OhLook wrote in post #18026378
It's useful for me. When someone comments about an image, for example, without saying whose image he or she is talking about, I don't know what to make of it.
Quote serves the same purpose, but better and consistent. Reply simply isnt needed since it's inconsistent, which causes confusion. I'm no software developer, actually, I am
, and I dont know about all concepts, but generally, having two separate functions reach the same conclusion doesnt sit well with me. I'm not the only one that's expressed said conclusion, browse this forum using your phone, it gets bad, and for that I tend to browse this mostly on desktop.
The post number does nothing for me, it's way too long to remember, and what's the point really? A return arrow link should suffice. It's like displaying a primary key in a database, the end user doesnt need to know about it.
Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140