The only lens thats been mentioned here thats not a rumor is the venus 12mm...this thread probably could move to he rumor section as well
Seeing as how the 12/2.8 isn't even listed on their website, I would consider that one a rumor too.
Jul 07, 2016 19:33 | #31 DreDaze wrote in post #18059474 The only lens thats been mentioned here thats not a rumor is the venus 12mm...this thread probably could move to he rumor section as well Seeing as how the 12/2.8 isn't even listed on their website, I would consider that one a rumor too. Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
estabro Member 82 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Wash DC More info | Jul 08, 2016 06:44 | #32 EF 50mm F/1.4 II Canon 6D 50mm 1.4 and 16-35mm f/4 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fordmondeo I was Soupdragon in a former life. More info | Jul 08, 2016 09:53 | #33 A 50 mm 1.2 IS that didn't suffer from focus shift is the dream for me. Vaginator9000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PeterAlex7 Member 159 posts Likes: 41 Joined Dec 2015 More info | Jul 08, 2016 13:18 | #34 Also a 85L III.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FEChariot Goldmember More info Post edited over 7 years ago by FEChariot. | Jul 09, 2016 08:32 | #36 Bonbridge wrote in post #18061971 Sigma 85/1.4 Art Sigma 135/1.4 Art Sigma 200/1.8 Art Canon 20/2.8 pancake Canon 80/2.8 pancake Lol those last two are funny. Seriously how is this not been moved to the rumors section? Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FuturamaJSP Goldmember 2,227 posts Likes: 82 Joined Oct 2009 More info | basically a OTUS 85mm with Canons ring USM They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I said I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard! - Fallout New Vegas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 10, 2016 23:02 | #38 Looking for the 24-105 II to come out. I am debating adding the current version of this lens, but I may want to hold out to see how the new one performs--if it comes out any time soon. Fuji XT-2 | Fujinon 10-24 | Zeus Touit 32 | Fujinon 55-200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FuturamaJSP Goldmember 2,227 posts Likes: 82 Joined Oct 2009 More info Post edited over 7 years ago by FuturamaJSP. | well the 24-105L II will make the 24-70 f4 IS even less popular They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I said I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard! - Fallout New Vegas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 11, 2016 07:05 | #40 FuturamaJSP wrote in post #18092433 well the 24-105L II will make the 24-70 f4 IS even less popular I wonder what Canon was thinking when they released that lens. I know the fans would mention it's "macro" ability but it's totally not a true macro lens and at 70mm the working distance is rather short and waay too short for moving objects like insects why??? Why not... it's called product devolopment. Take a look here: http://www.the-digital-picture.com …=355&CameraComp=453&FLI=0 A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PeterAlex7 Member 159 posts Likes: 41 Joined Dec 2015 More info Post edited over 7 years ago by PeterAlex7. | Aug 11, 2016 10:36 | #41 Or canon 85 f1.2 with otus quality, should be cheaper
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FuturamaJSP Goldmember 2,227 posts Likes: 82 Joined Oct 2009 More info | hope they will make one before i die They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I said I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard! - Fallout New Vegas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
UKmitch86 Senior Member More info | Aug 12, 2016 05:04 | #43 Amazed this thread is still not being shifted into the rumour section, so hey ho, I might as well join in! Canon 1Ds3 | 16-35/4 | 50/1.8 | 135/2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FuturamaJSP Goldmember 2,227 posts Likes: 82 Joined Oct 2009 More info | I am talking about the rumored 24-105L II which I am sure will perform much better than the current one that was released more than ten years ago. They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I said I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard! - Fallout New Vegas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info Post edited over 7 years ago by DreDaze. | Aug 12, 2016 05:21 | #45 FuturamaJSP wrote in post #18093379 I am talking about the rumored 24-105L II which I am sure will perform much better than the current one that was released more than ten years ago. Unless Canon decides to charge significantly more than the original 24-105L I don't really see why anyone would choose the 24-70L f4 IS over the new 24-105L II charge significantly more than the actual retail price of the lens?($1,000)...i don't know how much the new lens will be...but i'd expect it to be more than that...what was the 24-70f4IS introduced at? like $1,600 or something i think...they're saying the new 5DIV package with the new 24-105L will be more than the 24-70f4 IS Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 1327 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||