Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 13 Jun 2016 (Monday) 23:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How much is too much?

 
huntersdad
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Jun 13, 2016 23:28 |  #1

I shot a wedding this weekend in the mountains. About 2 days after I booked them, my gut was telling me bad idea. There images for the most part are really strong despite neither wanting to be in pictures, but...

The location had what I can only speculate as a gnat infestation. I don't remember ever being in a location with swarms of gnats as thick as they had. First look pictures were limited to a dozen or so, but their formal couple pictures literally have 100 or more of these little dust looking spots. I'm pretty sure that she is going to probably not review me very well, so in an effort to not give her any additional ammo, I thought "Hey, I'll head a problem off by removing all these little bugs!". That's a terrible idea.

Any other thoughts on a more efficient way of getting rid of them? the gnats, that is.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Jun 13, 2016 23:40 |  #2

Here's an example

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/06/2/LQ_798524.jpg
Image hosted by forum (798524) © huntersdad [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
memoriesoftomorrow
Goldmember
3,846 posts
Likes: 293
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jun 14, 2016 01:22 as a reply to  @ huntersdad's post |  #3

Outsource and get them all removed.


Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryanforster
Hatchling
Avatar
7 posts
Joined Jun 2016
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Jun 14, 2016 07:31 |  #4

I wouldn't think she'd expect you to remove them all. As if they were never there at all. She can't possibly be upset with her photos because of something out of your control


Ryan Forster (external link)
Sony user.. haters gonna hate.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jun 14, 2016 08:43 |  #5

Extended retouching of this nature is extremely time-consuming and outside of the scope of your wedding package. Offer to do full cleanup and retouching in a small number of files - probably the ones from which she's going to buy big prints.

The rest, you'll be happy to do extended retouching to eliminate the bugs at your hourly rate, or you can deliver them with just your standard editing and retouching.


(side note, the dust-and-scratches filter on a separate layer, and a very roughly applied layer mask to make it only affect the sky, MIGHT make short work of the bugs)


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 14, 2016 15:28 |  #6

I clearly state on my prices page what is included in my editing, because it's come up before. In this case I would email and point out that insects and ask if she'd like them removed in some or all images, and that it would be outsourced at $x per image. retouchup.com could do this relatively cheaply.

Sometimes you have to accept that bad reviews say more about the reviewer than the service. I reply to all reviews positively. If I read reviews and someone is clearly moaning, if the product/service either accepts responsibility or makes some reasonable reply I ignore the bad feedback... unless there's a lot of it.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littlejon ­ Dsgn
Goldmember
3,266 posts
Likes: 905
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Sandy, Oregon
     
Jun 14, 2016 20:18 |  #7

Are you expecting the bad review because of the bugs, or are there other things that will be leading to that review. As for the bugs, I would not be editing those out unless compensated to do so. Bugs is no different then a gray sky, or dead grass at the venue ..... not something I can control.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M_Six
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,845 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Dec 2010
Location: East Central IL
     
Jun 14, 2016 20:41 |  #8

From a processing standpoint the gnats in the pic you posted are pretty easy to take out since the background is blurred anyway. Just duped the image and apply a dust and scratches filter set to 2 pixels and 0 thresholds. Load a reverse mask (ALT - Mask) and using a white brush just paint over the gnats in big swaths, then reduce brush size and get into the tighter areas. Again, because the gnats are against an already blurred background, they just disappear.

Now whether you should do that or want to with the rest of the pics is another story. I don't shoot professionally, so I'm in no position to comment on that.


Mark J.
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Jun 14, 2016 21:34 |  #9

Littlejon Dsgn wrote in post #18039617 (external link)
Are you expecting the bad review because of the bugs, or are there other things that will be leading to that review. As for the bugs, I would not be editing those out unless compensated to do so. Bugs is no different then a gray sky, or dead grass at the venue ..... not something I can control.

The gnats aren't the issue. The wedding style was the overall issue. She hired me based on my portfolio, then started asking for some things that don't fit my style - shooting wide to capture the environment, different processing, so on. Day of, she was 1.5 hours late getting ready which cut our portrait time to 45 minutes. The couple wanted images up the mountain, which really limited us, so there's some shots she wanted that we didn't get. We did formals (she wanted candid formals, which I still don't understand) and then they were done with pictures. I mentioned some of the shots we didn't get and she didn't care. Overall, it was THAT wedding and THAT bride.

I posted their first look today on FB and got a text from her about 2 hours later saying she didn't remember agreeing to this and that any further online posting would have to vetted by her. I pointed her to her quote and contract where it specifies that.

Just going to be a headache.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littlejon ­ Dsgn
Goldmember
3,266 posts
Likes: 905
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Sandy, Oregon
     
Jun 14, 2016 21:41 |  #10

huntersdad wrote in post #18039688 (external link)
The gnats aren't the issue. The wedding style was the overall issue. She hired me based on my portfolio, then started asking for some things that don't fit my style - shooting wide to capture the environment, different processing, so on. Day of, she was 1.5 hours late getting ready which cut our portrait time to 45 minutes. The couple wanted images up the mountain, which really limited us, so there's some shots she wanted that we didn't get. We did formals (she wanted candid formals, which I still don't understand) and then they were done with pictures. I mentioned some of the shots we didn't get and she didn't care. Overall, it was THAT wedding and THAT bride.

I posted their first look today on FB and got a text from her about 2 hours later saying she didn't remember agreeing to this and that any further online posting would have to vetted by her. I pointed her to her quote and contract where it specifies that.

Just going to be a headache.

Sorry about that, sounds like like a bad day all around. I would maybe do 1 image so she can see what can be done and let her know each additional image is $X and leave it at that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 14, 2016 21:41 |  #11

Some people are just more trouble. I've found it's just best to roll with it. I don't share photos online if they request I don't, and I take them down if they ask, because I was the same for my own wedding. I also help customers plan their wedding day, making sure they know how long things take and have contingency.

If they don't go with my recommendations I warn them in advance they're compromising their photos, but I'll do my best regardless. I did this recently with a bride who had a late afternoon winter wedding, not much time for photos. They also had a videographer and I warned them that it limits things. Surely enough the photos weren't as good as they would be, but they were still happy.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Jun 14, 2016 23:02 |  #12

Littlejon Dsgn wrote in post #18039696 (external link)
Sorry about that, sounds like like a bad day all around. I would maybe do 1 image so she can see what can be done and let her know each additional image is $X and leave it at that.

Yea, it was. It was that wedding you book and 24 hours later you're wondering why the hell you did that.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Jun 14, 2016 23:06 |  #13

tim wrote in post #18039697 (external link)
Some people are just more trouble. I've found it's just best to roll with it. I don't share photos online if they request I don't, and I take them down if they ask, because I was the same for my own wedding. I also help customers plan their wedding day, making sure they know how long things take and have contingency.

If they don't go with my recommendations I warn them in advance they're compromising their photos, but I'll do my best regardless. I did this recently with a bride who had a late afternoon winter wedding, not much time for photos. They also had a videographer and I warned them that it limits things. Surely enough the photos weren't as good as they would be, but they were still happy.

Thanks Tim. The overall set is really good, but I really fell like she's only going to see what's missing or what's wrong.

I do offer to not put anything online. In fact, my clients last night made the request to not do anything online and I'll oblige. She NEVER said anything about it. She planned her wedding and we discussed it. I even brought up that fact that if she ran late, we would be crunched. She swore she wouldn't, which immediately told me to go to back ideas. I came up with a couple, offered them as suggestions, she wanted it her way, so we did.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 14, 2016 23:55 |  #14

All you can do is suggest.

I had a customer recently who didn't ask for photos not to go online, as far as I can recall, but text'd me immediately when they went up. I took them down, of course. One of my more difficult customers, relatively critical when they saw some samples, but I worked through everything with them and they seem ok now.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,678 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
How much is too much?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1753 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.