Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
Thread started 01 Jun 2016 (Wednesday) 15:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

70d user with 5d mkii opportunity...

 
sa_20v
Member
47 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2008
Location: London
     
Jun 01, 2016 15:38 |  #1

Hi guys, I've recently been tasked with selling my deceased Uncle's camera equipment and amongst the junk and old Nikon bodies found a boxed 5d mkii with 24-105mm kit lens (reasonable shutter count). For sentimental reasons I'm tempted to buy the 5d mkii myself and use it as an opportunity to move to full frame.

I bought the 70d a while ago and have enjoyed it. The main reason for purchase was video (chasing my children around) but it has largely been used for pictures (planes, cars and cityscapes). I realise the focus points on the mkii aren't as strong but would like to hear what you would do in my position?

Lenses I own:

EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS (the first one)
EF-S 10-22mm f3.5-4.5 USM Lens
EF 50mm f1.4 USM Lens - possibly my favourite alongside the 70-200
EF-S 28mm f2.8 pancake
EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS
EF 100-400mm (the first one)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,729 posts
Likes: 4064
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jun 01, 2016 16:01 |  #2

As a 7D/5DII owner I strongly recommend picking up the 5DII. The two cameras shine in different areas and complement one another perfectly. If you can get a decent price, go for it.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ksbal
Goldmember
Avatar
2,745 posts
Gallery: 374 photos
Best ofs: 9
Likes: 2433
Joined Sep 2010
Location: N.E. Kansas
     
Jun 01, 2016 16:20 |  #3

If you can pick it up for less than a 6D with 24-105 I'd say go for it.


Godox/Flashpoint r2 system, plus some canon stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Jun 01, 2016 16:57 |  #4

All around just do it, I'd say.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sa_20v
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
47 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2008
Location: London
     
Jun 01, 2016 17:13 |  #5

Thanks guys, if I were to keep just one camera would your view change?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,729 posts
Likes: 4064
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jun 01, 2016 17:31 |  #6

sa_20v wrote in post #18026249 (external link)
Thanks guys, if I were to keep just one camera would your view change?

Depends on what you want to shoot. The standard answer crop=anything that moves and FF=landscapes, portraits, things stationary applies.

If I had to keep only one of my cameras, I would keep the 5DII as my favorite subjects tend to be still or move slowly. I rarely do action stuff.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sa_20v
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
47 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2008
Location: London
     
Jun 02, 2016 04:52 |  #7

gjl711 wrote in post #18026262 (external link)
Depends on what you want to shoot. The standard answer crop=anything that moves and FF=landscapes, portraits, things stationary applies.

If I had to keep only one of my cameras, I would keep the 5DII as my favorite subjects tend to be still or move slowly. I rarely do action stuff.

Agreed, I think the only thing I'm worried about is the lack of focus points but perhaps I've watched too many mkiii vs mkii videos!

If I sell the 70d and EF-S lenses I should be able to cover the cost. I'll miss the 10-22mm but suspect there's a nice EF wide-angle I can buy instead (17-40?).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited over 7 years ago by MalVeauX.
     
Jun 02, 2016 05:04 |  #8

Heya,

Well, I for one, and this is just my experience, don't really care about having tons of focus points. I've done birding with the same old AF system on my 5D (note the 5Dc & 5D2 have the same AF system), and my 7D and 1D series, totally different beasts. But, I don't use anything other than the center point for virtually anything, I'm just used to it. Having a bunch of different AF points hasn't really made a difference for what I do, so using an old antequated 5D AF system or an advanced 1D system doesn't change things for me. So I still enjoy using my 5D. I like the sensor size relationship with focal lengths more than on APS-C for almost everything. And I just like the files more.

If you're hardcore into video, then keep the 70D.

But if you're not, then the 5D2 is what you want to keep. And then just slowly swap glass out.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ksbal
Goldmember
Avatar
2,745 posts
Gallery: 374 photos
Best ofs: 9
Likes: 2433
Joined Sep 2010
Location: N.E. Kansas
Post edited over 7 years ago by ksbal.
     
Jun 02, 2016 07:26 as a reply to  @ sa_20v's post |  #9

Ok, only one camera between the two? then I'd keep the 70D - but I do more than center point focus. If you live off of center point, then go for the 5D2.

No, you haven't watched to many videos. the 5D2 will lock and beep on an outer point, but there is a percentage of those that are NOT in focus when you get back to the computer. Bright sunlight - ok, anything else, and it is a crap shoot.


Godox/Flashpoint r2 system, plus some canon stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sa_20v
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
47 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2008
Location: London
     
Jun 09, 2016 08:40 |  #10

Thanks for all the advice. I've spent the last few days running them back to back and cannot decide between them...yet. I'll post back here when I've made a decision with my reasons for it (it could be a coin toss though as both have their merits!).

Or should I just get a 5d mkiii (and be berated by the girlfriend)! ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jun 09, 2016 11:50 |  #11

5Dii > 70D. It's really nice to shoot 50mm and having it behave like 50mm.

I'm surprised your uncle's family would be selling it? I'm giving my stuff away to family should I ever pass..... what type of price are you looking at?


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Jun 09, 2016 11:55 |  #12

I guess I don't know what that means to say "a lens acts like it supposed to". I don't really have a mental view of what XXmm should look like, I just make sure I have all focal lengths available and shoot at whatever framing I need with whatever format I shoot with. Having somebody tell me that "the 135mm shoots like a 135mm on a FF" isn't very helpful as I consider formats.

If the option exists to get the 5D3, I would definitely take the 5D3 over the 5D2 or 70D.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jun 09, 2016 12:14 |  #13

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18034147 (external link)
I guess I don't know what that means to say "a lens acts like it supposed to". I don't really have a mental view of what XXmm should look like, I just make sure I have all focal lengths available and shoot at whatever framing I need with whatever format I shoot with. Having somebody tell me that "the 135mm shoots like a 135mm on a FF" isn't very helpful as I consider formats.

If the option exists to get the 5D3, I would definitely take the 5D3 over the 5D2 or 70D.

The marketing for the EF 50mm F1.4 is a "Standard" lens. It's certainly NOT a "standard" lens when mated with the 70D.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed. (4 edits in all)
     
Jun 09, 2016 12:42 as a reply to  @ Charlie's post |  #14

What does "standard" mean exactly? I deal with 4-5 Canon shooters right now, I can tell you that if I said either "the 50mm is a standard lens", or I said "if you use the 50mm on a FF, you are going to get a true 50mm view", they wouldn't understand either comment.

It only makes sense to those that have experience shooting both formats, and even then, that is questionable in many cases.

Finally there is no real focal length for a "standard" (ie. you get roughly what you see with just your eyes), because there is no set focal length that people "see" with. You could probably label "40mm to 60mm" as standard, depending on who you use as a test case.

In this case of the OP, the person will only be able to use 3 of the lenses they own with the 5D2 (or 5D3), along with the newly acquired 25-105. Yes, shooting the 50mm on the FF will now yield a frame that is wider than what was experienced with the 70D.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,729 posts
Likes: 4064
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jun 09, 2016 12:55 |  #15

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18034147 (external link)
I guess I don't know what that means to say "a lens acts like it supposed to". I don't really have a mental view of what XXmm should look like, I just make sure I have all focal lengths available and shoot at whatever framing I need with whatever format I shoot with. Having somebody tell me that "the 135mm shoots like a 135mm on a FF" isn't very helpful as I consider formats.

If the option exists to get the 5D3, I would definitely take the 5D3 over the 5D2 or 70D.

Spoken as someone who has used many different formats. :) I too think the whole mm thing is a non-issue but that's because I have shot very small and very large formats and have always used the VF as my guide.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,132 views & 1 like for this thread, 8 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
70d user with 5d mkii opportunity...
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1291 guests, 174 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.