Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 03 May 2016 (Tuesday) 12:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Tamron vs Sigma 150-600mm

 
guntoter
Goldmember
Avatar
2,411 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 77
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Knoxville, Tn
Post edited over 7 years ago by guntoter.
     
May 03, 2016 12:37 |  #1

I own the Tamron and used on my 5D III, I am getting good results. It does well on my 7D II also.
I am hearing that Sigma's 150-600mm might be better than the Tamron.

Does anyone have experience with both these lenses? I have a friend who is looking at these lenses and would like to know which is the best of the two.

The Sigma is much more expensive. It is worth the extra money/


Joel
GEAR
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,762 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
May 03, 2016 12:42 |  #2

are you accidentally look at the Sigma 150-600 Sport version? that is $1999
The 150-600 contemporary version is running now anywhere between $900-1100 so its basically the same price as the Tamron. I have never used the Tammy but the reason i chose the sigma is because it offered more features. The dock to adjust the focus and change the OS and focus speed settings. Plus it has 2 custom function switch settings you can program a setting for each one to set up shooting situations.


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,120 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
May 04, 2016 05:14 |  #3

I tried out the Tamron lens back in 2014 by renting one for an airshow. The lens was very nice, and at that time (August) there was no competition from Sigma. Because of the subject that I specialise in very often requires very slow shutter speeds, I usually limit myself to 1/160s having optical image stabilisation is quite important with the longer lens for me. I shot the show with the Tamron VC engaged, as I had heard that the VC in Tamron lenses could auto switch while panning. As I found out that was not the case with the 150-600 at that time. The VC when used while panning caused significant feedback problems that made any shot taken at under 1/1000 to suffer from extreme amounts of blur. It was interesting that you couldn't really see this through the viewfinder. After the show I spoke to a rep from the UK Tamron importers who confirmed that the VC could not work during panning because the electromechanical systems couldn't handle the load while moving. I know that Tamron have released a firmware fix for this, but I'm not sure if it simply disables the VC when it detects panning, so that you don't have to switch it off, or if it really enables the VC system to actually work effectively in that situation.

Since I had already had a problem with the Tamron and the VC I went out and got a Sigma 150-600 Contemporary. This lens is of a very similar construction to the Tamron, and is about the same price. The lens is IMO superior in image quality to the Tamron for static subjects, but since it has a dedicated Mode 2 for panning in the OS system it is much better in that regard, which since most of the time I am using it I am panning with slow shutter speeds. There are a lot more features available on the Sigma, especially if you get or already have a dock. The 150-600 C is the exception to the "Contemporary" line from Sigma, in that the dock options are exactly the same as for the "Sport" series lenses, so you get the OS and focus speed customisation, as well as the ability to set in lens MFA at four focal lengths and four focus distances, for a total of 16 MFA points. The added functionality that you get from the Sigma C is definitely worth the small price difference. If you have other lenses from the new Sigma Global Vision Range then you can use the same dock with all of those lenses too.

The much more expensive 150-600 Sport brings a much better build quality, at the least equal to Canon big white L quality. It's fully weather sealed, and is built on a solid aluminium lens barrel, it's one big chunk of metal, they have a bare body on display in WEX in Norwich, it's quite impressive. The optical arrangement for the Sport is different too, and the image quality is said to be even better. I haven't actually tried out the Sport, as it was never in my price range. Of the five reasonably priced big zooms on the market today, if you include the original 100-400L, I have used three of them, the other two I can only judge by the comments of others. When it comes to image quality I would say that from best to worse they run as follows:


  1. Canon 100-400 V2

  2. Sigma 150-600 S

  3. Sigma 150-600 C

  4. Canon 100-400 V1

  5. Tamron 150-600.


Example from Tamron 150-600, one of the few decent shots I got, as when coming towards you there is not much panning movement.

IMAGE: https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3855/14861779649_50df2fb3c0_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oDhv​ja  (external link) North American P51D Mustang (external link) by Alan Evans (external link), on Flickr

Example from Canon 100-400 V1

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1716/25801370622_28631c81a5_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/FiYL​zC  (external link) North American P51D Mustang (external link) by Alan Evans (external link), on Flickr

Sample from Sigma 150-600 C

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1604/25395252873_aa3f03cfa7_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/EG6i​Vt  (external link) Hawker Hurricane Mk I (external link) by Alan Evans (external link), on Flickr

I tried to pick reasonably similar shots from each air show.

Alan

alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
guntoter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,411 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 77
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Knoxville, Tn
     
May 04, 2016 19:16 |  #4

Thanks for the replies guys. Wow the Sigma sport seems nice from your statements. I know the canon 100-400 II is great, but for a FF camera the 600mm is better for reach. I have the 400mm f5.6 for my 7D II, but use the Tammy 150-600 on the 5D III. Actually the Tammy has done a good job for me in most cases. Examples below:

This was taken at a very great distance over a river (probably 150 yards)

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1696/25832166543_582085e830_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/FmGB​8M  (external link) Seven Islands-0658 (external link) by R. Joel Ownby Jr. (external link), on Flickr

This one was taken at about 75 yards hand held of a hawk in flight

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7374/26822477435_27126506d5_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/GSdd​4v  (external link) Hawk-7039 (external link) by R. Joel Ownby Jr. (external link), on Flickr

Joel
GEAR
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,120 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
May 05, 2016 02:51 |  #5

I think if you already have the Tamron, and can limit yourself to 1/FL or better shutter speeds for moving subjects, so you don't need to worry about how effective the VC is going to be, I wouldn't consider upgrading to the Sigma C. When It comes to buying one of these lenses new though, you would really need to be strapped for cash to consider the Tamron over the Sigma when the prices are so close. I just looked at my usual dealers price for the two lenses, while writing this, and they are both currently £739. At the same price I don't know how you would possibly buy the Tamron. They have both come down a lot in the last six months too, as my Sigma C was £899 last October and the Tamron was £100 cheaper. Saying that the RRP for the lenses are significantly different. The Tamron's is now £880, while the Sigma is still listed with the launch RRP of £1199.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
May 05, 2016 06:02 |  #6

Considering the prices are close, the sigma offers much more af accuracy and speed customization via the dock, and the latest firmware update improves AF speed by around 30-40%. You have to butbuy a $50 dock, but that makes for a better overall product choice in my opinion. As sigma updates the firmware too, you can update the lens. None of this is available with the tamron.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
guntoter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,411 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 77
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Knoxville, Tn
     
May 05, 2016 08:58 |  #7

BigAl007, no I am not upgrading. The OP was to inquire for a friend who is looking to buy, and I am going to recommend the Sigma to her.


Joel
GEAR
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
May 05, 2016 09:01 |  #8

$990 at B&H with bonus Sigma dock and uv filter

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …_600mm_f_5_6_3_​dg_os.html (external link)


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,808 views & 2 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Tamron vs Sigma 150-600mm
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1052 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.