I shoot canon. May eventually change to mirorrless sony if these clowns dont offer some real tech advances soon but thats here nor there.
Starting out, I loved prime lenses and I still do.
I moved on to my current setup; 135mm f2 and a tamron 24-70.
the tamron is on the way out the door when I find a buyer for my idiotic low price I'm selling it for.
That aside, and the income I have from two weddings this weekend, I have some extra cash.
I'm torn between
35 and 50 primes
or a canon f2.8 II 24-70
I don't shoot weddings often so I don't mind renting the 24-70.
I do use the 24mm end a lot during my shoots but I feel like I could honestly go without it.
IF I go with primes I am then torn between Sigma art series and the new zeiss milvus lenses.
I love manual focusing and normally its not an issue at all.
I usually always do it.
AF is nice tho since I and gonna move into street photography and some moments just don't pause.
IF I went with Autofocusing primes, would it be worth getting the sigmas or spending some extra cash and getting the canon L series ( I LOVE L series gear and DONT mind spending a little extra, IF its truly worth it
I know this normally boils down to what I need and would use most but honestly I can make due with anything so.
I do love the funky effects and cool stuff you can do with bigger apertures.
One more benefit to getting ART series lenses is that I can spend some extra cash on other goodies. Studio stuff etc.
THANKKKKKKKKKKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS for your time 


