Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 08 Jul 2016 (Friday) 18:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

question about ISO

 
PJmak
Senior Member
722 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 361
Joined Feb 2009
     
Jul 08, 2016 18:28 |  #1

Sorry I wasn't sure where to post this. I looked through the index a handful of times but no section seemed proper :/

I always try to keep ISO low, mostly below 640 but ive seen some great and clean high ISO shots so I want to experiment. I have a canon 60D btw.

Does ISO work differently at different aperture and shutter speed settings?

For example would 800 ISO produce the same amount of noise at f2.8 and shutter speed of 2000 as it would at f5.6 and 600 shutter speed.

These are just example figures above to get the point across. Hope I am making sense


Viewbug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CheleA
Senior Member
355 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 155
Joined Jul 2014
     
Jul 08, 2016 20:08 |  #2

Yes, it would be the same. The quality of the image would of course be dependant on how well your camera handles ISO 800. The one thing I can tell you is that ETTR(Expose To The Right) has done wonders for my photography. It has allowed me to get so much more out the photos than before I started using/understanding ETTR. BTW, ETTR only works if you are shooting RAW -- you will just get washed out shots if you only shoot JPG's. Mind you, I mostly shoot landscapes and macro, all with available light.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,419 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4506
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 7 years ago by Wilt.
     
Jul 08, 2016 20:13 |  #3

Well, the two combos in your OP are not equivalent

0EV +1EV +2EV
1/2000, 1/1000, 1/500
f/5.6, f/4, f/2.8

...but the number of photons of light striking the sensor are the same for 1/2000 f/2.8 as for 1/500 f/5.6


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jul 08, 2016 21:00 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

Wilt wrote in post #18061647 (external link)
Well, the two combos in your OP are not equivalent

0EV +1EV +2EV
1/2000, 1/1000, 1/500
f/5.6, f/4, f/2.8

...but the number of photons of light striking the sensor are the same for 1/2000 f/2 as for 1/500 f/5.6

Close, but no banana, Wilt.

1/2000 & f/2 = 1/500 & f/4, not 1/500 & f/5.6.

I'm pretty sure you meant 1/2000 & f/2.8. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jul 08, 2016 21:03 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

CheleA wrote in post #18061644 (external link)
Yes, it would be the same. The quality of the image would of course be dependant on how well your camera handles ISO 800. The one thing I can tell you is that ETTR(Expose To The Right) has done wonders for my photography. It has allowed me to get so much more out the photos than before I started using/understanding ETTR. BTW, ETTR only works if you are shooting RAW -- you will just get washed out shots if you only shoot JPG's. Mind you, I mostly shoot landscapes and macro, all with available light.

You've got to be using a really old camera to be limited to ISO 800. Most modern (7D and newer) cameras produce very good results at 3200, and quite use-able results at 6400. Higher for full frame. IMHO, ISO is not much of an issue these days.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13370
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Jul 08, 2016 22:03 |  #6

PJmak wrote in post #18061609 (external link)
Sorry I wasn't sure where to post this. I looked through the index a handful of times but no section seemed proper :/

I always try to keep ISO low, mostly below 640 but ive seen some great and clean high ISO shots so I want to experiment. I have a canon 60D btw.

Does ISO work differently at different aperture and shutter speed settings?

For example would 800 ISO produce the same amount of noise at f2.8 and shutter speed of 2000 as it would at f5.6 and 600 shutter speed.

These are just example figures above to get the point across. Hope I am making sense

Heya,

ISO is actually a very complicated thing, much more complicated than aperture & shutter speed in regard to what it does to the resulting file you create. But instead of delving into how all that works and getting into some truly spooky sounding stuff, just know that ISO can be very simple and if you relieve yourself of worrying that you'll get noise due to using ISO, and start expanding and shooting with high ISO in mind, and focusing on good exposure, you'll find yourself shooting at ISO 1600, 3200 and 6400 as if it were nothing to sweat, and even ISO 12,800 with some fine control over what you're doing.

Go take a look at the High ISO (3200+) thread. There's lots of tips & techniques and examples of high ISO from old sensors, much older than your 60D, and newer stuff.

Also take a look for threads regarding ETTR (exposing to the right), as a technique to making a cleaner result when using high ISO.

The biggest tip to using high ISO is to get exposure right. You will get noise when you're under-exposed. Even at ISO 100! If you gently expose to the right a little, sometimes just 1/3rd but even up to 1.5 stops exposed to the right, you then drop the exposure in post and you get a much cleaner result. And that's before dealing with noise reduction techniques.

Next up, learning to process high ISO. It's a bit different but there are more modern software now that can handle noise better than before. Take a look at Topaz DeNoiser. Worth it's weight in gold if you shoot high ISO, it is very good at cleaning up without destroying detail. You start by also shooting RAW for the best file to begin with to process.

Shoot RAW.

The apparent noise is actually more dependent on the exposure than the actual ISO value itself.

+++++++++++++

I expose to the right with older sensors, usually by about +2/3rds to +1 stop or so, depending on how dark it is, and will shoot as high as ISO as I need to get enough light. I shoot RAW. I drop exposure in post, and it cleans up nicely on it's own. And then, if I feel the need, I will kiss it with a light touch of Topaz Denoiser to smooth out areas where it's slightly under-exposed and noise shows up more.

Here's some examples of the same family sensor as yours (the 60D is the same as the 7D, T3i, T5i, EOS-M, etc basically for ISO), here I'm using an EOS-M, again, same sensor as yours, same ISO performance:

ISO 12,800

IMAGE: https://c8.staticflickr.com/8/7456/15827447143_3520fcbc78_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/q7BN​BH  (external link) IMG_7103 (external link) by Martin Wise (external link), on Flickr

ISO 12,800

IMAGE: https://c8.staticflickr.com/1/398/20447200175_722c26146a_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/x9Rf​f4  (external link) IMG_8153 (external link) by Martin Wise (external link), on Flickr

ISO 12,800

IMAGE: https://c3.staticflickr.com/1/686/22858489610_77f6bd0ba5_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/APVJ​zQ  (external link) IMG_9135 (external link) by Martin Wise (external link), on Flickr

ISO 6,400

IMAGE: https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5782/22759909097_5323ed1950_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/AFdu​2P  (external link) IMG_9172 (external link) by Martin Wise (external link), on Flickr

ISO 6,400

IMAGE: https://c2.staticflickr.com/9/8572/16445712361_7794a7d4b3_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/r4fz​jR  (external link) IMG_7076 (external link) by Martin Wise (external link), on Flickr

+++++++++++

And here's a 10+ year old 5D classic. This is an old, old sensor.

ISO 3,200 (this is H, expanded, maxed out)

IMAGE: https://c3.staticflickr.com/1/765/21335661834_cf9ba7be46_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/yvmQ​Ww  (external link) IMG_5352 (external link) by Martin Wise (external link), on Flickr

Very best,

My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,419 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4506
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jul 09, 2016 14:40 |  #7

Bassat wrote in post #18061700 (external link)
Close, but no banana, Wilt.

1/2000 & f/2 = 1/500 & f/4, not 1/500 & f/5.6.

I'm pretty sure you meant 1/2000 & f/2.8. :)

Yup, I corrected my earlier post


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CheleA
Senior Member
355 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 155
Joined Jul 2014
     
Jul 09, 2016 15:12 |  #8

Bassat wrote in post #18061704 (external link)
You've got to be using a really old camera to be limited to ISO 800. Most modern (7D and newer) cameras produce very good results at 3200, and quite use-able results at 6400. Higher for full frame. IMHO, ISO is not much of an issue these days.

I stand corrected as far as the exposure. This picture was taken with a Canon 70D before I realized the benefits of ETTR. Now I use a 6D and one of the first things I did was install Magic Lantern(ML), I installed ML in my 70D and have become a convert! ML is opening a can of worms for some people:( One of the best things ML has is the ability to show when the highlights are getting clipped, which is the biggest danger of using ETTR. After all, any data in the clipped portions of the image is lost and nothing can be done to recover it.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/07/2/LQ_802504.jpg
Image hosted by forum (802504) © CheleA [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PJmak
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
722 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 361
Joined Feb 2009
     
Jul 09, 2016 15:48 |  #9

Wow so much information. Thank you everyone. Ill read it a few more times before I start trying to apply these tips :)


Viewbug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maverick75
Cream of the Crop
5,718 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 621
Joined May 2012
Location: Riverside,California
     
Jul 09, 2016 17:34 |  #10

Exposure is really the key to controlling noise, a badly exposed ISO 100 shot can have tremendous noise.


- Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
Flickr (external link) - 500px (external link) - Website (external link)- Feedback -Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deejjjaaaa
Member
Avatar
150 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Jul 2016
Location: Steel City, Rust Belt
Post edited over 7 years ago by deejjjaaaa.
     
Jul 10, 2016 01:00 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

PJmak wrote in post #18061609 (external link)
Does ISO work differently at different aperture and shutter speed settings?
For example would 800 ISO produce the same amount of noise at f2.8 and shutter speed of 2000 as it would at f5.6 and 600 shutter speed.

"ISO" when it is (for a particular nominal value) implemented as an analog gain before ADC (on die or off sensor) typically leads to reduced noise (better S/N) in deep shadows... however depending on a particular camera and "ISO" value it might be post ADC purely digital multiplication and/or ISO-by-tag (that is where firmware just writes an instruction for a raw converter to do a proper hidden exposure correction)... so typically people study how their cameras behave and (considering the raw converter of choice) do not go above the last nominal value where it is still "analog" gain... also they check that what intermediate nominal values are a combination of analog and digital (a lot of old canons have that) in order not to use such ISOs

to read

1) photonstophotos.net

2) rawdigger.com

also ISO (gain) is not a part of exposure (which as noted is only controlled by exposure time and aperture value = amount of light hitting the whole sensor area)... nominal ISO dialed by a photographer is a decision that a photographer makes before starting the exposure that affects what (and how) is happening after the exposure ends (analog gain and/or digital gain and/or ISO by tag written by firmware)...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,057 views & 2 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
question about ISO
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
861 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.