Almost many members or shooters who have this 70-200 f2.8LII are happy with it and said it is sharp, so are you doubting about its sharpness?
Buy it and you won't regret it
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer"  More info | Jul 02, 2016 04:53 | #16 Almost many members or shooters who have this 70-200 f2.8LII are happy with it and said it is sharp, so are you doubting about its sharpness? Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MMp Goldmember  More info Post edited over 7 years ago by MMp. | Jul 02, 2016 05:57 | #17 There are a few 100% crops in my for sale thread...https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1462949 With the impending forum closure, please consider joining the unofficial adjunct to the POTN forum, The POTN Forum Facebook Group
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jimmer411 Thank god Im green. 866 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Pacific, WA More info | Jul 03, 2016 14:37 | #18 Tareq wrote in post #18055729  Almost many members or shooters who have this 70-200 f2.8LII are happy with it and said it is sharp, so are you doubting about its sharpness? Buy it and you won't regret it
5D3 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 24-70 f/2.8L II | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 430EX | YN-568EX II | YN-622c | YN-622-TX |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Jul 03, 2016 15:22 | #19 Jimmer411 wrote in post #18056989 I own one and I love it, shots come out extremely sharp and I usually find myself toning down the sharpness in some situations. Yes, and i am happy with mine, no issue, and as you said, the sharpness is really great that i really don't need to add in pp, and it is great in all bodies i use it with. Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
battletone Senior Member  More info Post edited over 7 years ago by battletone. | Jul 07, 2016 08:04 | #20 Those images are heavily processed, and have a final output sharpening applied which I think is a bit heavily handed. But if we try to look past the post to what those images started as, then the 70-200 would give you that starting point no question. Every time I take a picture with the 70-200 I am blown away. It's just that good. It might be hyperbole, but the 70-200 IS II is one of the finest lenses ever made. Stuff will out spec it on paper, or maybe something medium format will out resolve it, but at $2000, show me a better lens please because I will buy it. Cameras: 5D Mark IV, EOS 3, Elan 7
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PeterAlex7 Member 159 posts Likes: 41 Joined Dec 2015 More info | Jul 08, 2016 23:40 | #21 Why they did heavy processing on their images? I don't understand why. Their cameras and lenses already good, produce images at its best.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Jul 09, 2016 00:51 | #22 PeterAlex7 wrote in post #18061771 Why they did heavy processing on their images? I don't understand why. Their cameras and lenses already good, produce images at its best. Just to show how sharper it is rather than just sharp, so you think that it is very sharp or razor sharp SOOC without any pp. Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 1339 guests, 121 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
