Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
Thread started 26 Jun 2016 (Sunday) 10:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best travel tripod, no budget limit

 
Tommydigi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,916 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 842
Joined May 2010
Location: Chicago
     
Sep 29, 2016 09:45 |  #31

I just saw this
http://www.adorama.com …-tripods-with-a-new-twist (external link)


Website (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)
Fuji X100F • Canon EOS R6 Mark 2 • G7XII • RF 16 2.8 • RF 14-35 F4 L • RF 35 1.8 • RF 800 F11 • EF 24LII L • EF 50 L • EF 100 L • EF 135 L • EF 100-400 L II • 600EX II RT • 270 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Emmett
Member
201 posts
Likes: 10
Joined May 2012
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
     
Sep 30, 2016 16:12 |  #32

Since my purchase of my new Canon 5D Mark IV, I decided to buy a new travel tripod. I was looking for a light weight, carbon fiber, with a ball head. The tripod would have to support the weight of a Tamron 150-600mm lens, and 2X extender, and my heaviest Canon camera. I selected the Nest NT-6294CTB, with ball head, for a price of $249.00. It is weight rated at 45 lbs, well over my criteria. The Nest Carbon Fiber system has a very nice finish on all parts. The locking system at the top of the legs is a slide type lock, the telescoping legs are 1/4 turn twist locks, in 4 sections in each leg. The center column takes this tripod to be 6' 6" high. There is a strong hook on the bottom of the center section to add sand bags for more stability. The legs will lock from 90 degrees to several stops until fully closed. One of the legs can be removed and used for a monopod. It came with only one mounting plate, but spares can be purchased too. I bought mine from the "Cameracottage.com" the owner is the National Distributor for Nest. Other Nest products include a very nice gimbal head. The owner of the Camera Cottage, Carter, is a wildlife, and landscape shooter, in Glacier National Park, and Yellowstone National Park. His store also rents cameras, lenses, and tripods for the pros who shoot in the Parks. Carter used to guide photographers into the Parks, but since expanding his store, he does not guide any longer. The store is located in Billings, Mt.


New Canon EOS 5D Mark IV, Canon EOS 7D Mark II, Canon EOS 50D, Canon 7D Classic, Canon 6D, Canon EF 70-200 f4L USM with IS, Canon 40mm pancake, Canon EF 50mm 1.8, Canon EF-S 10-22mm wide angle, Canon EF-S 18-135 IS STM, Canon EF 100mm 2.8L USM Macro, Tamron 18-270mm Dii VC, Tamron SP 150-600mm VC, Tamron SP 24-70mm f2.8 VC USM, Canon EF 16-35 f2.8L II USM, Tamron 2X Tele-Extender, 1.4 Tele-extender

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yinro
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Mar 2013
     
Sep 30, 2016 17:57 |  #33

Gitzo series 1 traveler with compact ball head of choice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Oct 01, 2016 13:53 as a reply to  @ yinro's post |  #34

That was my choice too. I have an old Gitzo 1550T (because it was cheap) with a Triopo RS3 on top a surprisingly good setup.

Previously I always considered my Gitzo 2 series Mountaineer as the minimum useful size but, with a little care, the 1 series Gitzo travellers are very good + fold up nice and small!


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stevewf1
Senior Member
Avatar
830 posts
Likes: 247
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis
Post edited over 6 years ago by stevewf1. (2 edits in all)
     
Oct 29, 2016 04:40 |  #35

I just got an RRS TQC-14 and put my RRS BH-30 ball head on it. It's a very good setup and I'm happy with it but when I add in tax and shipping to the cost, I'm sitting here looking at an $1,100 tripod...


Steve

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,255 posts
Likes: 1525
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
Post edited over 6 years ago by John from PA.
     
Oct 29, 2016 08:33 |  #36

I'm post #36 and probably opinion #36 but check the Manfrotto Befree series.

https://www.manfrotto.​us …2BTWhMRPvU94ioa​AvnM8P8HAQ (external link)

Some reviews at https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com …ompact_travel_c​arbon.html (external link).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaitlyn2004
Goldmember
1,694 posts
Likes: 204
Joined Oct 2009
     
Oct 31, 2016 20:14 |  #37

yinro wrote in post #18144889 (external link)
Gitzo series 1 traveler with compact ball head of choice.

Their quoted closed length (i.e. 16.73in for GT1545T) is for the reverse-folded length, right? What's the length "normal"?

I do love my Feisol 3441T, but every time I think about it I just wish it closed a bit shorter!


My Landscape Photography Videos (external link)
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Oct 31, 2016 20:56 as a reply to  @ stevewf1's post |  #38

That is the price of quality!

Look at it this way, you won't be "upgrading" or replacing it for several decades or more - so it's cheaper in the long run!

I have no idea how old my Gitzo traveller is (old model bought used and superseded at least once/twice?) but it looks and functions like new.

Buy the best tripod = buy once!


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lgormley
Junior Member
22 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2008
Location: NJ
     
Nov 01, 2016 07:34 |  #39

F2Bthere wrote in post #18119086 (external link)
The 3-Legged Thing tripods are fantastic. They use standard Arca-Swiss plates, they fold up small and are quite stable and strong. (A little trip to YouTube will reveal people crazy enough to demonstrate the strength by balancing themselves on the tripods).

I have one that I am quite happy with which is at least three generations back. Which brings up the most interesting aspect. This little British company entered the tripod market as an upstart and brought very sophisticated engineering to the creation of a better tripod. And the innovation continues at a surprising rate.

Our local store finally started carrying them and the current generation is a huge step up because of all the small details they have improved. Just the feel of the knobs and the ease with which they lock and unlock...

There are less expensive alternatives which have similar specs, but the details and stability are much better.

I suppose that 3LT's quality control is still a work-in-progress. The 3LT Equinox Leo with AirHed Light ball head that I had purchased had some quality control issues. The twist locks were loose on some legs and required over-tightening. Otherwise, one or more leg sections would collapse under load. While it felt fairly stable overall considering its small size, five leg sections, and two center column sections, it just could not compare to the Gitzo GT1555T. I sent the 3LT Leo back to B&H, and the replacement one had other problems.

It's disappointing since 3LT markets its tripods as having equivalent build quality with less cost compared to alternatives from Gitzo, RRS, etc. It seems that 3LT is releasing new products without necessarily learning from their previous ones.

The one thing I really liked about the 3LT Leo was the included carrying bag. It fit the tripod and head perfectly, and it was very lightweight and collapsible for transport. With how expensive Gitzo is, all Gitzo tripods should ship with a decent bag. Instead, Gitzo only included a carrying strap for the GT1555T.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lgormley
Junior Member
22 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2008
Location: NJ
     
Nov 01, 2016 07:41 |  #40

kaitlyn2004 wrote in post #18172426 (external link)
Their quoted closed length (i.e. 16.73in for GT1545T) is for the reverse-folded length, right? What's the length "normal"?

I do love my Feisol 3441T, but every time I think about it I just wish it closed a bit shorter!

Yes, the closed lengths quoted by Gitzo for the 1 series tripods are the reverse-folded lengths. A fully collapsed center column measures about three inches above the tripod spider, so you could add that to the quoted closed length to arrive at a rough approximation of the so-called "normal" collapsed length.

This is a good question since certain use cases would work best without having to fold the legs back when moving from location to location. However, folding the legs is quite easy and fast on the GT1555T, so it should not be an issue for most.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lgormley
Junior Member
22 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2008
Location: NJ
     
Nov 01, 2016 07:45 |  #41

yinro wrote in post #18144889 (external link)
Gitzo series 1 traveler with compact ball head of choice.

I agree that this is the best option currently available if one has an unlimited budget. However, I would not recommend Gitzo's kit ball heads unless maximum compactness is required. While Gitzo has certainly improved its travel ball heads over previous generations, there are better alternatives available from RRS and others.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peter_n
Goldmember
Avatar
2,483 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Boston, USA
     
Nov 19, 2016 10:14 |  #42

^ I'm also not a fan of Gitzo ballheads but I do like their tripods - my 3541LS systematic is in it's 6th year. Very few (maybe one?) companies make both quality heads as well as tripods. I wasn't impressed with my series-1 traveler though and ultimately replaced it with a Benro traveler which is now well into it's 7th year, my most used tripod and still steady as a rock. With no budget the OP might be interested in a new travel tripod from RRS, the TFC-14 (external link). Also RRS prices are increasing across the board 5-10% on Jan 1, 2017.


~Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ming-Tzu
Senior Member
919 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jan 27, 2017 11:56 |  #43

Great thread guys.

Debating between the 1555T and the 1545T from Gitzo, which I will add the RRS 30 and the plate for my 5dm3

I like the 14 inch folded length of the 1555t but not the five section legs, which the 1545 doesn't have. Also, the 1545 is a bit taller at max height. Hmm

Also wondering about the L bracket vs regular arca plate from RSS. L Plate on the camera isn't really that compact in the bag but hmm

Thoughts? Wanna use the setup for backpacking across Scandinavia and Italy later this year.


<insert gear here>

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SailingAway
Senior Member
497 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 137
Joined Sep 2013
Post edited over 6 years ago by SailingAway.
     
Jan 27, 2017 12:37 |  #44

Ming-Tzu wrote in post #18256931 (external link)
Also wondering about the L bracket vs regular arca plate from RSS. L Plate on the camera isn't really that compact in the bag but hmm

Thoughts? Wanna use the setup for backpacking across Scandinavia and Italy later this year.

I have both an L-plate and a standard. The L is great for extended portrait sessions. For in-and-out-of-the-bag use, (including travel!) I prefer a standard plate, and drop the cam into the notch on the ball head for the vertical shots.

This also means that if I'm in the middle of shooting horizontals and want a couple verticals, I just loosen the ball friction a little bit and *bam*, I'm vertical. I found myself doing that for quick changes even with the L-plate mounted.

A change to vertical using the L doesn't take much time, but, it does require your attention, and you may lose a moving subject.

I'm holding on to the L. In my shooting it's a necessity for people and panoramas.


From the upper left corner of the U.S.
Photos, Video & Pano r us.
College and workshop instructor in video and audio.
70D, Sigma 8mm, Tokina f2.8 11-16, Canon EF-S f2.8 17-55, Sigma f2.8 50-150 EX OS, Tamron 150-600VC. Gigapan Epic Pro, Nodal Ninja 5 & R10.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ming-Tzu
Senior Member
919 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2012
     
Jan 27, 2017 13:15 as a reply to  @ SailingAway's post |  #45

Thanks for the information!

Here's what I have on my Potential Buy list. Need to figure out my needs first, but wanted to put a list together:

Tripod

  • I already have two Gitzo GT3542XLS tripods for home and local use, but for travel, I currently have a MeFoto RoadTrip. Was considering the MeFoto Backpacker for something more compact folded up, but don't think it's that stable from what people have said.

  • Currently looking into the GT1545T vs. GT1555T. The 1555 folds down to 14 inches compared to the 16.7 inches for the 1545, but the 1545 is about 6 inches taller at max height. Might opt for the 1555 since the extra six inches doesn't seem like much but the 2.7 inches in decreased folded length is huge.

  • The thing that's holding me back with regards to the 1555 is the five leg sections, compared to the four leg sections of the 1545. Other than the few extra seconds to setup and break down the 1555, are there any other disadvantages of a five leg vs. four leg tripod? Stability?


Ball Head
  • Currently, have two Manfrotto 498RC2 for my Gitzo and Mefoto tripods, but notice there is a bit of a dip after I set it. Not too big of a deal but annoying.

  • Looking at the RRS BH-55, with possibly adding the leveling plate. This head would be for home use.

  • Question for me is, clamp vs. screw. Leaning towards the clamp due to convenience and compactness, unless people think the screw is more secure?

  • For travel, looking at the BH-30 vs. BH-40?


Misc
  • Will probably get both the RRS L plate and the regular RRS plate. The L plate would be used when I'm home and local, but too bulky for backpacking use I think, which is where the regular plate would be better.


Again, this is all a preliminary catch-all list that will get trimmed down and/or replaced depending on my needs and people's comments. By the way, as far as gear, I have dual 5Dm3's and a variety of lenses. However, for travel, I imagine I'd only bring one 5D and definitely the 16-35 f/4, and maybe 1-2 other lenses, one of which is the 70-200L.

Thanks in advance to any comments and opinions!!

<insert gear here>

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

28,114 views & 15 likes for this thread, 33 members have posted to it and it is followed by 21 members.
Best travel tripod, no budget limit
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1109 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.