I normally set my camera to manual mode and set my aperture to f9 and use my Shutter release to time my shutter.
Does anyone use an intravolometer set to continuous? Say 6 sec shutter speeds and just let it run through the show?
Rstanford Member 201 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2009 More info | Jun 14, 2016 01:17 | #1 I normally set my camera to manual mode and set my aperture to f9 and use my Shutter release to time my shutter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jabtas Goldmember More info Post edited over 7 years ago by jabtas. | Jun 14, 2016 01:55 | #2 Don't even need an intervelometer, a cable release with a locking switch and drive mode will do the job nicely Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bassat "I am still in my underwear." 8,075 posts Likes: 2742 Joined Oct 2015 More info | Jun 14, 2016 03:45 | #3 Permanent banI use f/11, ISO 100, and BULB. And a wired shutter release. My open shutter varies from about 5 seconds to almost 20 seconds. It seems to work really well. Don't forget the tripod. I can't see that an intervalometer would be of any use. Here is one at 17s. Image hosted by forum (798536) © Bassat [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mystik610 Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 7 years ago by mystik610. (2 edits in all) | Jun 14, 2016 08:13 | #4 How long you hold the shutter open will vary depending on how long the firework bursts are...You also need to time the opening of the shutter with the initial burst of the fireworks....so you'd want to use a shutter release cable...not a intervalometer. focalpointsphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
archfotos Member 119 posts Likes: 37 Joined May 2016 More info | Jun 14, 2016 09:12 | #5 I've done two time-lapses of fireworks with an intervalometer. For single still image the intervalometer, even over time can't by happenstance capture the "moment". My own timing is better even if I miss some moments. Not going to say that a time-lapse couldn't be cool but remember it can look funky (or bad) because the nature of the time-lapse stutters time and misses some of the needed downtime with rocket launches, etc..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 14, 2016 13:19 | #6 I have used it when I had two cameras setup on tripods. I let one, with the intravolometer on it, just do its thing, while I took control of the 2nd as described above. Canon EOS R5, R, 7D mkII, 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 14, 2016 13:21 | #7 abacus022 wrote in post #18039233 I have used it when I had two cameras setup on tripods. I let one, with the intravolometer on it, just do its thing, while I took control of the 2nd as described above.
http://www.avidchick.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info Post edited over 7 years ago by DreDaze. | Jun 14, 2016 13:42 | #8 i used my trigger trap last time...set it to take a photo i think every 11 seconds or so...then was adjusting my settings between 8-10 seconds depending on how many fireworks were going off...towards the end when they go nuts i'd have to drop the shutter time otherwise it would just be over-exposed...took a bunch of shots, some better than others obviously, but i doubt trying to time it would be any better...and i got to just sit back and watch the show IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/CXnK6UAndre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rstanford THREAD STARTER Member 201 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2009 More info Post edited over 7 years ago by Rstanford. (2 edits in all) | Jun 14, 2016 17:31 | #9 I'm going to set up multiple cameras, and I would like to automate the process. And I was thinking about using an intravolometer set to continuous shooting maybe 8-12 second shutter times.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Jun 15, 2016 08:09 | #10 With the multiple exposure option now on the latest cameras, has anyone tried to do an in-camera composite of multiple firework bursts? Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mystik610 Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 15, 2016 08:45 | #11 TeamSpeed wrote in post #18040029 With the multiple exposure option now on the latest cameras, has anyone tried to do an in-camera composite of multiple firework bursts? Maybe I'm not good enough in post, but I since the scene in these shots are basically exposed by the firework bursts, I found it hard to balance the exposure between different shots. focalpointsphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 15, 2016 15:47 | #12 nathancarter wrote in post #18039239 How were the results? I ended up combining the two different versions, syncing the time. It was interesting. I did like the way they all came out, though the one with the intravolometer had more dead shots, since I wasn't directly controlling it. Times when nothing was shooting off at that exact moment. Canon EOS R5, R, 7D mkII, 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 15, 2016 15:50 | #13 mystik610 wrote in post #18040066 Maybe I'm not good enough in post, but I since the scene in these shots are basically exposed by the firework bursts, I found it hard to balance the exposure between different shots. Curious to know if aynone has a method of doing this. I kept all shots and both cameras one single exposure setting. This meant that some of the longer bulb exposures were a little over exposed, but not so much I couldn't recover the highlights. Canon EOS R5, R, 7D mkII, 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1519 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||