Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 15 May 2016 (Sunday) 10:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which output size to display images on TV

 
khwaja
Goldmember
1,005 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 154
Joined Aug 2012
     
May 15, 2016 10:51 |  #1

Hi,
Which output size is good to choose during batch processing to display images on TV. I am thinking of choosing 1080 for short side and let DPP decide other size. Or is it better to leave them in full size, let TV downscale them.

Thanks,


Canon RP with 24-240mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,447 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4538
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 15, 2016 12:17 |  #2

1080p TV supports 1920x1080, so why send it any more pixels than it can display?..more pixels = extra loading time, and to no purpose.

OTOH, your dSLR aspect ratio is typicall 1.5:1, unless you shoot 4:3 format. So if you crated 1920 pixels across, then your output file is 1280 pixels tall...wasted pixels sent to the TV

So, with 1080 pixels vertically, your output file needs to be 1620 pixels wide to preserve the 1.5:1 aspect ratio, and you have 15% unused screen size horiontally.

But the way your TV handles files determines what your optimum will be. On my TV, it aways 'fits vertical fully' no matter what vertical pixel count. I see the same image on the screen whether I send original file (3888x2592) or 1920 horizontal TV width file (1920x1280) or vertical screen width file (1620x1080), so I might as well send 1620x1080 because it is only 20% of the storage space and is only 1/5 the time to send the file to the TV via wireless


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
khwaja
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,005 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 154
Joined Aug 2012
     
May 15, 2016 12:41 |  #3

Wilt wrote in post #18007790 (external link)
1080p TV supports 1920x1080, so why send it any more pixels than it can display?..more pixels = extra loading time, and to no purpose.

OTOH, your dSLR aspect ratio is typicall 1.5:1, unless you shoot 4:3 format. So if you crated 1920 pixels across, then your output file is 1280 pixels tall...wasted pixels sent to the TV

So, with 1080 pixels vertically, your output file needs to be 1620 pixels wide to preserve the 1.5:1 aspect ratio, and you have 15% unused screen size horiontally.

But the way your TV handles files determines what your optimum will be. On my TV, it aways 'fits vertical fully' no matter what vertical pixel count. I see the same image on the screen whether I send original file (3888x2592) or 1920 horizontal TV width file (1920x1280) or vertical screen width file (1620x1080), so I might as well send 1620x1080 because it is only 20% of the storage space and is only 1/5 the time to send the file to the TV via wireless

Thanks for the information. I tested out by displaying pics with full resolution. It is displaying with black bars to the left and right sides. I can convert files with 1620 X 1080 in DPP itself. I can also tone down noise settings. I should see more than stop improvement in iso by converting into 1620 X 1080.
Also noticed that, TV images are saturated. There is no need to add little saturation to image in DPP. Is there any reference screen brightness I need to use while working with DPP on my laptop.

Thanks


Canon RP with 24-240mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,454 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
Which output size to display images on TV
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1238 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.