THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
zeus77 Senior Member More info | Jun 02, 2016 08:03 | #1 Image hosted by forum (796565) © zeus77 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (796566) © zeus77 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 02, 2016 08:04 | #2 Image hosted by forum (796567) © zeus77 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (796568) © zeus77 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 02, 2016 08:06 | #3 Image hosted by forum (796569) © zeus77 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (796570) © zeus77 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 02, 2016 08:08 | #4 Image hosted by forum (796571) © zeus77 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrickR Cream of the Crop 5,935 posts Likes: 115 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Dallas TX More info | Jun 03, 2016 16:26 | #5 These are good! #1 is the only one where the grain is a bit too much for my taste. Other than that, really like this set, especially #4. My junk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
98kellrs Senior Member More info | Jun 03, 2016 20:33 | #6 Your style and creativity just blows me away, I'd never be able to pull off this kind of edit, well done! Ryan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2016 06:33 | #7 Great compositions! I agree the grain is a bit too much but that's just my tastes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Amadauss Senior Member More info Post edited over 7 years ago by Amadauss. | Jun 08, 2016 09:54 | #8 Another great set! Your posing and composition is very very good. The only one I might have changed is the shot with the top of his head showing. I just feel guy's do not want to see how bald they are going. In that one, crop would ruin it so in some cases I might fill it in just a bit. We all think we have a bunch of hair up there anyway even if we don't. 2-R-6, 1-5D Mark 4, 3-5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, 2-7D's, 70D, canon 70-200 2.8 L IS II, 24-70L II, 85 1.8, 85 1.2, 50mm, 135 mm F2 L, 17-40 , 24-105, Sigma 35 Art and 18-35 1.8, 600 EX's, Elinchrom RX and Phottix 500 strobes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 08, 2016 10:39 | #9 love them but like others the grain is a bit too distracting for me. ~Steve~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 08, 2016 18:50 | #10 I like the shots but I agree with a little too much grain. David
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saea501 ... spilled over a little on the panties More info | Jun 09, 2016 07:11 | #11 I guess I just don't understand why one would buy equipment that has the least amount of inherent grain and try to use it in such a way as to eliminate or reduce the grain and then turn around and add a big dose of it in post. Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 09, 2016 08:13 | #12 saea501 wrote in post #18033887 I guess I just don't understand why one would buy equipment that has the least amount of inherent grain and try to use it in such a way as to eliminate or reduce the grain and then turn around and add a big dose of it in post. Good point, and our style of striving to avoid grain, I agree on why add a big dose in post. I guess each has their own style and if their client likes it, that is all that matters. The photos remind me of old photos in magazines like Life magazine (showing my age here) or similar that had that very grainy look but had a very unique quality in the composition and style that pulled it off and made them very interesting. 2-R-6, 1-5D Mark 4, 3-5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, 2-7D's, 70D, canon 70-200 2.8 L IS II, 24-70L II, 85 1.8, 85 1.2, 50mm, 135 mm F2 L, 17-40 , 24-105, Sigma 35 Art and 18-35 1.8, 600 EX's, Elinchrom RX and Phottix 500 strobes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
memoriesoftomorrow Goldmember 3,846 posts Likes: 293 Joined Nov 2010 More info Post edited over 7 years ago by memoriesoftomorrow. | Jun 09, 2016 08:26 | #13 Way too heavy on the grain for me. The artefacts it has created aren't appealing imho. Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 09, 2016 13:16 | #14 Thank you all for commens, I and my colleague will do 60 weddings in 2016. and all photos have grain....some more some less and our clients love it..and this is our style. I love that I can do style that I am like so that is win win for me
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 09, 2016 13:19 | #15 saea501 wrote in post #18033887 I guess I just don't understand why one would buy equipment that has the least amount of inherent grain and try to use it in such a way as to eliminate or reduce the grain and then turn around and add a big dose of it in post. I look lens like something with character...like 200 f2 is not only so so sharp it has some different character from anything else I have in my bag
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1514 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||