Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 21 Jul 2016 (Thursday) 08:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

First try at portraits

 
armis
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 21, 2016 08:15 |  #1

A friend of mine opened her practice a few months ago and long story short, I realized her photos (those that show up in Google and those on her website), well, sucked. Cell-phone shots, no perspective correction, poor lighting, and one old pixelated portrait. Even though I don't do real-estate or posed portraits I thought even I could do better. So as a favor and a way to get a bit of experience there, I offered to take some shots for her last weekend.

Here are a few of the finished images; I'd be interested in opinions. They're all taken with a single off-camera flash bounced on the walls - the place was fairly small - and a tripod.

IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/W1qhOTQ.jpg

IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/YFyNkic.jpg

IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/GgFWOe1.jpg

Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
atsilverstein
Goldmember
Avatar
1,254 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 1760
Joined Mar 2015
Location: NYC Metro
     
Jul 21, 2016 09:44 |  #2

Well these are probably a thousand times better than what she had, so I'm sure she is happy with them and it will for sure improve her business image. I don't really have much to say because they look pretty good to me except that maybe the lighting is a bit flat in #1 and if it's possible to try to not cut off the table and equipment in #2 and #3. But you might not have had the option anyway in a small room.

Did you take a headshot?


It matters not how strait the gate, How charged with punishments the scroll. I am the master of my fate: I am the captain of my soul.
- William Ernest Henley

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_311
Checking squirrels nuts
3,761 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 570
Joined Mar 2011
     
Jul 21, 2016 12:59 |  #3

great job. she really needs to smile a nice natural smile though.


Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
www.michaelalestraphot​ography.com (external link)
Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | About me

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dodgyexposure
Goldmember
2,874 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 234
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jul 21, 2016 20:27 |  #4

mike_311 wrote in post #18073638 (external link)
great job. she really needs to smile a nice natural smile though.

... and perhaps sit up a little straighter. She is slumped down on her elbows, raising her shoulders.

Overall, good shots.


Cheers, Damien

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texkam
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
Avatar
1,580 posts
Likes: 998
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington USA
     
Jul 21, 2016 23:59 |  #5

I'd pretty aggressively crop #1. Otherwise good work.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 22, 2016 09:36 |  #6

Thanks for the feedback. She didn't request a headshot and the files have enough resolution for a 100% crop for website-viewing, so #1 can serve as that. We worked on posing and I guided her as best I could, but a) couldn't get her completely comfortable in front of the camera, and b) missed the raised shoulders. My mistake, I'll know better next time.

@texham: how would you crop it? Cut off above the elbows? Or a bit wider than that?


Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
olafs ­ osh
I am a nice and fluffy dude
Avatar
1,933 posts
Gallery: 146 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 649
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Latvia and Lithuania
Post edited over 7 years ago by olafs osh. (2 edits in all)
     
Jul 22, 2016 11:23 |  #7

It's a CC section, yeeey! I can critique!!!

So - they are all bad.

Well, no, not really, just joking. I agree with cropping the first one - the bottom of the image is just a waste. Also the left side. I just would enter the crop pode and slide the bottom left corner inwards. And then all the right side inwards a bit.
The same goes with the second actually - too much mute space, whicj in this case reaping apart the image. The wide angle distortion is debatable, matter of taste, let's leave it at that :D
And you have waaay too much floor in the third and none of the ceiling. It just make things awkward. Go a bit lower /too late for that, of course/, rearrange things... You could actually make a wide angle effect play even stronger and get up close and personal with nearest corner of the table, but it's too late for that as well, heh. I would bin it.

cheerio


- Olafs Osh
fb (external link) | instagram (external link) | YT (external link)|OLAFSOSH.COM (external link)|
Give us "Street Photography" sub-forum in P.O.T.N. !

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PineBomb
I have many notable flaws
Avatar
2,904 posts
Gallery: 244 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3241
Joined Apr 2014
Location: USA
     
Jul 22, 2016 11:39 |  #8

osh_sekta wrote in post #18074474 (external link)
The wide angle distortion is debatable, matter of taste, let's leave it at that

Generally speaking, I would agree with this comment. However, given the healthcare-practice context of the images, I would avoid perspective distortion at all costs. Distortion can have the unintended consequence of making the viewer uneasy--precisely what you don't want to do with prospective patients. In image #2, if you placed a bone saw on the headrest of that examination table it's game over. ;-)a


-Matt
Website (external link) | flickr (external link) | instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
olafs ­ osh
I am a nice and fluffy dude
Avatar
1,933 posts
Gallery: 146 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 649
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Latvia and Lithuania
     
Jul 22, 2016 11:41 as a reply to  @ PineBomb's post |  #9

good point.


- Olafs Osh
fb (external link) | instagram (external link) | YT (external link)|OLAFSOSH.COM (external link)|
Give us "Street Photography" sub-forum in P.O.T.N. !

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Acetoolguy
Senior Member
Avatar
432 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 139
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Buzzards Bay MA
     
Jul 25, 2016 05:47 |  #10

Maybe you could sell her some prints to hang on the wall? Anything to add some warmth to the environment.


Never use a paragraph when a sentence will do.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
906 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Jan 2012
     
Jul 26, 2016 02:46 |  #11

Thanks for the additional feedback, and some great points all around.

We all agreed on the need to hang prints or something, but I got there and there were none, so... Not much I could do about this part.

Thank you for the tip about having some floor and some ceiling and not too much of either. Now that you've said it it seems obvious that in every real estate shot I've seen floor and ceiling were balanced, but it didn't occur to me in the moment.

Now about wide angle: I'm afraid I didn't have a choice. The place is tiny. In every shot you see above, the camera's back was basically to the wall. In shot #1 I could actually not review the images on the LCD screen. I tried straightening lines as best I could but I can't fix perspective; decided to go with it and use the strong diagonals to make the images dynamic. I can't disagree the end result looks a bit extreme.


Fuji X-T4, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms, Samyang 12
www.wtbphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,978 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
First try at portraits
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1455 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.