Strick wrote in post #18060376
I have been happy with the 7D, i actually picked it up here used a little more than a year ago to replace the heavy 1D IIn. It has done well in that regard and i would be keeping it.
I know the 7D II is beyond the original and 80D but there are some things that are on the 80D that are very appealing. I just don't want to take a step back I'm Af performance to get some of those features.
I hear ya,
I too went from a 1D II to a 7D, ultimately because I wanted more resolution, everything else I was happy with the 1D II. But 8MP vs 18MP makes a difference for large crops on distant subjects and that really did matter more to me. The 7D files are not as clean, funny enough, as the 1D II files, at least to me. I too am watching the latest releases as I do not buy what's new, I buy it after a few years. Right now, if I were to choose between the 7D2 & the 80D, I honestly think I'd get the 80D for what I do. I never use 8FPS of either my 1D II nor 7D. I mostly do bursts of 3 and that's it. I can live without more FPS. I think 6~7 FPS is fine for birds really, but I'm not doing it for a living, so I don't need every extra frame, but that's just my situation. The 80D has a lot of things that are interesting such as the much improved dynamic range and the much more sensitive AF cross points that can do -3 EV like the 6D and 7D2 can, which is very impressive. I'll take the more sensitive AF cross points over the 1 FPS difference for sure, as it means more shots in low light locking on. I have no care for video, so none of the video options on these cameras matter to me.
If I were shopping the 7D2, I would have to actually choose between a 1DIV and the 7D2 and I'd probably lean towards the 1DIV probably.
Unless something crazy happens in the next few years, I'm sure I"ll replace my 7D eventually with either an 80D or a 1DIV, but probably the 80D for size/weight.
Very best,