Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 11 Mar 2006 (Saturday) 10:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

 
vjack
Goldmember
Avatar
1,602 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Mississippi, USA
     
Mar 11, 2006 10:28 |  #1

It dawned on me that it might be a good idea for those of us researching particular lenses to provide links to some of the useful information we've found. Here are links to some excellent review information for those considering this lens:

http://www.photozone.d​e …non_70300_456is​/index.htm (external link)
http://www.pbase.com/f​stopjojo/70300is (external link)
http://www.fredmiranda​.com …=294&sort=7&cat​=27&page=2 (external link)
http://www.photo.net …anon/70-300is/review.html (external link)
http://www.the-digital-picture.com …6-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx (external link)

I had almost decided on the 70-200 f/4, but I must admit that I'm now having second thoughts and wondering if the 70-300 IS would be a smarter buy.



Canon 20D
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L

Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6
L IS
Canon Speedlite 430EX
Manfrotto 3021BPRO; Kirk BH-1 ballhead
Canon Pixma 4200
< see my gallery (external link) >

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Lightstream
Yoda
14,915 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Cult of the Full Frame
     
Mar 12, 2006 00:01 |  #2

These are the photos that conclusively prove to me that it's not the hardware, it's the operator: http://www.pbase.com …le/mn_wildlife_​connection (external link)

I am absolutely blown away by what he's managed to achieve with it, which will probably be more than I ever do with mine!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tess320
Senior Member
Avatar
822 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Mar 12, 2006 06:17 as a reply to  @ Lightstream's post |  #3

Well for interest sake, I took the following image (100% crop) handheld at 1/60 at 300mm. Normally shots are useable for me way before this point.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


And the 25% crop showing the image is perfectly useable, and I could have gotten it down to around 1/30 and still been able to use it...at 300mm!

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


http://www.animusphoto​graphy.com (external link)
Canon EOS 50d
Canon 70-200 F4 L
Canon 100-400 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vjack
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,602 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Mississippi, USA
     
Mar 12, 2006 06:49 |  #4

None of the review links I posted mentions problems with the optics of this lens. It appears that the primary issues are poor build quality, zoom creep, the rotating front element, and the portrait issue (which seems to be an issue for some copies but not others).



Canon 20D
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L

Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6
L IS
Canon Speedlite 430EX
Manfrotto 3021BPRO; Kirk BH-1 ballhead
Canon Pixma 4200
< see my gallery (external link) >

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tess320
Senior Member
Avatar
822 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Mar 12, 2006 17:23 |  #5

I was surprised the build quality was inferrior to the 28-135mm. I would go for another lens if it was very important to someone. It doesn't matter to me so doesn't effect me.


http://www.animusphoto​graphy.com (external link)
Canon EOS 50d
Canon 70-200 F4 L
Canon 100-400 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
YARRO
Member
Avatar
201 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Assen, The Netherlands
     
Mar 12, 2006 17:37 |  #6

I'm happy with the lens. Optics are very very good, given the price. No portrait issue with my copy.
However, zoom creep is annoying and some dampening on the focal length ring would have been nice. Apart from that, there's nothing wrong with the build quality. It's not L, but good enough.


Canon 50D + Grip, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L, Canon EF 70-300mm IS USM, Tamron AF17-50MM F/2.8, Canon Speedlite 430 EX + Lumiquest Big Bounce, Gitzo G1564L Monopod + Manfrotto 468 MG RC-0 hydro ballhead, Canon RC RS-80N3, Lowepro Slingshot 200AW.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vjack
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,602 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Mississippi, USA
     
Mar 13, 2006 06:03 as a reply to  @ Tess320's post |  #7

Tess320 wrote:
I was surprised the build quality was inferrior to the 28-135mm. I would go for another lens if it was very important to someone. It doesn't matter to me so doesn't effect me.

A couple of those reviewing the lens on Fred Miranda mentioned that the build quality was among the worst they've seen from Canon. The 28-135 and a couple other consumer-grade lenses were mentioned, so it seems that you are not alone in your opinion.



Canon 20D
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L

Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6
L IS
Canon Speedlite 430EX
Manfrotto 3021BPRO; Kirk BH-1 ballhead
Canon Pixma 4200
< see my gallery (external link) >

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jack ­ W.
Senior Member
841 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
Mar 13, 2006 07:49 as a reply to  @ vjack's post |  #8

Bought two of these, one for me and one for my wife.
We're both thrilled with the shots from this lens.
Build quality is just fine; not "L" quality of course, but fine nonetheless.
Jack


20D, 30D, 500f/4L IS, 300f/4L IS, 300f/2.8L IS, Canon 1.4TC, Canon 2xTC, 70-300IS, 17-85IS, EFS 10-22, Sigma 150 Macro, 3021PRO, RRS BH-40LR, Gitzo 1325, full Wimberley Head v2, Wimberley Sidekick, and a bunch of other stuff. :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bryan ­ k
Senior Member
Avatar
416 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Holmdel, New Jersey
     
Oct 05, 2006 20:34 as a reply to  @ Jack W.'s post |  #9

Dolphin in Tahiti


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


My Gear
5D MK IV / 5D MK II / 40D / 20D / G11 / Fuji X100T
16-35 f/2.8 L II / 24-70 f/2.8 L / 70-200 f2.8 L
35 f/1.4 L / 100 f/2.8 L / 135 f/2 L / 300 f/4 L
50 f/1.4 / 50 f/1.8 / 85 f/1.8 / MP-E 65 f2.8 Macro
550EX / 580 EX II / MT-24EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gbpro1
Member
110 posts
Joined Jul 2005
     
Feb 28, 2007 22:29 as a reply to  @ bryan k's post |  #10

There is hardly any pictures on here.. I just wanted to share. I love this lens.. Here is a few examples

https://photography-on-the.net …entid=147453&d=​1171512750

https://photography-on-the.net …151224&stc=1&d=​1172722861


Canon xti 400D W/ BG-E3 grip / 18-55 kit
Canon 70-300 f/3.5-5.6 IS
Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS.. Canon 60mm f2.8 Macro
Canon 580EX flash... Dynatran Carbon Fiber Tripod
Canon Pro 9000 printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zohar
Member
123 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: California, CA
     
Feb 28, 2007 22:42 |  #11

Can't view the second image but the first one is great, love the sharpness and perspective, good job.


(¯`·._.·My Gallery·._.·´¯) (external link)
Brand New 350D and 18-55mm lens :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aero145
Senior Member
Avatar
909 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Germany
     
Mar 01, 2007 07:17 |  #12

Lightstream wrote in post #1278577 (external link)
These are the photos that conclusively prove to me that it's not the hardware, it's the operator: http://www.pbase.com …le/mn_wildlife_​connection (external link)

I am absolutely blown away by what he's managed to achieve with it, which will probably be more than I ever do with mine!

It's the operator, yes, but it the image quality also gets better with some sharpening and resizing. ;) I don't like the bokeh.

I wasn't happy with mine... I don't want to use this lens again ever. Maybe I'm too L-addicted?


EOS 5D Mark II | EF24-105 f/4L IS | EF100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS | EF200 f/2.8L II | 580EX | Manfrotto 055xProB + 808RC4, and 679B
Le Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
purelithium
Blithering Idiot
Avatar
1,108 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
     
Mar 01, 2007 08:49 |  #13

Lightstream wrote in post #1278577 (external link)
These are the photos that conclusively prove to me that it's not the hardware, it's the operator: http://www.pbase.com …le/mn_wildlife_​connection (external link)

I am absolutely blown away by what he's managed to achieve with it, which will probably be more than I ever do with mine!

Most of the outstanding shots in that gallery are taken at f/8, where almost any lens will shine. It IS all about the operator, but it's not that hard to get great, sharp shots from a lens if you stop it down a bit...

Check out the "Lynx on the lookout" shot, examine it, and then look at the one beside it "Lynx #4" you can visibly notice better image quality in the Lynx #4 image. The Lookout is softer, less defined. But once he stopped it down to f/8, the fur is more defined and pleasing to look at.


R.M. Gelan Hopkins
5D|Voigtlander 20 3.5|EF 50mm 1.8 Mk I|430EX
third element photography (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,523 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Mar 01, 2007 10:23 |  #14

This lens seems to be a pretty good alternative to the 70-200mm f/4. What would bother me is the fact that it's parafocal (you have to re-focus after zooming) and that the front element rotates (bad for CPL use). The IS is a plus... But with the new 70-200mm f/4L IS lens out there's another option.

If you have the money, I'd go for the 70-200mm f/4L IS. You'll never regret it.

If you want to travel with the lens, I'd also suggest looking at the DO version - though this lens is not without controversy, either.

If you know the downsides going in, it's not a bad lens. Those wolf/cougar shots are ample proof that this lens can deliver.


La Vida Leica! (external link)LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1v-HS/1d Mk IIn w/E-1 & Op/Tech straps
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
iplayazi
Senior Member
Avatar
546 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Calgary Alberta
     
Mar 07, 2007 10:52 |  #15

I really enjoy using this lens and can produce some fantastic shots. I am glad I went with this lens.

First shot taken with this lens on the day I bought it.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'

Todd Kwiczak
Canon Gear
www.tkshotz.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

650,459 views & 25 likes for this thread
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is TechOne
787 guests, 383 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.