Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 14 Jun 2016 (Tuesday) 01:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Anyone use an intravolometer for fireworks?

 
Rstanford
Member
201 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2009
     
Jun 14, 2016 01:17 |  #1

I normally set my camera to manual mode and set my aperture to f9 and use my Shutter release to time my shutter.

Does anyone use an intravolometer set to continuous? Say 6 sec shutter speeds and just let it run through the show?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jabtas
Goldmember
Avatar
3,058 posts
Gallery: 194 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 2407
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Teesside UK
Post edited over 7 years ago by jabtas.
     
Jun 14, 2016 01:55 |  #2

Don't even need an intervelometer, a cable release with a locking switch and drive mode will do the job nicely

In fact no need for a locking switch, just hold it yourself and let the camera shoot in drive, that way you can let go during pauses in the show


Tim
Some Canon stuff, some Sigma stuff and yet more Canon stuff
My Gallery - http://www.pbase.com/j​abtas (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jun 14, 2016 03:45 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

I use f/11, ISO 100, and BULB. And a wired shutter release. My open shutter varies from about 5 seconds to almost 20 seconds. It seems to work really well. Don't forget the tripod. I can't see that an intervalometer would be of any use. Here is one at 17s.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/06/2/LQ_798536.jpg
Image hosted by forum (798536) © Bassat [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,076 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 12358
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Post edited over 7 years ago by mystik610. (2 edits in all)
     
Jun 14, 2016 08:13 |  #4

How long you hold the shutter open will vary depending on how long the firework bursts are...You also need to time the opening of the shutter with the initial burst of the fireworks....so you'd want to use a shutter release cable...not a intervalometer.


focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀIV - α7ʀIII
Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sigma 35 f1.2 ART - Sony 35 1.8 - Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8 - Sony 85GM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
archfotos
Member
119 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2016
     
Jun 14, 2016 09:12 |  #5

I've done two time-lapses of fireworks with an intervalometer. For single still image the intervalometer, even over time can't by happenstance capture the "moment". My own timing is better even if I miss some moments. Not going to say that a time-lapse couldn't be cool but remember it can look funky (or bad) because the nature of the time-lapse stutters time and misses some of the needed downtime with rocket launches, etc..

I think I might be more inclined to try and speed up video of the show depending upon what you want to do.


DC Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abacus022
Goldmember
Avatar
1,916 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Likes: 1471
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Seattle
     
Jun 14, 2016 13:19 |  #6

I have used it when I had two cameras setup on tripods. I let one, with the intravolometer on it, just do its thing, while I took control of the 2nd as described above.


Canon EOS R5, R, 7D mkII, 6D
Lenses: Canon RF 100-500, Canon 100-400 II, Tamron 28-300, Tamron 18-270, Sigma 150-500, Canon 50, Sigma 28, Canon RF 2X TC
www.photographyByAbacu​s.com (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/abacus22 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jun 14, 2016 13:21 |  #7

abacus022 wrote in post #18039233 (external link)
I have used it when I had two cameras setup on tripods. I let one, with the intravolometer on it, just do its thing, while I took control of the 2nd as described above.


How were the results?


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Post edited over 7 years ago by DreDaze.
     
Jun 14, 2016 13:42 |  #8

i used my trigger trap last time...set it to take a photo i think every 11 seconds or so...then was adjusting my settings between 8-10 seconds depending on how many fireworks were going off...towards the end when they go nuts i'd have to drop the shutter time otherwise it would just be over-exposed...took a bunch of shots, some better than others obviously, but i doubt trying to time it would be any better...and i got to just sit back and watch the show

IMAGE: https://c3.staticflickr.com/2/1595/24255493274_2fe3a5b90d_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/CXnK​6U  (external link)

IMAGE: https://c4.staticflickr.com/2/1472/24883890155_08834694b0_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/DUUr​AT  (external link)

IMAGE: https://c5.staticflickr.com/2/1478/24255795284_498c14d616_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/CXph​SY  (external link)

Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rstanford
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
201 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2009
Post edited over 7 years ago by Rstanford. (2 edits in all)
     
Jun 14, 2016 17:31 |  #9

I'm going to set up multiple cameras, and I would like to automate the process. And I was thinking about using an intravolometer set to continuous shooting maybe 8-12 second shutter times.

And I would keep one camera fully manual.

I was also thinking about setting 1 camera to f9 and control the shutter manually and set the other to maybe 20-30 second shutter time with the smallest aperture available.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jun 15, 2016 08:09 |  #10

With the multiple exposure option now on the latest cameras, has anyone tried to do an in-camera composite of multiple firework bursts?


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,076 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 12358
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
     
Jun 15, 2016 08:45 |  #11

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18040029 (external link)
With the multiple exposure option now on the latest cameras, has anyone tried to do an in-camera composite of multiple firework bursts?

Maybe I'm not good enough in post, but I since the scene in these shots are basically exposed by the firework bursts, I found it hard to balance the exposure between different shots.

Curious to know if aynone has a method of doing this.


focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀIV - α7ʀIII
Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sigma 35 f1.2 ART - Sony 35 1.8 - Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8 - Sony 85GM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abacus022
Goldmember
Avatar
1,916 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Likes: 1471
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Seattle
     
Jun 15, 2016 15:47 |  #12

nathancarter wrote in post #18039239 (external link)
How were the results?

I ended up combining the two different versions, syncing the time. It was interesting. I did like the way they all came out, though the one with the intravolometer had more dead shots, since I wasn't directly controlling it. Times when nothing was shooting off at that exact moment.

I would do that again if I was able. If I only had one camera, I think I would do the bulb manual timing and shooting.


Canon EOS R5, R, 7D mkII, 6D
Lenses: Canon RF 100-500, Canon 100-400 II, Tamron 28-300, Tamron 18-270, Sigma 150-500, Canon 50, Sigma 28, Canon RF 2X TC
www.photographyByAbacu​s.com (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/abacus22 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abacus022
Goldmember
Avatar
1,916 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Likes: 1471
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Seattle
     
Jun 15, 2016 15:50 |  #13

mystik610 wrote in post #18040066 (external link)
Maybe I'm not good enough in post, but I since the scene in these shots are basically exposed by the firework bursts, I found it hard to balance the exposure between different shots.

Curious to know if aynone has a method of doing this.

I kept all shots and both cameras one single exposure setting. This meant that some of the longer bulb exposures were a little over exposed, but not so much I couldn't recover the highlights.

I would have to check what those settings were, but I am thinking something like F9 and ISO200, or similar. Don't quote me on that.


Canon EOS R5, R, 7D mkII, 6D
Lenses: Canon RF 100-500, Canon 100-400 II, Tamron 28-300, Tamron 18-270, Sigma 150-500, Canon 50, Sigma 28, Canon RF 2X TC
www.photographyByAbacu​s.com (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/abacus22 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,309 views & 1 like for this thread, 9 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Anyone use an intravolometer for fireworks?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1519 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.