and I would not let go of my Macbook Pro - it is awesome. It performs at the standards I expected and was told I would get when I bought it. If I were to go back to MS then I would build my own so I could assure the hardware is built to handle the OS and software I plan to run. Or I would pick up something like a Surface, built by MS and designed to run the Operating System. MS has tons of manufacturers out there building machines, not all build to a good quality standard. Be careful what you purchase and know what you are getting. With Apple they manufacture their own hardware and do not allow third parties to make them look bad. To me I find Apple to be a safer purchase, however the Microsoft Manufacturers are putting out some really good stuff lately. As long as you stay out of Costco and Walmart (unless you really know what you want) and do your research there are some great Windows machines out there at better prices than what Apple charges. How were they reduced to bricks by Windows 10? Windows doesn't force you to upgrade your OS, they will eventually stop supporting various applications on different OS's, but that's no different from Apple. FarmerTed1971 wrote in post #17975949 To me it's the whole experience... build quality, industrial design, simple OS, beautiful GUI, sync compatibility with other devices, seamless integration with other i products, lack of virus's. My previous life was as a graphic designer so I grew up with Apple and have never looked back. Dealing with PC type gear is just a frustrating experience, for me. It's really hard to explain. It's something you have to experience. The extra cost is worth it, to me. Their build quality is usually pretty good, but not always, there are plenty of articles out there discussing various issues with various hardware they've released over the years. My Macbook for example has just about the worst case design ever... the plastic around the keyboard began cracking and flaking off after less than a year of use, at this point it looks tattered and broken down, it also had about the most brittle power cable I've ever seen on any device, I went through 2 of the Apple $60 charging cables before going with a $12 third party one which never gave me an issue (and still works 4 years later). Wilt wrote in post #17976015 Over the course of my work career, on multiple occasions I have worked for companies that had Apple products as well as those with Windows base computers. The outcome of my own prolonged experiences with both is that I find...
This. Jon_Doh wrote in post #17976303 Macs last forever. In 12 to 18 months that pc you built will either be burned up or something major will have broken in it or it will be slow and outdated. Meanwhile, the Mac you bought will be running like a new one. I'm sure what I said will fire up the pc fanboys, but just buy a Mac and try one because once you've used a Mac, you'll never go back. Yeah, no. Read above. My Mac Mini was ready to be revamped within a year, and if I ever wanted to change out it's CPU (which I would have) I'd be SOL. If I decide I want to upgrade my PC because it's lagging behind, I pop off the side panel, take off whatever component I want to replace and then toss in a new one. My PC will keep on ticking for as long as motherboards keep the same mounting holes (which will likely be a very long time). Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeftHandedBrisket Combating camera shame since 1977... More info | Apr 18, 2016 22:35 | #25 EverydayGetaway wrote in post #17976792 2012 Mac Mini stopped reading your post here ^^^ PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 7 years ago by EverydayGetaway. | Apr 18, 2016 23:01 | #26 Don't know why, specs are pretty much the same as what the iMac's were at the time. But keep telling yourself your computer was a good value, whatever floats your boat, just stop trying to convince others that it's not full of holes Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2016 23:09 | #27 It's easy -- Macs are like Canons and PCs are like Nikons. EVERYONE knows which one is better and anyone who disagrees with you is obviously a moron. Specializing in Theatrical Photography. See my work at:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2016 23:14 | #28 EverydayGetaway wrote in post #17976792 False, though a common claim. I had a late 2012 Mac Mini with the top level i7 and 16gb of DDR3, I bought it in 2014 (because it was the newest one available) and within a year it was running like utter garbage. It would take minutes to open up an application, particularly those from Adobe, let alone how slow it actually was while editing those files Stock minis are absurdly bottlenecked by hard drive performance, to a "what was Apple thinking?" degree. The 5400 rpm drives are the slowest I've ever experienced, and the fusion drive is an improvement only for people manipulating lots of tiny files (mp3, web browsing, word docs, etc), but not for photo editing that is thrashing GB worth of data. The drives decay seriously over time, not just from becoming fragmented (which you can fix with a reformat and restore) but from remapping bad sectors to the innermost, slowest part of the drive platter. It's not uncommon for one of these machines to take several minutes to boot and show the self-diagnostic progress bar every time. 5DSR, 6D, 16-35/4L IS, 85L II, 100L macro, Sigma 150-600C
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeftHandedBrisket Combating camera shame since 1977... More info | Apr 18, 2016 23:20 | #29 EverydayGetaway wrote in post #17976823 Don't know why, specs are pretty much the same as what the iMac's were at the time. But keep telling yourself your computer was a good value, whatever floats your boat, just stop trying to convince others that it's not full of holes ![]() value is subjective, despite how hard you might try, neither of us can tell the other what a good value might be for the other. PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeftHandedBrisket Combating camera shame since 1977... More info | Apr 18, 2016 23:23 | #30 AlFooteIII wrote in post #17976830 Seriously, Mac vs. PC fanboy wars have been going on for decades. You made a choice. If it works, stick with it. If it doesn't, switch. yup. PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1266 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||