Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
Thread started 22 Jun 2016 (Wednesday) 11:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Am I upgrading from a 6D by buying a 5D MK III?

 
Jon_Chase
Member
Avatar
40 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 83
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Lexington, KY USA
     
Jun 22, 2016 11:31 |  #1

I've bought a 6D from Canon's refurb store as my only full frame camera a few months ago which I use for portraits primarily. I'm pleased with it, but I've been offered a new 5D MKIII for $1800 & am interested in your collective thoughts about replacing the 6D with the new 5d MKIII. Is there an advantage to using one over the other?


Jon
Jonathan Chase Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jun 22, 2016 11:35 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

I use a 6D. It does everything I need it to do EXCEPT AI-Servo tracking. The 5D3 would be a huge upgrade if you need to track moving objects. Otherwise, not so much. My action camera is a 1DIV. It is easier to configure the AF on the 1DIV than on the 5DIII, and the 1DIV is cheaper.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rittrato
Goldmember
Avatar
1,224 posts
Likes: 28
Joined May 2010
     
Jun 22, 2016 11:56 |  #3

In your situation not really, the 6D does everything you need except track moving subjects. Of course the 1/4000 May bother you too but there's a trade off because the 6D in return will give you a better sensor.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ksbal
Goldmember
Avatar
2,745 posts
Gallery: 374 photos
Best ofs: 9
Likes: 2433
Joined Sep 2010
Location: N.E. Kansas
     
Jun 22, 2016 14:59 |  #4

if the 6D is performing to your needs, then I wouldn't replace it.

for me personally, I need the outer AF points to be reliable, and lock. So I needed the 5D3.

Totally depends on shooting style and needs.


Godox/Flashpoint r2 system, plus some canon stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trevor04GT
Senior Member
Avatar
722 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 205
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
     
Jun 22, 2016 15:23 |  #5

I agree with the above. 6D definitely holds its own


Trevor - Canon 6D Mark 2 / Sigma 24mm 1.4 Art / Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art / Sigma 50mm 1.4 Art / Canon 70-200 II F2.8L / DJI Mavic Air / DJI OM4 / GoPro 8 Black

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Jun 23, 2016 10:40 |  #6

Glass may be a factor, here. I have some large aperture lenses and I do find myself shooting wide open portraits in full sun. In those cases, I ramp up the shutterspeed to 1/8000 even with an ND filter on (I don't have various stop filters for a single filter size, let alone for several filter sizes).


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Myboostedgst
Goldmember
Avatar
1,911 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Likes: 666
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
     
Jun 23, 2016 10:58 |  #7

If you want to use focus points other than the center, it is an upgrade. In did lit hotel rooms anything other than the center focus point was completely useless for me on the 6D.


Andrew | Midwest Automotive (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick ­ Aufiero
Senior Member
462 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 87
Joined May 2013
Location: Tampa
     
Jun 23, 2016 18:40 |  #8

I was in the same boat recently and honestly just wanting to waste money and upgrade but I would wait until the 6D Mark two comes out or something. If your current camera does everything you need it to do then there's no reason to replace. The autofocusing system is really the only upgrade . I hear video is a little better but I'm not sure why nor if it honestly matters for us normal people. I've actually heard that low light situations the 6D is normally rated higher and outperforms so I guess you definitely have to ask yourself why do you need to upgrade and is it worth the nice chunk of change you could spend on new glass




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
absplastic
Goldmember
Avatar
1,643 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by absplastic. (2 edits in all)
     
Jun 24, 2016 14:35 |  #9

I used a 6D exclusively for almost a year, and ended up upgrading to a 5DSR to address specific shortcomings of the 6D I encountered in some real-world scenarios, the majority of which have to do with the autofocus system (surprised, right? :-))The improvements I got from the 5DSR's AF system apply to the 5D mk III as well.

What the 6D did just fine:

  • Landscapes, cityscapes, day and night. Tripod, manual focus. I had no compelling reason to replace the 6D for this type of photography.
  • Studio portraiture/fashion. Shooting stopped down to f/8-f/11, I got good results using the center AF point and recomposing.
  • Still life, product photography, etc. As with landscape, using MF and live view, so no issues.
  • Low-light and indoor photography. The 6D's center AF point continues to work much farther past sundown than any other camera I've owned. It can practically see in the dark and lock focus in scenarios where the 5DSR needs AF assist.

Where the 6D fell short:
  • Shooting wide open with fast lenses. At f/1.8 and wider, recompose is not an option, and outer AF point mediocrity is an issue.
  • Moving subjects. A sophisticated zone-type AF system like on the 7D2 and 5D3 gets more keepers for sure. Tracking with AI Servo with just the center point is not easy, especially keeping it on fast moving small creatures.
  • Nailing critical focus in environmental portraiture and outdoor fashion editorial work. Lack of precision of the 6D's outer AF points combined with size of their sensor area gave me a lot of subtle focus misses, especially at wider apertures. 5DSR's "spot AF" can land focus on a subject's iris where the 6D would get the eyelashes, eyebrow, etc. With the 6D I had to take more shots, refocusing each time, to increase likelihood of a keeper, and resort to cheats like focusing on the outer corner of the eye or eyebrow deliberately.

More than anything else, the 5DS AF precision and spot AF feature has been worth the upgrade to me, for shooting people. I like to use fast lenses wide open, and it's nice to be able to have good cross type points across the frame that I can trust. 6D's outer points worked only acceptably in shots stopped down enough to hide small misses to critical focus, and when I wanted shallower DoF I often used the 6D in manual focus (with precision matte screen installed) or in live view zoomed in. That worked, but it's so much slower than just being able to use phase-detect AF points that work well.

5DSR, 6D, 16-35/4L IS, 85L II, 100L macro, Sigma 150-600C
SL1, 10-18 STM, 18-55 STM, 40 STM, 50 STM
My (mostly) Fashion and Portraiture Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link) (NSFW)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JacobL
Member
205 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Likes: 635
Joined Jun 2013
     
Jul 12, 2016 05:41 |  #10

Hi absplastic

I saw your comments on the 5DSR and I think of getting it for my own use. I shoot mostly landscapes with manual and AF lenses, as well as portraits mostly with manual lenses.

Other than the focus advantage of the 5DSR, can you see additional benefits?

Thanks

Jacob

absplastic wrote in post #18048997 (external link)
I used a 6D exclusively for almost a year, and ended up upgrading to a 5DSR to address specific shortcomings of the 6D I encountered in some real-world scenarios, the majority of which have to do with the autofocus system (surprised, right? :-))The improvements I got from the 5DSR's AF system apply to the 5D mk III as well.

What the 6D did just fine:
  • Landscapes, cityscapes, day and night. Tripod, manual focus. I had no compelling reason to replace the 6D for this type of photography.
  • Studio portraiture/fashion. Shooting stopped down to f/8-f/11, I got good results using the center AF point and recomposing.
  • Still life, product photography, etc. As with landscape, using MF and live view, so no issues.
  • Low-light and indoor photography. The 6D's center AF point continues to work much farther past sundown than any other camera I've owned. It can practically see in the dark and lock focus in scenarios where the 5DSR needs AF assist.

Where the 6D fell short:
  • Shooting wide open with fast lenses. At f/1.8 and wider, recompose is not an option, and outer AF point mediocrity is an issue.
  • Moving subjects. A sophisticated zone-type AF system like on the 7D2 and 5D3 gets more keepers for sure. Tracking with AI Servo with just the center point is not easy, especially keeping it on fast moving small creatures.
  • Nailing critical focus in environmental portraiture and outdoor fashion editorial work. Lack of precision of the 6D's outer AF points combined with size of their sensor area gave me a lot of subtle focus misses, especially at wider apertures. 5DSR's "spot AF" can land focus on a subject's iris where the 6D would get the eyelashes, eyebrow, etc. With the 6D I had to take more shots, refocusing each time, to increase likelihood of a keeper, and resort to cheats like focusing on the outer corner of the eye or eyebrow deliberately.

More than anything else, the 5DS AF precision and spot AF feature has been worth the upgrade to me, for shooting people. I like to use fast lenses wide open, and it's nice to be able to have good cross type points across the frame that I can trust. 6D's outer points worked only acceptably in shots stopped down enough to hide small misses to critical focus, and when I wanted shallower DoF I often used the 6D in manual focus (with precision matte screen installed) or in live view zoomed in. That worked, but it's so much slower than just being able to use phase-detect AF points that work well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
absplastic
Goldmember
Avatar
1,643 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jul 12, 2016 13:34 |  #11

JacobL wrote in post #18064775 (external link)
Hi absplastic
I saw your comments on the 5DSR and I think of getting it for my own use. I shoot mostly landscapes with manual and AF lenses, as well as portraits mostly with manual lenses.

Other than the focus advantage of the 5DSR, can you see additional benefits?Jacob

The really big advantage you will have from the 5DSR when shooting with manual focus lenses will be how much you can crop a shot. You can easily crop an 20+ megapixel headshot from a 3/4 body shot if your lens is sharp enough to make good use of the resolution. Having high-resolution portrait shots also allows for more finely-detailed retouching.

Less noticeable will be that the 5DSR can produce lower-noise shots at ISO 100 than either the 5D3 or 6D, and with nearly a stop more dynamic range. If you stand at the same spot and take the same photo with all three cameras using the same settings, and then down-sample the 5DSR shot to the pixel dimensions of the 6D or 5D3 shot, it will be cleaner. The 5DSR has more visible noise at the pixel level, but when you consider the whole frame, it has the advantage.

AFAIK, the only thing the 5D3 does better is that it has a 20% higher frame rate (6 vs 5 FPS), which won't matter for landscapes or portraiture.


5DSR, 6D, 16-35/4L IS, 85L II, 100L macro, Sigma 150-600C
SL1, 10-18 STM, 18-55 STM, 40 STM, 50 STM
My (mostly) Fashion and Portraiture Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link) (NSFW)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,011 views & 2 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Am I upgrading from a 6D by buying a 5D MK III?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is EBiffany
1143 guests, 111 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.