My beloved 1D MkIII still can get over 7000 photos on a single charge, but that's shooting JPG. Will shooting raw change that much?
drisley "What a Tool I am" 9,002 posts Likes: 108 Joined Nov 2002 More info | May 23, 2016 14:35 | #1 My beloved 1D MkIII still can get over 7000 photos on a single charge, but that's shooting JPG. Will shooting raw change that much? EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bildeb0rg Goldmember More info | May 24, 2016 04:21 | #2 Cant see how it could make a difference but have to admit I "only" get about 3-3500 shooting RAW. Are you on original batteries or new/indy ones?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bassat "I am still in my underwear." 8,075 posts Likes: 2742 Joined Oct 2015 More info | May 24, 2016 04:58 | #3 Permanent banCan't see that it will make any difference at all. All images are created as raw data. All images also get processed as JPG for rear LCD display. The only difference is what gets written to the card(s).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
urbanfreestyle I am a squirrel who loves rubbing bottles and I have Nuts in my drawers, too! More info | I got on average about 3500 RAW, didn't try jpeg Facebook
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 25, 2016 17:23 | #5 Well, more data being written for the Raw (ie I can get 4x more jpgs on a card vs raw) EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Still using the 8 year old original Canon battery! EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bildeb0rg Goldmember More info | May 27, 2016 02:18 | #7 Am I wrong in thinking the camera produces jpegs from a RAW file in camera then?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed. (3 edits in all) | The camera will always create a raw and JPG internally, the setting only controls what it actually writes out to card. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,733 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | May 27, 2016 10:28 | #9 I would think that the processing of the image is pretty much the same no matter what settings at least for a power standpoint. However, a raw file is significantly larger so write times are going to be longer, but I have to believe that the power needed to write to the card can't be that much. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bassat "I am still in my underwear." 8,075 posts Likes: 2742 Joined Oct 2015 More info | May 27, 2016 11:36 | #10 Permanent bangjl711 wrote in post #18020759 I would think that the processing of the image is pretty much the same no matter what settings at least for a power standpoint. However, a raw file is significantly larger so write times are going to be longer, but I have to believe that the power needed to write to the card can't be that much. I agree. Chimping for 1 minute, or using IS/OS/VC for 1 minute likely uses a lot more power than writing a several thousand images. Raw, JPG, or Raw+JPG can't possibly make a significant difference in battery life.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon_Doh Senior Member More info | May 28, 2016 09:11 | #11 I shoot only RAW so I can't compare how well my battery lasts vs JPEGs, but I can say shooting RAW I get fantastic battery life. I use a Kodak Brownie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt. (2 edits in all) | May 28, 2016 23:48 | #12 Am I the only one who wonders how often you SHOOT 7000 photos in a single photo session (even a 12 hour coverage of a wedding!) to need to worry about battery life?! You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,733 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | May 29, 2016 00:34 | #13 Wilt wrote in post #18022339 Am I the only one who wonders how often you SHOOT 7000 photos in a single photo session (even a 12 hour coverage of a wedding!) to need to worry about battery life?! That is consuming 1/21 the shutter life of the average camera, in a single shooting session And while a 1D has longer expected shutter life, 7000 is still about 1/42 of the expected life!7000 images for a 12 hour session is one image every 6 seconds. That's not a lot of time to compose an image. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt. (4 edits in all) | May 29, 2016 00:39 | #14 gjl711 wrote in post #18022365 7000 images for a 12 hour session is one image every 6 seconds. That's not a lot of time to compose an image. There is a thread, still active, in which the statement was made, "I take around 8000-9000 photos per wedding." I used to be blown away at the idea of 25000 shots in a year, but no more. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 02, 2016 01:32 | #15 Wilt wrote in post #18022339 Am I the only one who wonders how often you SHOOT 7000 photos in a single photo session (even a 12 hour coverage of a wedding!) to need to worry about battery life?! That is consuming 1/21 the shutter life of the average camera, in a single shooting session And while a 1D has longer expected shutter life, 7000 is still about 1/42 of the expected life!Tell me about it... actually I shot 10,000 photos on Saturday from 9am to 10pm. Bodybuilding shows generally have 200 competitors and I shoot almost nonstop (well there is a 3 hr break at 1pm to 4pm) so yeah, NO TIME TO COMPOSE A SHOT! I do well though as I've been at this for 10 years, and I rarely get any closed eyes or out of focus shots (yay for the 1D MkIII). EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1459 guests, 136 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||